- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You Don’t Hate The Media Enough: PBS Edition
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:10 pm to Dig Deep
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:10 pm to Dig Deep
quote:You'll need to give us the math on that one, and show your work.
he started reaching for it while the vehicle was stationary.quote:
And? It saved lives.
Because it seems to me that if she drives away and is arrested two hours later at her house, ZERO persons die.
Yet when Agent Fife chose to unload into her vehicle rather than letting her just drive away, ONE person died.
That looks TO ME like a net LOSS of life, not a net positive number of "saved lives."
6
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:11 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
That looks TO ME like a net LOSS of life, not a net positive number of "saved lives."
Worth it.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:12 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
That looks TO ME like a net LOSS of life, not a net positive number of "saved lives."
If a domestic terrorist is killed, doesn't that essentially save other lives?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:13 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You are correct that the weapon did not "clear leather" until the vehicle was moving, but he started reaching for it while the vehicle was stationary.
That's not true. View of his gun and hand is blocked by the other agent. Her tires are already spinning forward before his gun and hand come into view. You can assume he was already reaching for it to help your narrative, but the video doesn't show that.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:15 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Yet when Agent Fife chose to unload into her vehicle
Perhaps he isn’t a person that wanted to be assaulted with a vehicle and feared for his life.
It was a crazy leftist that attacked him after all.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:16 pm to Nurbis
quote:
but the video doesn't show that.
Facts are irrelevant to shim.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:17 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
but in a few weeks things will play-out exactly as we have outlined
What will play out as who has outlined?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:18 pm to LuckyTiger
PBS is about to go under so frick whatever they have to say - They are about to be out of business
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:22 pm to LuckyTiger
Knocked implies contact.
It’s impossible to hate the media enough.
It’s impossible to hate the media enough.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:23 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You are correct that the weapon did not "clear leather" until the vehicle was moving, but he started reaching for it while the vehicle was stationary.
So he was astute?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:25 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
but he started reaching for it while the vehicle was stationary.
Sounds like he read the situation perfectly, if true.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:25 pm to LuckyTiger
Wasn't pbs one of the ones claiming there was no attempted assassination on trump because the bullet just hit a monitor or some shite? One of the msm tried their damndest to downplay and minimize that attack.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:26 pm to LuckyTiger
I hope they get called out for their bullshite every day all day. It's time to quit being the silent majority.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:27 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
No one who fails to fondle Trump's rhetorical ballsack will EVER "win" a discussion on this forum, but in a few weeks things will play-out exactly as we have outlined, and you Trumpists will again be whining about the horrific injustice of it all.
You have yet to put forth anything except ad hominem attacks that aren't worth discussing. Get off your high horse.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:33 pm to LuckyTiger
Did she use the force on him to knock him backwards?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:37 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You'll need to give us the math on that one, and show your work. Because it seems to me that if she drives away and is arrested two hours later at her house, ZERO persons die. Yet when Agent Fife chose to unload into her vehicle rather than letting her just drive away, ONE person died. That looks TO ME like a net LOSS of life, not a net positive number of "saved lives."
We don’t apply “what ifs” and “whataboutisms” in the legal standard here.
We only apply the following: did the officer have a reasonable expectation of being imminently seriously injured in that split second to justify the use of self defense?
A car can be considered a dangerous weapon in every jurisdiction. Sure, if you pull a gun on me, and I do not react, and you don’t shoot me, then yes, ZERO persons die.
But if I react by pulling a gun and shooting you dead, I am legally justified in doing so if I had a reasonable expectation of being seriously injured. Your intent doesn’t matter. Maybe you didn’t intend to shoot me; maybe you just wanted to scare me or maybe you were just acting reckless, it matters not. Unfortunately, you end up dead and I acted in self defense.
Now, I will not be surprised at all if Minnesota officials charge this officer with homicide. Not because he committed an unjustified homicide but because we live in an age where prosecutions have become political. We had an officer here in Georgia charged with homicide for shooting a suspect after he resisted arrest, fought with officers, stole an officer’s taser, and pointed the taser at officers. That was a ridiculous prosecution but it was amidst the George Floyd/BLM reign of terror and riots. It was a political prosecution and almost two years of bull shite had to pass before the charges were dropped because they were unsustainable from a point of law. And everyone knows if Trump is not President, if he never enters politics, he never gets charged for overestimating the value of his property. That was a political prosecution. Everyone knows that if they’re being honest.
The mayor of minneapolis, along with many other Democrat officials, have already publicly declared this officer a murderer. And given the Democrats’ stance on enforcement of immigration laws, everyone with a pulse knows this would be a political prosecution. But that’s the time we find ourselves in.
Moreover, I don’t know how a legitimate state prosecution could happen because the FBI has taken control of the investigation. That means they control the evidence and access to it and so forth. Minnesota officials say that investigation must be shared with them. Well, I can tell you as a former federal prosecutor they are incorrect. They can make a request, but the federal government does not have to accommodate them. Moreover, there are immunity questions here that would have to be overcome. The law is not on their side, but I don’t expect that to stop them.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:46 pm to LuckyTiger
They love lying
Posted on 1/9/26 at 7:49 pm to LuckyTiger
And even after the ICE officer's cellphone vid proves PBS reporting as BS they will still not apologize or do a retraction.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 8:13 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
No one who fails to fondle Trump's rhetorical ballsack
He may be the only man who's ballsack you wouldn't fondle.
Do i win the discussion?
She was a trained anti ice protestor.
She escalated the situation.
You can argue for or against his response.
He has a legal obligation to uphold our immigration laws.
She has no legal obligation to block or impede his duties.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 8:14 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You are correct that the weapon did not "clear leather" until the vehicle was moving
and thats what matters
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News