Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Who is more worthless? People paid to protest or welfare recipients? | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Who is more worthless? People paid to protest or welfare recipients?

Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:04 am to
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12489 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Poliboard you retard
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
14534 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:16 am to
Two sides of the same coin.....
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:16 am to
quote:

LMFAO paid protesters. This place is hilarious. Who the frick is paying for protesters?



Should ummm... Should we tell him?
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:18 am to
quote:

They may get free food and free transportation, but I don't consider that "getting paid".


that is compensation, no matter how u try to spin it
Posted by Loungefly85
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2016
7930 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:19 am to
quote:

selling their democratic right

quote:

that have made enough money


Why do you hate freedom and success, Commie? You sound right out of Marx.


Just messing with ya. Street agitators, Soros, and welfare hoodrats are all equally the worst.
Posted by rd280z
Richmond
Member since Jan 2007
2484 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:20 am to
Although there is a lot of welfare fraud, there are plenty of people that need the help.
Paid protestors on the other hand are worthless!
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85760 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:22 am to
I guess, if you want to get outraged about free ham sandwiches, so be it

but that is far different than the Lizard King Soros flying professional protesters all around the world to disrupt society in order to fulfill his lifelong mission of creating a One World Government
This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 8:23 am
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:30 am to
we're both right. the people that earn a living doing it are few and far between but a lot of the people that dont receive $10 when its all said and done are only attending because of the cash that someone got that influenced them to.

i hate them too. but this post was more directed at the small percentage that actually get on buses and travel protest to protest year round and are paid cash
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85760 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:34 am to
quote:

we're both right


ehhhh

quote:

a lot of the people that dont receive $10 when its all said and done are only attending because of the cash that someone got that influenced them to.


that's just marketing and happens for all kinds of events

who cares?

quote:

this post was more directed at the small percentage that actually get on buses and travel protest to protest year round and are paid cash


are these people that much different than lobbyist?

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:44 am to
At least lobbyists are honest wih their intention. The media makes it out like "a million people showed up to protest (insert random cause) so people are obviously very against it/ upset". The fact is just by pumping money into it Soros could have 500,000 show up to support banning fried chicken. At some point it devalues all other americans right to protest with what little free time most people can spare, when you have people doing it for causes they don't actually believe in as a full time job
This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 8:45 am
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58417 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:48 am to
quote:

hey may get free food and free transportation, but I don't consider that "getting paid".
thats getting paid. you take that free stuff away most wouldnt be there.,
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85760 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:49 am to
The problem with your premise the vast majority of these people do believe in what they are protesting

Would the same number show up if they didn't get free rides or free food? Probably not. But that doesn't mean that the ones that only show up because of the free stuff do not believe what they are protesting

Again...you are greatly under valuing the power of emotional appeal and groupthink




This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 8:49 am
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58417 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Or is this just one of those things we're supposed believe without evidence like widespread voter fraud?
LINK
LINK
I guess you missed these back a few elections ago.
This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 8:52 am
Posted by LSUBFA83
Member since May 2012
4149 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:10 am to
Those types of examples are egregious but hardly widespread.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
21841 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

would estimate 20-60% either directly or indirectly receive compensation for attending the 20,000 to 500,000 protester marches we see on tv




Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:14 am to
quote:

People paid to protest or welfare recipients?





Is there a difference?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58626 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:15 am to
quote:

People paid to protest


I'm going with the paid protesters. Their activities help perpetuate false narratives (that being that something is far more mob-rilingly controversial than it actually is). To me, their actions are more destructive than the leaches drinking their 40oz while sitting on their porches and watching traffic go by.

If we're going to get technical about the wording the welfare leaches still win out because apparently they have so much worth the government is willing to give them money just because they exist.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

guess you missed these back a few elections ago

I'm talking about the "millions" of cases of voters fraud like our president has been bitching about. Enough to influence elections.

There is no evidence to show that exists.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:21 am to
No
You just think what they are protesting about is worthless.

We wouldn't have this great nation without the 1st amendment and protesting
Posted by Skeeter07
Nw louisiana
Member since Oct 2015
127 posts
Posted on 3/2/17 at 9:27 am to
I would bet that most of those names are on both rosters.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram