- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Very interesting podcast about the P. Diddy situation
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't get the conspiracy theories?
Yes you do
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
So the escort dudes who particapated they could be in trouble?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:24 am to Jeb Busch Lite
quote:
Yes you do
Mega rich mega star is a degenerate.
It's nothing special and has been a meme since Sumer.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Because he has evidence of powerful players engaged in illegal sexual activity that will upend the deep state, supposedly.
I don't get the conspiracy theories?
Why would Diddy be killed?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:24 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So the escort dudes who particapated they could be in trouble?
I don't know the details so give me an idea of what they'd be accused of doing, specifically.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:24 am to WhiteMandingo
quote:
He better have made copies and sent them to multiple lawyers for reporters. Because if the fbi has the only copies they are already destroyed
THIS.
I have 1,000 x more confidence in letting Bill Cosby pour my first drink today than the current DOJ allowing all of the evidence here being released.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:25 am to Jake88
quote:
Why are yall wasting time on some rando's podcast? Two people just bullshitting? No thanks.
I’m not saying these guys know anything.
But why do you watch two randos on the tv?
I had no idea who David Muir was before the debate, to me he’s some rando.
What’s funny is I was watching one of Trump’s rallies on YouTube and a David Muir ad came on. A name you can trust! It was so laughable. That was abc trying to run cover for the debate.
Or instead of randos, what makes Whoopi and Sonny worth watching? It’s just celebrities bullshitting.
This post was edited on 9/21/24 at 8:31 am
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:26 am to FLTech
I gt this feeling they parade this charade in front of us and we take our eyes off focus of God.
Instead of action, we wait for 6-year-out clues on a time wheel and expect that things will be clean by 2040.
This is all a dupe.
Instead of action, we wait for 6-year-out clues on a time wheel and expect that things will be clean by 2040.
This is all a dupe.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:26 am to dgnx6
quote:I don't.
But why do you watch two randos on the tv?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:27 am to Jake88
quote:
Because he has evidence of powerful players engaged in illegal sexual activity t
I get this with Epstein (underage kids)
Is that what Diddy's accused of in the indictment?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:27 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Could be a crazy October surprise.
Should be, but c'mon.
Harvey Weinstein
Jeffrey Epstein
and now Diddy.
What of any substance will impact any of those on "the list"?
Anyone remember Heidi Fleiss? She came out just fine. Even ended up on Doctor Drew and Celebrity Big Brother.
There was like one NYC official brought down from all that, and not even directly, IIRC.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Diddy paying people and having them participate in the illegal acts = organization
It was more a response this. Me and the wife were discussing this and i had questioned that if he had paid sex workers to do freak offs to ppl that are drugged up can they be in trouble under the racketeering law. Female or male escort participants
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I don't know. I'm just repeating the fantasies of many on this board. They've worked Obama into this somehow in the past.
Is that what Diddy's accused of in the indictment?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:29 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Anyone remember Heidi Fleiss? She came out just fine.
What was the conspiracy with her?
quote:
here was like one NYC official brought down from all that
Wasn't she based in California?
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Mega rich mega star is a degenerate.
Well he’s more than a degenerate I’d say. He’s being charged with sex trafficking.
And he’s got major connections with multiple entertainment icons/billionaires, many who have said themselves have attended his “parties”. It doesn’t take some tinfoil hat whacko to suspect that there is a lot more to the story
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:29 am to FLTech
Unless any of these pedophiles are associated with Trump, NOTHING is going to happen
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is that what Diddy's accused of in the indictment?
Yes he is
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:31 am to Jake88
quote:
Because he has evidence of powerful players engaged in illegal sexual activity that will upend the deep state, supposedly.
If he did it’s very likely that the powers that be have them on the blackmail list as well and would never allow some rapper getting busted to mess up their leverage.
It’s much more likely this is a cleanup op by the FBI to remove an annoyance, take away any physical evidence before Trump potentially takes office and keep any potential splash back from impacting the US and Israeli IC.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would Diddy be killed?
Why wouldn’t he be killed? Do you think Epstein committed suicide? And it was just a huge coincidence that James Comey’s daughter, Maurene Comey, was the lead prosecutor on the Ghislane Maxwell trial? These elites get so lucky with all of these coincidences.
Posted on 9/21/24 at 8:32 am to SDVTiger
quote:
t if he had paid sex workers to do freak offs to ppl that are drugged up can they be in trouble under the racketeering law. Female or male escort participants
I think they could be charged individually if they participated in the drugging.
RICO is hard enough to prove on its own, so I don't think they'd try to lump them into that when they could just charged them directly.
The point of RICO is to get the head of the organization where you don't have direct proof that they did/ordered any crimes. It's guilt by association with the underlings who are the ones who commit the predicate acts as part of the organization.
They'd probably just argue they were drugged, too, which makes them victims, but, again, I don't know the fine details.
Popular
Back to top


1







