Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Troubles buying a home. | Page 6 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Troubles buying a home.

Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4118 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

what generation I am.
Don't care.

The numbers don't lie. Those in the late 70's and 80's had it worse.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39520 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:51 pm to
Lol.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60235 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

16 year olds are not buying houses.


But the people who ARE buying houses were 16 once. You said you bought a car at 16. I’m presuming that car allowed you to get a better job, get to school or training or further your education in some way, which allowed you to increase your income. Someone who isn’t in a position to buy a car at 16 because they live in a rural area without access to jobs, how are they supposed to work or further their education? How are they supposed to be able to buy a house ever? Its all related.

This is part of why people choose to live in cities: to be close to vocational and educational opportunities.

quote:

I was talking about the people looking for a home and not able to purchase one

Do only people who own their own vehicles fit into this category? Absolutely not. These people still need to be able to get to work.

quote:

If I (and millions of other people because I'm not special) can do it, why can't others?

I’m trying to get you to understand how someone would not have access to the same things you had access to that enabled you to have the life you have now.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4118 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

what generation I am.
Don't care.

The numbers don't lie. Those in the late 70's and 80's had it worse.
Posted by GeauxTigers123
Member since Feb 2007
3383 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

bitching about not being able to afford a 500K house GTFO.


I mean, I think the problem is that fixer uppers in places can run 500 K.
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
1407 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

well one problem is no one wants a "starter home" or fixer up anymore because it doesn't look good on instagram and YouTube.


Those people have a rude awakening coming.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60235 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

This isn't a political issue though. It's a finanical one.
housing is absolutely a political issue. Government policies have impacted housing for generations.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4118 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

How are they supposed to be able to buy a house ever?
Adapt and overcome. Join the military. They'll give ya 3 hots and a cot. Get the GI-bill. Do your time. Get out. Get a degree (STEM). Get a good job. Worked for me.

This post was edited on 3/14/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1772 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

I mean, I think the problem is that fixer uppers in places can run 500 K


Link?

SHow me places and I guarantee two things. There are options in that area AND the average income is higher in those areas.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60235 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Join the military.

Is that what you did? Since you keep making this about you, why should people have to do something you weren’t willing to do in order to buy a house?
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4118 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Is that what you did?
Is there something that you don't understand about "worked for me"?
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1772 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:01 pm to
So cubbies what is your solution. Give free money to Gen Z so they can buy houses? Please tell us, old wise one, your political solution to this perceived mess.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17459 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Everyone blames Biden and Covid. Trump was equally bad, and contributed to the influx of money. You guys forget it. They were both terrible.


Most of what you listed is what I called Covid. I thanked Covid. I don't think it was handled well by either president, but it was something we've never experienced and frankly was a bit of a no-win situation.

The "& Biden" in my thanks was related to the post-Covid Biden spending.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60235 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Is there something that you don't understand about "worked for me"?


Your post is edited but ok.

Let’s hope no one with epilepsy, diabetes or colorblindness ever wants to own a home.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39520 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

So cubbies what is your solution.


The solution is to build more housing, specifically to increase density, as long as capital inflows are what they are. That solution helps everyone but is hard to sell in places which were originally zoned for single family.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4118 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Let’s hope no one with epilepsy, diabetes or colorblindness ever wants to own a home.
Nothing personal, but are you a woman? My wife argues the same way. Ha ha. There are MANY other ways, just have to have the determination to accomplish it.
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1772 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:07 pm to
2017 $665 billion Pre-tax cuts, stable spending.
2018 $779 billion Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (revenue drop).
2019 $984 billion Continued tax cuts, spending increases.
2020 $3.1 trillion COVID-19 pandemic response.
2021 $2.8 trillion Continued pandemic relief efforts.
2022 $1.4 trillion Reduction in pandemic-related spending.
2023 $1.7 trillion (est.) Inflation control measures, recovery.
2024 $1.5 trillion (est.) Ongoing high spending, slower recovery.

I mean they were both pretty bad. Covid fricked everything Whether Biden or Trump was there, inflation was happening, and we would be in this situation.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67128 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

840 sq. ft. house
quote:

$275k


I can't believe no one is jumping at that attractive $327/SF price point for likely a really old house.

For comparison, the average PPSF in the US is $244.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60235 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

So cubbies what is your solution.


I haven’t been able to solve the housing crisis just yet but I have some ideas.

Eradicate short term rentals in residentially zoned neighborhoods. Prohibit or at least limit the number of homes private equity can purchase.
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1772 posts
Posted on 3/14/25 at 2:10 pm to
So your solution is high density housing? Hasn't that historically been proven to not maintain values or increase values like single family homes do? Aside from Seattle which has an inordinate amount of single family homes in the city, most big cities within the city proper are high density non-single family units.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram