- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UAP Congressional Hearing (today)
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:47 am to omegaman66
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:47 am to omegaman66
quote:It's because UFOs were associated with redneck kooks. UAP is preferred by the more urbane kooks.
Let's change words for no reason
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:47 am to Flats
Remember when the public learned Earth wasn’t the center of the universe?
Those explanations seemed crazy too.
Those explanations seemed crazy too.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:51 am to omegaman66
quote:
To curtail belief in God. 2. To help usher in a one world govt because the world needs to unite against the aliens that are coming to kill us all. They even made a movie about it and you need to be aware that Hollywood is a big part of how they successfully control our thinking.
I don’t think the existence of aliens should necessarily curtail belief in God, but I’m in the minority.
I agree on Hollywood. But I also believe that Hollywood has heavily been used to ease the world into the fact of aliens existing, not just faking alien existence to control us. There’s a wide variety of alien related TV and movies, and only a small amount of it is horror fiction. I think the government is leading the expansion of the genre to reduce the negative associations with aliens prior to going public. As it is, many people would be happy at this point because it would prove their beliefs
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:51 am to ThinePreparedAni
TPA can you post a summary following the hearing?
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:52 am to Upperdecker
Hopefully we hear some facts and not more fricking stories.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:54 am to Upperdecker
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:54 am to Upperdecker
quote:
I don’t think the existence of aliens should necessarily curtail belief in God, but I’m in the minority.
God could have created them. It certainly would discredit our science, which is fine because science should be tested and evolve everyday.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:56 am to Upperdecker
I choose to believe what I posted because there is CIA documents to back it up.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:56 am to omegaman66
quote:
Did you mean to write UFO?
I think they changed the name, because of growing evidence of USO’s in the ocean
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:58 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
God could have created them. It certainly would discredit our science, which is fine because science should be tested and evolve everyday.
Exactly. Science will be discredited by things on other planets regardless. Science is not religion. Science is testing and conclusions and retesting when new data is found
Posted on 11/13/24 at 10:59 am to ThinePreparedAni
Seems like a bunch of government word salad so far unless I missed something.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:00 am to omegaman66
quote:
I choose to believe what I posted because there is CIA documents to back it up.
But why would you trust a disclosed CIA document? That just shows what the creator of the document believes or wants you to believe. That creator may have been led to believe those things
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:01 am to aujerm
It’s just intro. The witnesses haven’t event been introduced yet.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:01 am to momentoftruth87
Immaculate introduction IMO
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:02 am to Bard
No surprise witness unfortunately
Tones this hearing down quite a bit
Tones this hearing down quite a bit
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:15 am to LSUcam7
All the witnesses seem pretty good in the regard that they’re calling out the govt
Posted on 11/13/24 at 11:53 am to momentoftruth87
“I would have to discuss that in a closed setting”
Jeremy Corbell had the hype train flying on this specific hearing… if this is it, he’s losing credibility.
Jeremy Corbell had the hype train flying on this specific hearing… if this is it, he’s losing credibility.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:00 pm to ThinePreparedAni
I listened to a bit of it.
Elizondo testified about the document he signed which restricts what he could say. He vaguely identified the Department of Defense but wouldn’t go further.
I wonder why he wasn’t asked about the potential consequences for saying more. Most of us who have signed agreements as part of having access to high security clearance information are threatened with prosecution. I wish he would have been asked if he risks more than just prosecution for sharing information contrary to his signed agreements.
Elizondo testified about the document he signed which restricts what he could say. He vaguely identified the Department of Defense but wouldn’t go further.
I wonder why he wasn’t asked about the potential consequences for saying more. Most of us who have signed agreements as part of having access to high security clearance information are threatened with prosecution. I wish he would have been asked if he risks more than just prosecution for sharing information contrary to his signed agreements.
Posted on 11/13/24 at 12:27 pm to momentoftruth87
Or they’re not really “aliens,” but are inter dimensional beings or angels/demons.
Popular
Back to top


0






