Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Why is no one talking about Brazil?! | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Why is no one talking about Brazil?!

Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:43 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

The AP, Reuters, and ABC News
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57428 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Why is this big?


Why do you think?
Posted by MasterDigger
Member since Nov 2019
2810 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:54 am to
Brazilians Monitored and Silenced leading up to election... Just like US Citizens:
quote:

Serious denunciation by @rodrigomarcial_ .. councilor of the city of Curitiba PR Brazil .. he reports that the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) hired a private company, Partners Comunicação Integrada, to monitor Brazilian citizens on the internet in September/22
quote:

The company used keywords and themes defined by STE to identify and evaluate publications as positive or negative and even georeference who was positioning themselves on the internet.
quote:

his company, according to him, received powers that not even the TSE should have, at all times effectively monitoring and enabling censorship. He continues.. "It sounds like a horror movie, it sounds like science fiction, but that's what the TSE did in our country."


LINK
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

The AP, Reuters, and ABC News

What a complete asswipe you are.

So you dont think the AP, Reuters, and ABC are reputable even when confirming the same story.

Tell me, which news sites do you deem as reputable?

Of course, you won't post a response because the ceiling of your intellectual capacity is posting a gutless emoji.
Posted by DaleGribble
Bend, OR
Member since Sep 2014
6821 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Tell me, which news sites do you deem as reputable?



I'll play. "none of them". Journalism is dead. Propaganda is the coin of the realm.
Posted by Texaggie96
Member since Dec 2018
1381 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:20 pm to
I know when I'm staging a coup, I always reach out to my conspiracy bros in America to give them the 411.

But hey keep this on the down low so they don't see it coming, ok?

You guys will believe anything :)
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:21 pm to
thebradfordfile

3h
Biden is close to laundering $100 billion through Ukraine, so naturally the media is focused on Elon Musk.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

Let me guess you believed the russia dossier

Much of the Russia Dossier couldnt be verified.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 12:20 am to
quote:

Every news story, to you, involves a conspiracy.


That's because every news story is a fricking lie. We know this to be a goddamn fact after the CIA declared in front of the fricking senate that their goal for the US is that each and every thing we Americans hear in the media is a lie.

Furthermore, what "conspiracy theory" did I relay? All I said is that I made a thread on this the other day and it was unjustly anchored. I even made an accurate prediction as to how the mods would handle it when someone else made the same goddamn thread.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 12:22 am
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87199 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 12:37 am to
quote:

Much of the Russia Dossier couldnt be verified.


None of it could. Are you still in denial? It was all a lie by the Hillary campaign and DNC
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87199 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 12:39 am to
quote:

dont think the AP, Reuters, and ABC are reputable even when confirming the same story.


No. They’ve parroted the same repeated lies for the better part or 8 years.

There are numerous memes and videos of the MSM news anchors and headlines using the same language and it being a lie

“Threat to our democracy”

“Russian agent”

“Trump calls Nazi’s fine people”

This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 12:40 am
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26535 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 12:57 am to
Breitbart, gateway pundit, epoch times, etc all do the same parroting.

Nobody should believe any media company 100% of the time.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 1:50 am to
quote:

I know when I'm staging a coup, I always reach out to my conspiracy bros in America to give them the 411.

But hey keep this on the down low so they don't see it coming, ok?

You guys will believe anything :)




What is the point of making this post? It has no bearing whatsoever on the subject at hand.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 1:51 am
Posted by GusAU
Member since Mar 2014
4960 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:06 am to
quote:

N.O. via West-Cal

Have you always been a brain dead moronic idiot?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15465 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:28 am to
They knew what they were creating before they began to create them. It is by design.

John Doe is in control.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15465 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:36 am to
quote:

Of course you can't substantiate what was never really investigated.

Don't look, then claim you didn't see anything out of place.


Leave Georgia out of this.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136810 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:46 am to
quote:

The AP, Reuters, and ABC News have all reported on the Defense Ministers' signed report on the election.
Indeed.
Do you know what they oddly haven't done?
They haven't produced the report!
At least TTBOMK they haven't.

The Defense Ministers Report is said to have identified "flaws" in Brazil's electoral process. But those flaws are unspecified in your sources. Why? What were they?

Also, what specifically are Bolsonaro’s concerns? Do you know? That would seem an important precept in the articles you quote. Yet those specifics are absent too.

Here are fill-ins for at least some of the missing details:
Apparently there are six models of voting machines used in Brazil. They range from a 2009 model to the newest, a 2020 model. Earlier models were made by Procomp. The most recent by Positivo Tecnologia. Both Procomp and Positivo are Brazilian firms. One difference is the Procomps employ removable flash drives, while the Positivos record all input data on a permanent internal hard drive.
Polling stations often employed a mix of the Procomp and Positivo machines. Election observers claim vote tallies on older model machines may have been skewed as much as 20% against Bolsonaro.

Now if that is true, if machines side-by-side, across wide regions, generated result differentials, that would seem to be significant. What does the "Defense Ministers' signed report on the election" say about that? You don't know, because the news outlets you source aren't discussing it.

One other troubling matter. You cite the AP, Reuters, ABC. You could have cited CNN, PBS, CBS, and NBC as well. Each wrote remarkably similar pieces. "Remarkably similar" meaning identical phraseology. If you turned up with content that similar to your classmate's on an essay exam in school, your teacher would justifiably suspect you cheated.

This appears to be yet another case of the MSM employing single source, multioutlet reporting. In other words, your outlets are parroting someone else's work ... or propaganda.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15465 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:51 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136810 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:59 am to
quote:

Much of the Russia Dossier couldnt be verified.
Yet that was NOT the nature of contemporary MSM reporting at all, now was it.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15465 posts
Posted on 11/30/22 at 2:59 am to
quote:

What a complete asswipe you are.

So you dont think the AP, Reuters, and ABC are reputable even when confirming the same story.

Tell me, which news sites do you deem as reputable?

Of course, you won't post a response because the ceiling of your intellectual capacity is posting a gutless emoji.


You must have a really big moat around your home.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram