- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:16 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
So predictable.
Yet so spot on.
quote:
Slip and fall?
Tax. You?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:22 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
No court will back this up, including the Supreme Court. A Trump Truth post is not legal.
I pray it gets there.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:22 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
You dumb idiot.
moron.
imbecile
So predictable.
100% accurate and factual tho
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:23 pm to SallysHuman
Who are these MFers who took advantage of ole Joe?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:25 pm to stout
quote:
He can cancel EOs without the SC backing it.
Pardons are another story
Correct.
With the pardons you have to show it was a forgery/done without the potato's knowledge).
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:26 pm to Codythetiger
Trump’s pronouncement has zero effect
On Biden’s actions, auto pen or open..
I learned last night that a pardon doesn’t have to have a signature…
On Biden’s actions, auto pen or open..
I learned last night that a pardon doesn’t have to have a signature…
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:27 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
100% accurate and factual tho
How soon before Hunter is arrested? 6 months? A year?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:30 pm to Codythetiger
quote:Only if a "clenched booty" is indicative of complete unconcern and mild amusement.
some bootys just clenched
This "proclamation" has no effect whatsoever in the real world. Its sole purpose is to excite Trump's villagers.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:31 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
This "proclamation" has no effect whatsoever in the real world. Its sole purpose is to excite Trump's villagers.
Wrong. Uphill battle…but it will end up in Court.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:32 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
How soon before Hunter is arrested? 6 months? A year?
Doubling down on this binary thinking simpleton angle?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:32 pm to VoxDawg
quote:I think that Trump only hires attorneys who tell him what he wants to hear.
You don't think the White House counsel advised them at all on this matter?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:34 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I think that Trump only hires attorneys who tell him what he wants to hear.
That’s a silly position.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Sure.
This "proclamation" has no effect whatsoever in the real world. Its sole purpose is to excite Trump's villagers.quote:
Wrong. Uphill battle…but it will end up in Court.
Trump has painted himself into a corner, so now he HAS to try and defend this nonsense in court.
And his chance of success is about 0.001 percent. Yeah, definitely an "uphill battle."
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:35 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
No court will back this up, including the Supreme Court. A Trump Truth post is not legal.
Right because the Constitution has a clause for autopen signatures on legal documents operated by staffers
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:36 pm to stout
quote:No, he cannot.
He can cancel EOs without the SC backing it.
He can REVOKE them, such that they have no effect after the date of revocation, but he most-definitely cannot "cancel" them retroactively.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:36 pm to VoxDawg
Hopefully this is a signal that Blondi will get off her arse and prosecute someone pardoned by Autopen.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:37 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Sure. Trump has painted himself into a corner, so now he HAS to try and defend this nonsense in court. And his chance of success is about 0.001 percent. Yeah, definitely an "uphill battle."
Maybe. Depends on how much discovery is allowed. I would love to see what some of the staffers were saying in emails. You wouldn’t?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 6:38 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Right because the Constitution has a clause for autopen signatures on legal documents operated by staffers
Longstanding precedent that autopen is ok. As long as the President directs it.
Popular
Back to top


2






