- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Potentially huge NIL/Revenue Sharing news (memo sent out by college sports commision)
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:29 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The way this memo is worded, looks like any NIL deals secured by the school count towards revenue sharing pool, which would make sense why Kiffin is hesitant to sign a QB for huge money.
If I am interpreting this correctly, Tech just blew 1/4 of their pool on one player.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 3:37 pm
17
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:31 pm to Soggymoss
What a mess.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:31 pm to Soggymoss
What a soggymess
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:32 pm to Soggymoss
This technicality will be the downfall for ole miss trying to spend what they don't have.
Love it.
Love it.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:36 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
looks like any NIL deals secured by the school count towards revenue sharing pool
I think it’s only if that NIL deal didn’t exist at the time the player signed. So future NIL deals can’t offset the pool. Need to have those NIL deals already lined up right now sounds like.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:38 pm to Soggymoss
The boosters paying players out of pocket or on side if you will is no different than what Cam Newton got. Pretty sure that this part of process just started happening because nobody had rules. But I saw a year ago where it was stated that flat out paying players from booster is illegal. Maybe this is what makes them atleast try and look like it's Name Image and Likeness.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:39 pm to WestSideTiger
Yeah he clarified a little bit. So sounds like they should sign NIL deals before “picking” a school, otherwise any money promised to them comes out of that school’s revenue. I have a feeling quite a few of these deals signed already have destroyed a school’s share. It will also take time to secure NIL money and deals, which will hold up alot of signings. The clearinghouse will likely deny alot of the deals signed if their huge NIL deals like what Sorsby got. NIL also isn’t guaranteed money
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:40 pm to John Rambeaux
quote:
This technicality will be the downfall for ole miss trying to spend what they don't have. Love it.
Programs like Texas Tech and Ole Miss will ignore this and dare the ncaa to do anything about it.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:48 pm to Soggymoss
I’d assume whatever deal a school made with a player to this point can be changed if the player agrees. That player would then need to have faith the school will uphold their end though (and all done quietly).
For instance school says we’ll pay 100K this year and provide 400K in future NIL deals. The school can’t really guarantee that nor are they allowed to technically even if they know they have companies lined up that will provide whatever they ask.
For instance school says we’ll pay 100K this year and provide 400K in future NIL deals. The school can’t really guarantee that nor are they allowed to technically even if they know they have companies lined up that will provide whatever they ask.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:06 pm to Soggymoss
This is why Lane left ole miss
When everything trends back to equality with revenue share rules… you’re gonna want to be at a blue blood.
When everything trends back to equality with revenue share rules… you’re gonna want to be at a blue blood.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:08 pm to Soggymoss
Without the teeth or willingness to enforce this, it doesn’t matter.
Schools are going to test the limit and when the CSC realizes it can’t enforce anything, then the fed government will have to step in and clean this shite up. It’s just a matter of time.
Schools are going to test the limit and when the CSC realizes it can’t enforce anything, then the fed government will have to step in and clean this shite up. It’s just a matter of time.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:14 pm to Soggymoss
Wait, is the NCAA trying to get involved in the NCAA again?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:19 pm to Soggymoss
Explain this to me like I’m 5. I could be completely wrong here…
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
That doesn’t include extra actual NIL from Gordon, Canes, Nike, etc?
Can Campbell (at Texas Tech) just sign Sorsby to a huge NIL deal with Double Eagle?
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
That doesn’t include extra actual NIL from Gordon, Canes, Nike, etc?
Can Campbell (at Texas Tech) just sign Sorsby to a huge NIL deal with Double Eagle?
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:22 pm to Soggymoss
It remains to be seen if the Commission will have any teeth.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:22 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
That's the interpretation
quote:
Can Campbell (at Texas Tech) just sign Sorsby to a huge NIL deal with Double Eagle?
Yes. But those NIL deals are still subject to the Clearinghouse.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:28 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
No, you just can't pay them out of Rev Share upfront and reduce the Rev Share amount later on if a 3rd Party deal comes along.
So you can have say 13.5 million in Rev Share and another 25 million in 3rd Party deals. If you're smart, you sign your big fish out of Rev Share, and you offer fair market value to everyone else via the 3rd Party NIL deals.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:31 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
Correct
quote:
That doesn’t include extra actual NIL from Gordon, Canes, Nike, etc?
It does if the school secures the NIL deal. These deals would have to be secured by the student/agent apart from the school. These deals will also be subject to review by the clearinghouse who is supposed to reject any deals that are deemed above market value, which IMO deals that pay guys more than 1st round draft picks should be deemed that way and rejected (Sorsby deal)
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:31 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
So is this saying Rev Share + extra from NIL Collectives are all capped at 20.5M?
That's the interpretation
That memo doesn't say that.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:31 pm to Soggymoss
So is this the college version of a salary cap?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 4:33 pm to Soggymoss
quote:
If I am interpreting this correctly, Tech just blew 1/4 of their pool on one player.
There’s no entity that can enforce this.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News