Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us OK. A little education on security clearances | Political Talk
Started By
Message
locked post

OK. A little education on security clearances

Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:16 pm
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:16 pm
Since very few of you know what it is.

You need a Security Clearance to enter certain federal facilities, or certain parts or buildings of some federal facilities. You also need a Security Clearance to view or possess documents or info deemed "secure."

For example, if I was a contractor and I was contracted to perform demolition at a Department of State embassy, I would have to have a Security Clearance.

If I was an architect, and I was contracted to design renovations at a secure facility, I would need a Security Clearance. The majority of Security Clearance holders work for PRIVATE COMPANIES.

Private companies that perform work for federal clients often require someone to have a clearance before being hired.

You don't forfeit your clearance when you leave a job. Its not tied to a job, but to a person. When you eave a job, you don't turn in a Security Clearance like a sheriffs badge. That's not at all how it works.

Also, just because you have a clearance, doesn't automatically grant you access to whatever secure information you want. You still have to have a reason (like designing a building) to get access to secure documents. (Like blueprints of a building to perform renovations on.)

Security Clearances expire, and the holder must go through a new application process to keep it. They are never revoked, unless the holder breaks the rules of maintaining a clearance.

Top Secret Clearances are simply a level above Security Clearances. They give you access to Top Secret facilities and information, when you have a valid reason to need this access.

So please, enough with the "Everyone should have their clearance taken when they leave their job".

That is ignorant, and not how the system works at all. You wouldn't have any private companies with enough people with clearances to do the work the federal government requires.

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
63545 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

So please, enough with the "Everyone should have their clearance taken when they leave their job".

That is ignorant, and not how the system works at all. You wouldn't have any private companies with enough people with clearances to do the work the federal government requires.


I have no problem with people getting clearances back if they need them for their jobs, but they should lose them when they leave their jobs.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Since very few of you know what it is.


You don't know either.

Apparently

John Brennan will never again be authorized to work for the government, as an employer or as a contractor, so he doesn't need his security clearance.

Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

You wouldn't have any private companies with enough people with clearances to do the work the federal government requires.



I have no issue with that.





We don't have to have all of those "secrets" from the American people. Secrets should be very few.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23468 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Top Secret Clearances are simply a level above Security Clearances.


"Top Secret" is a level of clearance. Levels are confidential, secret, and top secret.

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

I have no problem with people getting clearances back if they need them for their jobs, but they should lose them when they leave their jobs.


Functionally, this already happens.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51125 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

they should lose them when they leave their jobs.
You are ignorant. Each instance of granting clearance involves a thorough background check. That typically cannot happen in the time frame you obviously think it can. It's not like a light switch that you turn ON and OFF.
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
5055 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:30 pm to
It’s amazing the number of people that both want to privatize as much of the government and want people to lose their security clearances when they leave the government.

How the Hell is Boeing supposed to design the next generation of military jet without its engineers having security clearances?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
63545 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

You are ignorant. Each instance of granting clearance involves a thorough background check. That typically cannot happen in the time frame you obviously think it can. It's not like a light switch that you turn ON and OFF.


True enough. We couldn't possibly change the process or expedite it for people who had their clearance revoked simply because they left their job. That would be far too impossible for the federal government to navigate!
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

So please, enough with the "Everyone should have their clearance taken when they leave their job".





Yes, everyone should have their clearance suspended, at the very least, when they leave their job.


This post was edited on 8/20/18 at 2:36 pm
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23468 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

That typically cannot happen in the time frame you obviously think it can.


The government loses very qualified FTEs and contractors all the time because those people get attractive, immediate offers while they're waiting to have background checks, etc completed.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51125 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Top Secret" is a level of clearance. Levels are confidential, secret, and top secret.
Above Top Secret is SCI and SAP.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Functionally, this already happens.


Unfortunately these retards believe that having the clearance means you can walk right into any federal building that you want and access any documents you want.

As if John Brennan was still going to the NSA and looking over intercepts daily or something.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23468 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Above Top Secret is SCI and SAP.


Well obviously I'm not cleared to know about those.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
18887 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:35 pm to
No one has given a single reason as to why John Brennan should still have his clearance.

The SoP is fine but these things can be taken away, and Brennans was,rightfully so
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

quote:
Above Top Secret is SCI and SAP.



Well obviously I'm not cleared to know about those.




The highest is "I could tell you , but then I'd have to kill you"

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138316 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

BayouBlitz
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138316 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Security Clearances expire, and the holder must go through a new application process to keep it. They are never revoked, unless the holder breaks the rules of maintaining a clearance.


I believe this was the biggest reason used to justify what Trump did.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14463 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

I have no problem with people getting clearances back if they need them for their jobs, but they should lose them when they leave their jobs.


More Bureaucracy.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62724 posts
Posted on 8/20/18 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

How the Hell is Boeing supposed to design the next generation of military jet without its engineers having security clearances?
I'll take sophormoic false equivalences for $500, Alex.

Working on a military project != spouting bullshart on CNN. And... by definition one does not need a TS to spout BS on CNN. They are supposed to keep secret info... you know secret.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram