Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Why not let the blue areas have their way. | Political Talk
Started By
Message

Why not let the blue areas have their way.

Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:49 pm
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5328 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:49 pm
Why not redirect all ice to the red areas that want them and work with them? Then get super nit picky with the federal funding to these blue states especially sanctuary cities. Make their lives completely miserable with fraud investigations. Let them live with the consequences of their actions. That seems like it would the best way to handle all this in the long run.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
17118 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:50 pm to
I like that idea.

Need more ICE in SC- we’d appreciate it.
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
8534 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:55 pm to
Should we just abandon red voters stuck in blue areas?
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
32728 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Why not let the blue areas have their way.
No


Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23510 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:57 pm to

Illegal immigrant populations in blue states are used to skew census numbers and provide those states with greater representation in the US House.

That representation is then used to force leftist policies on red states.
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
18246 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:57 pm to
Gotta deport as many as possible. These people have adverse effects on the country that you can’t imagine
Posted by SpecialK_88
Member since Dec 2025
273 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Why not redirect all ice to the red areas that want them and work with them? Then get super nit picky with the federal funding to these blue states especially sanctuary cities. Make their lives completely miserable with fraud investigations. Let them live with the consequences of their actions. That seems like it would the best way to handle all this in the long run.


Simple, because the admin is more concerned with making political statements than getting as many illegals as they can.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
5287 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:59 pm to
I said allow illegals in 2 or 3 cities. A huge amount t will inevitably flee to these couple of cities. It would be a nice social experiment.
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
5904 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:00 pm to
Because we know their state doesn’t enforce welfare laws or give a shite how their federal funds are used.
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5328 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Should we just abandon red voters stuck in blue areas?


That’s definitely the strongest argument against this approach. I’d say leave but you have to be wealthy to do that and there could be multiple things tying you to an area so I know it’s not that simple.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
28566 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:00 pm to
If you let them have their way you get Minnesota where our tax dollars are funding the world and the Democratic Party.

Fraud, Embezzlement, waste, lies, corruption.

Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9393 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Simple, because the admin is more concerned with making political statements than getting as many illegals as they can.


Funny how you don’t even realize how stupid of a statement this is. I’m not explaining to you why, I’m more interested to see if you’re smart enough to figure it out yourself
Posted by arktiger28
Member since Aug 2005
5328 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

If you let them have their way you get Minnesota where our tax dollars are funding the world and the Democratic Party. Fraud, Embezzlement, waste, lies, corruption.


Of course. Which is why I said you would have to get much stricter with federal funds to those areas.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2339 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Need more ICE in SC


This x100

Start in Saluda County.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
14243 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:05 pm to
Because we subsidize them will billions of dollars of aid every goddamned month, and there are no border checks to keep MS-13 from migrating from Maryland to Atlanta.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2339 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Funny how you don’t even realize how stupid of a statement this is. I’m not explaining to you why, I’m more interested to see if you’re smart enough to figure it out yourself


I was curious why the Admin wasn’t sending the NG to clean up crime in Red States before (Birmingham, NOLA, etc).
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
44699 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:06 pm to
The system will declare that it's "unconstitutional" to not give them massive funding.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45205 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:06 pm to
Because that is our land too.
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
9196 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:11 pm to
You really think blue area voters would stay in their blue areas?

No, they are like locusts and this has already been demonstrated in many states that were once strongly red but have started turning purple.

The ones who can afford to escape the consequences of their voting habits do….and then often bring their voting habits with them.

They are like a plague.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
18903 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Need more ICE in SC- we’d appreciate it.


And yall call yall selves a southern state. Smh
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram