- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update: Situation in Iran thread
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:33 pm to CitizenK
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:33 pm to CitizenK
If your VPN still shows your current location on X you can use a proxy. You just use the proxy address and place it in your browser. I use proxies, I don't use VPN. You can purchase proxies just like you can a VPN.
ETA: Yes, VPN's use proxies, just not in the same way.
ETA: Yes, VPN's use proxies, just not in the same way.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 4:35 pm
1
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:41 pm to TheOtherWhiteMeat
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:48 pm to VolInBavaria
Just let Iran keep training, they'll take themselves out.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 4:54 pm to Bunkie7672
Are you one of Tucker's Stupid Phuckers?
Posted on 2/19/26 at 5:12 pm to VolInBavaria
People taking back to the streets
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:29 pm to Bunkie7672
quote:
Can you retards not read “Account based in Germany”
My man doesn’t know how to interpret the new location based feature on X
(hint: the part that’s circled in red on the picture means more than the part that has an exclamation point to the right of it that shows a VPN is being used to show that person in Germany)
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:33 pm to Bunkie7672
quote:
just used a VPN in Belgium it didn’t change where my account was based on X. Still says the US.
There are VPN’s available that allow to change your location to any country of your choosing
quote:
believe what you want though.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:39 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 2/19/26 at 6:53 pm to TheOtherWhiteMeat
There are rumors floating about that the crashed F4 might be the result a friendly fire accident. If true, holy shite that's bad. That is like the second or 3rd time that would have happened in recent years.
They are going to send our carriers to bottom of the ocean according to their propaganda, but they cant keep from knocking their own warbirds out of the sky.
They are going to send our carriers to bottom of the ocean according to their propaganda, but they cant keep from knocking their own warbirds out of the sky.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 10:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. It’s actually 12-17 hours now, but the point still stands
Posted on 2/19/26 at 10:47 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
So here's the problem...
The U.S. cannot conduct the initial stealth strikes on Iran during a full moon. This weekend the moon is a sliver just like June 22, 2025.
Trump initiated the 1st strike four days after the 2nd carrier arrived. The USS Ford doesn't arrive until Feb 28, which is a full moon.
He either strikes this weekend with 1 carrier + the fighters on shore, or he waits until Mar 18 with 2 carriers and no moon.
If they're going to conduct ground operations after 2 weeks of heavy bombing they can't do that without the 2nd carrier and they won't do that during a full moon.
Do they go now with no ground invasion, or do they wait until March 18?
Posted on 2/19/26 at 10:51 pm to hawgfaninc
I’m not even trying to predict how this will go down as the key to success is doing the unexpected.
But we are 100% not backing down at this point.
But we are 100% not backing down at this point.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 11:04 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Tankers are the tell.
You do not surge aerial refueling assets forward unless you are preparing for sustained air operations at range. Fighters can deploy quietly. Bombers can posture symbolically. Tankers are logistics commitment. They mean planning depth.
Six KC 135s parked in Bulgaria are strategically important. Bulgaria gives reach into the eastern Mediterranean, the Black Sea corridor, and direct arcs toward Iran without relying entirely on Gulf basing.
This expands optionality.
Optionality is the key word.
When you pre position tankers in multiple European nodes, you are building a distributed refueling lattice. That reduces dependence on a single base such as Diego Garcia or Gulf states that may hesitate politically.
This signals three things.
One. Strike plans are mature enough to require real logistics rehearsal.
Two. Command wants redundancy in basing and routing.
Three. Escalation control is being engineered before any kinetic event.
quote:
It's part of the logistics bridge. When I deployed to Iraqi our C-17 refueled over the Black Sea. Those tankers are perfectly positioned for C-17s coming out of Ramstein.
If the north was an option we'd be putting assets in Turkey. Incirlik would be perfect, but the Turks want nothing to do with this one.
Georgia and Armenia are too close to Russia.
Page 151 of 151
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News