- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to Dale Murphy
quote:
Would rather the money be spent on coastal restoration than some of the other crap
So when has our state actually spent money on what they claim they’re going to spend it on.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to dek81572
I voted no... frick that shite
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:37 am to Dale Murphy
quote:
voted yes. Would rather the money be spent on coastal restoration than some of the other crap they'd likely spend it on.
Thats where im at..
Posted on 11/5/24 at 9:56 am to dek81572
It's a false argument. Are you ok for the state to receive funds from alternative use? at first you scream, Hell yeah" we need to get our share. All the while voting yes on the funding will be used by the climate hoaxers to say "see, they want alternative energy use"
if the vote was for wind and solar farms would you vote yes or no?
if the vote was for wind and solar farms would you vote yes or no?
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 9:57 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:01 am to dek81572
quote:
Yea or Nea and what is your reasoning?
I vote no to every one, every time. Fix the absolutely broken state constitution and stop these ridiculous amendments.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:02 am to dek81572
No, you cant win against Mother Nature, especially with Louisiana politicians in charge
This post was edited on 11/5/24 at 10:03 am
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:06 am to Dale Murphy
quote:
Would rather the money be spent on coastal restoration than some of the other crap they'd likely spend it on.
My sentiments exactly. Not sure i even agree with the state having this money to begin with but at least if it's dedicated to coastal restoration it will be spent there instead of some pet project that benefits no one but a bunch of politicians.
Posted on 11/5/24 at 10:07 am to dek81572
On the surface the it seems like a decent concept, but in the end I defaulted with a no. Louisiana has a nasty habit of putting crap in the constitution that doesn't belong there.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News