- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why don’t R’s propose an Amendment that mandates the filibuster & sets the # of Justices?
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:21 am
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:21 am
7
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:24 am to SPEEDY
Get rid of the virtual filibuster.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:26 am to SPEEDY
Just pack the USSC with right wing extremist now.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:26 am to SPEEDY
Republicans get nothing done that’s why
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:26 am to SPEEDY
Because they are cowards
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:28 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Get rid of the virtual filibuster.
Yep.
Make the motherfrickers talk.
Easy to hide obstructionism when the mere threat stifles debate.
Even the most biased media would have to cover Dems actually holding the Senate floor for days to fight against spending cuts/lower taxes/no tranny surgeries.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:33 am to Twix 23
quote:
Just pack the USSC with right wing extremist now.
That doesn’t inoculate us from the problem. If they pack SCOTUS now with X justices democrats, when they are in power, will respond by packing it with 2X+1.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:35 am to Penrod
quote:
That doesn’t inoculate us from the problem. If they pack SCOTUS now with X justices democrats, when they are in power, will respond by packing it with 2X+1.
So we can finally all agree that the judiciary is a joke and make it irrelevant.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:41 am to Twix 23
quote:
So we can finally all agree that the judiciary is a joke and make it irrelevant.
I don’t agree with that. Remove the judiciary role in the balance of powers and American government would turn into a tyranny of the majority. Terrible take.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:49 am to SPEEDY
Because they're all part of the big scam. Term limits and full financials should be required
Posted on 1/23/26 at 7:51 am to Penrod
quote:
don’t agree with that. Remove the judiciary role in the balance of powers and American government would turn into a tyranny of the majority. Terrible take.
What’s the difference between tyranny of the majority and an extremist judiciary?
Posted on 1/23/26 at 8:41 am to CrazyCadillac
The Republican platform is “Vote for us we won’t do anything!”
Posted on 1/23/26 at 8:57 am to SPEEDY
Because they’re complicit in the downfall of our republic.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 8:58 am to Penrod
quote:
I don’t agree with that. Remove the judiciary role in the balance of powers and American government would turn into a tyranny of the majority. Terrible take.
You’re insufferable. We already live in a judicial tyranny.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 2:53 pm to Twix 23
quote:
What’s the difference between tyranny of the majority and an extremist judiciary?
Your implication that we have an extremest judiciary is way off base. We certainly have a few extremist judges, but our judiciary is very moderate.
When Biden was president his efforts to forgive student debt were repeatedly rebuffed by the courts. The democrats suffer court rebuffs just as the republicans do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News