- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
About the use of the word "murder" by DEM officials in official hearings.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:10 am
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:10 am
How can a sitting US Congressman, sitting in an official Congressional hearing on welfare/snap/medicare abuse totally ignore the subject of the hearing and lace their asinine attacks with words like "murder" and "innocent victims" and "captured children" in their bullshite allegations - instead of even tipping a hat to the SUBJECT of the hearing.
I thought their 'speech and debate' permission to lie and slander and prognosticate was limited to their 'speeches' to the empty chambers of the congress = or in their purchased political advertisements.
Should we not insist that a FORMAL HEARING concentrate on the subject at hand and adhere to at least honorable restraints, if not prohibitions from slander, from the participants?
But at the least - should we not expect the MEDIA to point out mercilessly the outright LIEs and SLANDERs by any and ALL congress critters, not just mealy mouthed constant attacks on conservatives.
I just don't know how any democrat these days can live with themselves if they support the absolute lying filth that totally consumes their 'leaders' commentary in the past two decades.
Just makes no sense to me.
edit:
ALSO - if the subject of the hearing is so abhorrent to the democrats that they even REFUSE to attend - should we not be able to assign their seats to anyone in congress who IS willing to sit thru the hearing???
Is there ANY topic or strategy by the Democrats that can be defended as HONEST or PRODUCTIVE or HONORABLE??
anything at ALL???
I thought their 'speech and debate' permission to lie and slander and prognosticate was limited to their 'speeches' to the empty chambers of the congress = or in their purchased political advertisements.
Should we not insist that a FORMAL HEARING concentrate on the subject at hand and adhere to at least honorable restraints, if not prohibitions from slander, from the participants?
But at the least - should we not expect the MEDIA to point out mercilessly the outright LIEs and SLANDERs by any and ALL congress critters, not just mealy mouthed constant attacks on conservatives.
I just don't know how any democrat these days can live with themselves if they support the absolute lying filth that totally consumes their 'leaders' commentary in the past two decades.
Just makes no sense to me.
edit:
ALSO - if the subject of the hearing is so abhorrent to the democrats that they even REFUSE to attend - should we not be able to assign their seats to anyone in congress who IS willing to sit thru the hearing???
Is there ANY topic or strategy by the Democrats that can be defended as HONEST or PRODUCTIVE or HONORABLE??
anything at ALL???
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 8:14 am
5
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:16 am to ChineseBandit58
I now understand why my flippant use of the word murder triggered people.
Thank you, and I'm sorry. We definitely killed some bad guys. We didn't murder them.
Thank you, and I'm sorry. We definitely killed some bad guys. We didn't murder them.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:17 am to ChineseBandit58
Don’t take it personally- the uncorrrupted - those of us with souls-never understand the corrupt. It’s biblical- the source of our disillusionment with man.
Hope you are well, old friend.
Hope you are well, old friend.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:24 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Don’t take it personally- the uncorrrupted - those of us with souls-never understand the corrupt. It’s biblical- the source of our disillusionment with man.
This You?
quote:
When I was younger and uncompromised and straight as an arrow I would never have sold out. Now- in 30 seconds. This is not a brag- just a sad reality . Give me 5m and watch me lie like a Democrat .
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:28 am to SallysHuman
But he never stated that he principles
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:42 am to ChineseBandit58
Debate Clause
Next question
Next question
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:43 am to SallysHuman
Ahh...the duality of man.
Actually-it appears to be the overriding theme of the day-discussing the nature of my corrupted soul with the kind lady next to me who is having the same thoughts as I look for worship times at a non-denominational church she favors. Suffering/loss/age makes us grapple with uncomfortable truths about ourselves and our fellow man, no?
Actually-it appears to be the overriding theme of the day-discussing the nature of my corrupted soul with the kind lady next to me who is having the same thoughts as I look for worship times at a non-denominational church she favors. Suffering/loss/age makes us grapple with uncomfortable truths about ourselves and our fellow man, no?
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:45 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Ahh...the duality of man.
Nah, I'm with ya, man... just thought it was funny when I happened to read your two posts back to back.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:26 am to ChineseBandit58
wishful thinking that democrates have any decency . Al Green was rolling yesterday, but his venue is limited to the next 9 months as is Jasmine
Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:29 am to ChineseBandit58
Asking congressmen, who are mostly sociopaths and narcissists, to actually do their jobs and not postulate, bloviate and parade around like peacocks, is asking a bit too much.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:32 am to GRTiger
quote:
I now understand why my flippant use of the word murder triggered people.
Thank you, and I'm sorry. We definitely killed some bad guys. We didn't murder them.
Killed is so aggressive, we unalived them.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:33 am to SallysHuman
quote:I have always assumed by your name, you were a lady, no?
quote:
Ahh...the duality of man.
Nah, I'm with ya, man... just thought it was funny when I happened to read your two posts back to back.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:42 am to tketaco
quote:
Debate Clause
If they wish to debate a topic not on the official agenda then they ought to devote equal amounts from their time for a response from the other side.
They use these hearings as free propaganda for unrelated issues.
But since democrats have no honor - no conscience - no logic - no capacity for true debate, they do as they always do = redefine the terms (debate is not the same as lies and fairy tales) - and lie/insult/exaggerate/aggrandize at the tax payer expense.
No a moral bone in their bodies
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:02 am to Diamondawg
quote:
have always assumed by your name, you were a lady, no?
Yes.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:09 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
No a moral bone in their bodies
I don't believe in god, but I'm convinced over half of Dems in congress and their voters are truly evil people. Freaking Demons.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:16 am to Lsupimp
quote:
It’s biblical
While I agree, I would call it spiritual. Biblical is the morally aligned subset of spiritual. Sacred Tradition is also a morally aligned subset of spiritual. Whereas demonic is a immorally aligned subset of spiritual.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:22 am to SludgeFactory
quote:
I don't believe in god,
Not to be degrading but you do.
UNLESS you are referring only to your definitions of all known religions.
Everyone believes in some higher power that is at least your arbiter of how you know the difference between “right” and “ wrong”.
God bless. :)
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 10:24 am
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:25 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Suffering/loss/age makes us grapple with uncomfortable truths about ourselves and our fellow man, no?
It do. It do indeed.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News