- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why Are White Men Stockpiling Guns?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:49 pm to CollegeFBRules
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:49 pm to CollegeFBRules
Social science is not science as properly understood
0
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:49 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:Everyone I know that has a bunch of guns? Either they have different guns for different game, or they just like shooting guns
Why Are White Men Stockpiling Guns?
I do know a guy who is convinced the end of the world is coming, and he wants to be ready.
I don't know who they sampled, but I would wager that I know more white gun owners.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:49 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
According to a growing number of scientific studies, the kind of man who stockpiles weapons or applies for a concealed-carry license meets a very specific profile.
What is considered stockpiling?
I can think of several specific profiles that own multiple guns that most likely were not included on this data inclusion.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:50 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
100% - this is actually an excellent example of the cross section the OP speaks to. Look at the responses, I think it’s an excellent indication.
Then your line of thinking is all fricked up.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:50 pm to CollegeFBRules
that’s a short sighted point and so is the OP. Straight white men have always and will always be the primary market for firearms and regardless of what you think that has very little to do with “being afraid of the world we live in”
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:50 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:Anyone who responds with a question or lack of insults or aggressive commentary.
Such as what?
That is kind of up to you though.
quote:I would hope you would hold yourself to a higher standard.
I’m to be held to a standard above the mouth breathers that abundantly populate this board?
Again, that is up to you though.
The benefit of anonymity is that how you are viewed on here is irrelevant.
Personal attacks and opinions don’t matter, and if you take them as personal, it is an aspect of this website’s impact that should be re-evaluated.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:51 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:Good grief. This is like a back person walking up to a white guy... calling him a racist piece of isht, hen saying “see I told you” when the guy punches him in he mouth.
100% - this is actually an excellent example of the cross section the OP speaks to. Look at the responses, I think it’s an excellent indication
When you provoke people, and they respond, you’ve only proven they were provoked.
This post was edited on 5/19/18 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I don’t get off on it or accept it as fact. It’s probably a BS study. I just love trolling you people
Thanks for at least admitting it.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:4cubbies
What the frick happened to you?
is
CollegeFBRules
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:52 pm to upgrayedd
Y’all post enough of your own BS on here you should be able to handle a little back the other way
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:52 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I legit want to better evaluate the gun issue in this country and you clowns think I’ve become some idiot who flings shite at the walls. What in the hell happened to actually being able to reevaluate positions?
I actually do still like this board, and there are some of you that are still fun to have a decent conversation with.
I actually do still like this board, and there are some of you that are still fun to have a decent conversation with.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 1:53 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Good grief. This is like a back person walking up to a white guy... calling him a racist piece of isht, hen saying “see I told you” when the guy punches him in he mouth.
Go check out the video of the PC debate in the last thread I started. Michael Eric Dyson basically does this for an hour rather than actually debate the actual topic.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:00 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:I don’t think they were actually that effective, but that is a whole other topic.
Uh, why do you think the Russian ads during the election were so effective? They targeted people based on their language and post history.
I will agree that, to a certain extent, your stance has merit, but it is a much smaller grouping, IMO.
Taking offense to being called a racist and becoming angry in response wouldn’t be a sufficient reasoning to believe that that individual is racist.
Neither would taking offense to the commentary offered in the OP.
What percentage of those who respond negatively to being painted, well, negatively do you believe are truly as presented by the paper?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:01 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Probably quite low, but that would be a different study.
What is the gun crime rate of the "White Men Stockpiling Guns"? I'm curious as to how t statistically significant that is
I own two shotguns: one gauge for dove and one for quail. I own two rifles, for different game. I own two handguns: one for the house and one for the truck.
This study is about the guys who own two gun-safes full of weapons. That sort of obsessive-compulsive hoarding is interesting and worthy of study.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:02 pm to Taxing Authority
This legitimately is nothing like the ridiculous example you just gave.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:02 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:You should pick better source material.
I legit want to better evaluate the gun issue in this country and
quote:When you post it.. what else are we supposed to think?
you clowns think I’ve become some idiot who flings shite at the walls.
quote:Use actual data. Not bullshite agenda-driven pieces.
What in the hell happened to actually being able to reevaluate positions?
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:03 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:Sure it is.
This legitimately is nothing like the ridiculous example you just gave.
Both contend that a negative character aspect resulting in a subsequent negative reaction is enough evidence to make a judgement call on the individual’s character as a whole.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:03 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
ou must have me confused with someone else.
Afraid not
LINK
quote:
Guns have never been harder to get than now. I also think it’s silly to blame “guns” for teen shootings when we have an entire genre of “first person shooter” games.
Kids are getting the idea that shooting up a venue is a good idea. But that idea has come a long after guns were invented.
If you don't think that first person shooters are a factor you sure picked the most fricked up way possible to voice that opinion.
Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:03 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
This legitimately is nothing like the ridiculous example you just gave.
just because you don’t realize it, doesn’t make it so. Posted on 5/19/18 at 2:05 pm to Taxing Authority
Perhaps you can elaborate on your previous comments about first person shooter video games? You thought it pertinent to bring them up in the other thread. Please tell us why.
Page 8 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News