- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two years later (2020 election)
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:42 am to KAGTASTIC
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:42 am to KAGTASTIC
quote:
don't forget to remind them of all the Dems that questioned Trump's election in 2016. Hell a bunch of reps boycotted his inauguration because they didn't think he was elected. Dems started it, and then cry when we play by the new rules the set. Projection 101
I missed that.
share 2 links of states where the result was so close there was a recount.
share 2 links where there was a challenge based on fraud.
imo:
none of that happened.
show your work .
people didn't go because they despise him.
4
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:45 am to Bbobalou
quote:
Do I think 1 person can beat another at the last minute? Yes. It happens all the time. Underdogs get lucky and knock you out or score a touchdown.
Do you think one team should be able to alter the rules in their favor while the other cannot?
Many jurisdictions in many states illegally altered their voting laws, and yet their electors were certified anyway as if nothing had occurred. Pence had the opportunity to return these fraudulent electors to the states they came from for correction/resolution but received a coin (like Judas) to look the other way.
And do you believe that it’s ok for one team to lose their ability to challenge the ruling on the field?
Because that’s exactly what the corrupt DOJ did when legal action was taken against these states for ignoring their own election laws and certifying their own fraud.
They said, sorry team that lost. You can’t prove that you lost as a result of these misdeeds therefore you have no standing to challenge the ruling on the field. And oh bee tee dubs the instant replay is broken so you’re just going to have to take our word for it. You lost fair and square. Because we said so. We don’t have to prove anything and you cannot have an opportunity to refute this. Time is up. You can’t put more time back on the clock. We won. Deal with it. Move on. The adults are back in charge now.
Would you honestly describe this as a free and fair election?
You know this shite stinks.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:47 am to CelticDog
quote:
CelticDog
quote:You mean, you think people prefer the genocidal totalitarian stance of your side as expressed last Thursday night by the Dem RED HITLER speech?
people didn't go because they despise him.
you really going to keep supporting that evil?
Really?
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 8:48 am
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:49 am to Bbobalou
quote:whats your answer to stopping the count in 6 swing states, kicking out all observers, then counting in secret in the middle of the night then dumping millions of votes for biden at 4 am and flipping the results...then keep counting all week til you find enough votes to win.
My answer to that is no.
You seem to be adding in something that changes the perception of a candidate by the voters. Disinformation by a party if I understand you correctly.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:49 am to McKinney Ag69
I remember Martin Sheen and a bunch of celebrities calling for the electors to refuse to certify Donald Trumps election.
Sounds like intersection to me.
NY Post Link
Sounds like intersection to me.
NY Post Link
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 8:50 am
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:50 am to CelticDog
quote:why should he do that?? You will just disappear from the thread like usual
I missed that.
share 2 links of states where the result was so close there was a recount.
share 2 links where there was a challenge based on fraud.
imo:
none of that happened.
show your work .
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:52 am to CelticDog
Bite my arse...with that provide 2 links bs and do your own hw if you missed it.
Provide 5+ links proving me wrong gimp.
Provide 5+ links proving me wrong gimp.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 8:55 am to McKinney Ag69
Tell your friends to go back to Austin, then find new Louisiana Freinds. Better quality friend!
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:09 am to Bayoubred
quote:
Tell me honestly, do you really believe PedoJoe got 81 mil votes?
I think 81 million didn’t want another Trump term. Those votes probably weren’t “for” Biden as much as against Trump.
I know there were people in my family that held their nose and voted for Trump and same for Biden. Two really horrible candidates, you had to make a choice
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 9:10 am
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:16 am to Bbobalou
quote:
Can you explain to me how a party can have a set number of votes prepared ahead of time that if needed they can be placed in certain States, counties.
TLDR? Trump won!
They have many ways, but they usually pull it off because it's not worth it to fight.
They tried to get the win for H-> but couldn't quite pull it off and gave up. Remember when Jill Stein got a recount in a certain state? They found there were something like 3 votes added for H-> for every vote she actually got. That was shut up quite quickly. I'm thinking that happened in Michigan...not positive though.
How do they know the numbers? I don't have a clue for most of it, but some of it is relatively simple to figure out.
For instance, they know how many are registered in both parties, and they know how many remain on voter rolls that have moved or died. So they have their count. They also take into consideration past voter turnout.
It's risky for them, but they usually get away with it... and once in a while they'll arrest a nobody who voted for his mom just so they can highlight and point to doing something about fraud.
One of their longtime favorite ways to pull massive fraud is to do is to hold out one corrupt county's reporting until the end.
Then comes the 'dump', and it's obvious if you're watching closely, as one candidate's total changes by 20,000 while the winning candidate's total changes by 2,000. Then they'll claim one party benefited from crossover voters, or something easily reported by the media.
In cases of voting by paper...remember when 'boxes of votes' were 'discovered' in a storage area at the Post Office, or in a back room of a polling area? Of course, those had to be added to the mix because we can't disenfranchise those voters..wasn't their fault....
There were also voting machines regularly found illegally in the possession of someone, in the trunk of their car, for instance.
With the 2020 election, concerning electronic voting, one discovery made upon examination of the data was that a 'piece' of a vote for one candidate was being taken away and 'given' to the other candidate.
Oddly enough, this only happened to the presidential candidate in most cases, not the down ballot candidates. They explained this away by claiming this proved that people really, really hated Trump, but really loved the down ballot candidate.
Don't discount the psychological games done through polls and through complicit media, such as telling voters several weeks/months out that we'll go to bed believing one candidate had won, and we'll wake up to a different winner. This is done to make us shrug.
In 2020, Donald Trump was winning in a landslide. Then everything shut down and it was a jumbled mess, too much to untangle in the few weeks before certification.
Then you have chain of custody issues. Some of the people involved in that merely said 'oops.'
Then we have the patterns on the graphs where the lines jumped straight up in an unnatural way - benefited one candidate and put him ahead - then the lines remained in an unnatural pattern.
And it was all so obvious that we didn't shrug this time.
quote:
How would you know what states?
They chose swing states to simplify things for them. Then they narrowed it down to corrupt counties:
In Georgia, the SOS changed Georgia law illegally in making a deal with Stacey Abrams. Because of that deal, mail in ballots counted no matter what...no signature, questionable signature, lived in an abandoned building/out of state, etc.
There were some other shady things he did with his purchase of Dominion for Georgia but won't get into that.
Then there was the corruption in Fulton County.
Lots of witnessed shenanigans ignored. There was finally a so-called hand recount by an 'independent' team, which was simply running the paper with questionable barcode through a Dominion machine. Turns out the recount was done by associates of Dominion.
quote:
Are you sure you wont have more ballots than voters?
That's the hardest part for them, but in many cases, they did have more 'votes' than they had 'registered voters.' This is one reason they don't like to purge the voter rolls as required by law.
quote:
If one party knows how to do it then the other party does to.
I'm sure they do, but it seems they keep it simple by keeping it local. How do you think some of them stay in office when they anger their constituents?
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:19 am to cssamerican
quote:
It is almost impossible to prove because you can’t tie a ballot back to a voter. Rule changes also made it to where we can’t even tie voting numbers to people who showed up to vote.
This is exactly right and was intentional. Unless there are drastic voting regulation changes, this widespread fraud will continue to be the norm.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:53 am to McKinney Ag69
Posted on 9/5/22 at 11:56 am to eddieray
quote:
think 81 million didn’t want another Trump term. Those votes probably weren’t “for” Biden as much as against Trump.
of course. obvious
Posted on 9/5/22 at 12:00 pm to McKinney Ag69
Two years later I still know I’d never before seen (and hope to never see again) several states randomly decide to shut things down and when they “resumed” several hours later, a guy who barely campaigned miraculously had received the most votes ever.
Maybe I just have a blind, stubborn faith that this country does not (yet) possess 81 million idiots who voted FOR this.
Maybe I just have a blind, stubborn faith that this country does not (yet) possess 81 million idiots who voted FOR this.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 12:17 pm to CelticDog
Posted on 9/5/22 at 12:24 pm to McKinney Ag69
I’m 57 years old and I too think the election was stolen. Not by widespread fraud but by surgical placement of fraudulent ballots that were perfectly placed to enable an electoral victory for Biden.
I think this system has been in operation for the past few elections and Trump called them out on it. It explains why Hillary was so furious at her loss because the fix was in but failed because of extraordinary numbers of voters who normally don’t participate throwing off her cheat game.
I think it dates back to the 2000 Bush V Gore election.
I think this system has been in operation for the past few elections and Trump called them out on it. It explains why Hillary was so furious at her loss because the fix was in but failed because of extraordinary numbers of voters who normally don’t participate throwing off her cheat game.
I think it dates back to the 2000 Bush V Gore election.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:01 pm to LSUwag
It’s existed since before Kennedy was elected President. Hell, New Orleans precincts used to wait until the rest of Louisiana reported so they knew how many votes were needed to win.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:06 pm to McKinney Ag69
Stolen election. No doubts.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:28 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
Can you explain to me how a party can have a set number of votes prepared ahead of time that if needed they can be placed in certain States, counties. That would pass the eye test? How would you know how many to have? How would you know what states? Are you sure you wont have more ballots than voters?
That just seems to hard to do. If one party knows how to do it then the other party does to.
Well, you've already displayed an extensive lack of knowledge & insight, so there's that.
Early voting, a vast & dynamic analytical database, & the additional time delays with mail-ins, sig verification, curing, & those precious voter rolls.
States can be swung with one city or one county. If you own it, you control it.
That's the dime tour. Do some homework.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:50 pm to McKinney Ag69
quote:
I’ve been hanging out with some friends of a friend and that are my age and live in Austin.
FIFY
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News