- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:45 pm to Toomer Deplorable
And this is how you know they cheated. Lax voting requirements were put in place for an “emergency”, but here we are 4 years later and they are still finding reasons to keep them around.
Truth is, the people that they try so hard to get to “vote” for them don’t give a shite about politics, their neighborhoods or their country and they would never win without cheating
Truth is, the people that they try so hard to get to “vote” for them don’t give a shite about politics, their neighborhoods or their country and they would never win without cheating
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:49 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Are you trying to claim there was not a massive increase in "indefinitely confined" voters while their rejection rates also became next to zero?
There was a marked increase but not aware of any reporting on rejection rates.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:49 pm to FooManChoo
Worked last time
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:53 pm to POTUS2024
These fracking condescending prack sumbeaches continue to shout from the mountain top that voting privileges are being threatened along with 'democracy'.
Yet, I suppose with mail in/absentee and extended voting periods this sort of washes out that voting is restricted. It is wide open now compared to the past.
Freaking people flock to Target on the Friday after Thanksgiving but can't vote on one day? There should always be some leeway for deserving folks such as those overseas, esp. military, and those with medical/transportation issues, etc. But voting should be on one for the most part one day, with these exceptions.
Yet, I suppose with mail in/absentee and extended voting periods this sort of washes out that voting is restricted. It is wide open now compared to the past.
Freaking people flock to Target on the Friday after Thanksgiving but can't vote on one day? There should always be some leeway for deserving folks such as those overseas, esp. military, and those with medical/transportation issues, etc. But voting should be on one for the most part one day, with these exceptions.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:05 pm to texridder
quote:
There was a marked increase but not aware of any reporting on rejection rates.
It was more then a "marked increase" and I am not surprised in the least you discount the laughably low, compared to previous elections, rejection rates.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:27 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
It was more then a "marked increase" and I am not surprised in the least you discount the laughably low, compared to previous elections, rejection rates.
First of all, I said that I was not aware of any reporting of rejection rates on indefinitely confinded voters, not voters as a whole.
Secondly, if you are claiming low rejection rates on all absentee ballots as a whole, you are full of shite. It didn't happen. Prove it or FO.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:33 pm to texridder
Is there any law that would prohibit someone from stuffing the boxes with blank paper so there is no room for ballots?
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:51 pm to texridder
quote:
First of all, I said that I was not aware of any reporting of rejection rates on indefinitely confinded voters, not voters as a whole.
Secondly, if you are claiming low rejection rates on all absentee ballots as a whole, you are full of shite. It didn't happen. Prove it or FO.
Are you playing dumb or are you really this stupid?
I'm going with B, but will play along.
The rejection rates for the "indefinitely confined" ballots were laughably, statistically impossibly, low compared to previous election's "indefinitely confined" ballots.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:51 pm to 756
quote:
Is there any law that would prohibit someone from stuffing the boxes with blank paper so there is no room for ballots?
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:56 pm to 756
quote:
Is there any law that would prohibit someone from stuffing the boxes with blank paper so there is no room for ballots?
Print out thousands of parody ballots (with SATIRE clearly printed) in the names of liberals you know. Make those boxes overflow.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:36 pm to texridder
quote:
First of all, I said that I was not aware of any reporting of rejection rates on indefinitely confinded voters, not voters as a whole.
Secondly, if you are claiming low rejection rates on all absentee ballots as a whole, you are full of shite. It didn't happen. Prove it or FO.
Ok, then why don't you provide evidence that voting currently in the US is restricted? Is it because you and your ilk's assumption is that black folks nowadays have no ID to be qualified to pull the trigger for a candidate? It seems that you and your ilk assume that certain folks are of lessor intelligence than you.
In fact, you and your ilk are racists. In fact, I would wager that you don't give a crap's arse about anything, as long as whatever Dem is elected - so you all can keep the plantation of votes going - now including illegal aliens - not 'migrants' - illegal aliens as defined by US law, which is not being followed or addressed by the current admin.
And to end by partially quoting you - FO.
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:41 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
The rejection rates for the "indefinitely confined" ballots were laughably, statistically impossibly, low compared to previous election's "indefinitely confined" ballots.
How about a source for that.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:43 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Wisconsin is a very corrupt state. Will always be. Dems will win there.
Posted on 7/5/24 at 10:58 pm to texridder
A Sheriff up in Wisconsin blew the whistle on the ballot harvesting in old age homes and memory care units.
Here’s a source from the Wisconsin legislature on the election fraud:
Link: LINK
Here’s a source from the Wisconsin legislature on the election fraud:
quote:
MADISON, WI – Earlier today, Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling presented the results of an investigation into allegations of election fraud in a Racine-area nursing home. Sheriff Schmaling concluded that the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) violated state law when it suspended the requirement for special voting deputies to be present when nursing home residents vote via absentee ballot. The suspension applied to the spring and fall 2020 elections, and Sheriff Schmaling’s investigation found evidence of eight fraudulently cast ballots.
Link: LINK
Posted on 7/6/24 at 1:26 am to Eighteen
quote:
Conservatives just need to ready to stuff the boxes as well. Fill them to the top and make them overflow to show the absurdity
Better yet if you flood the system with thousands and thousands of extra ballets get the entire mail in ballet system thrown out.
Posted on 7/6/24 at 1:46 am to VOR
quote:
Still no real proof of illegality with ballot boxes…
Hysterical.
Posted on 7/6/24 at 2:26 am to VOR
Hey VOR/mallday! Another drive by post where you don’t stick around to own up to how dumb it was? Coward.
Posted on 7/6/24 at 4:30 am to Scorpio58
quote:
Are these boxes fireproof?
We know the ones in Atlanta are waterproof.
Posted on 7/6/24 at 6:07 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Good strategy for the Dems. They don't have a viable candidate so they can just create the votes they need to win.
it worked in 2020...if it aint broke...
This post was edited on 7/6/24 at 6:08 am
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News