- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Delly on the Demond news
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:54 pm to LSBoosie
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:54 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
it’s him backing out of a contract with the school.
Didn’t the DT that was put off the team during the season sign a revenue sharing did this season like all the other players for LSU and they were able to part with him. That goes both ways.
It’s interesting because the portal is still open. If the same player had a change of heart during that period, what’s to stop him from jumping in the portal. He was still able to submit his papers to get in the portal.
0
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:54 pm to LSBoosie
quote:maybe, but this would be between Washington and Demond, no?
Also I can’t remember who said it, but earlier this week some said something to the effect of the NCAA still wins 2/3 of lawsuits against them.
And I am sure there is a clause in the deal for breach of contract...would love to see what it is...but Washington denying him entry in the portal is a loser for them...
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:59 pm to Chicken
quote:
maybe, but this would be between Washington and Demond, no?
I would think so. I was just saying that because I feel like the “player wins every lawsuit” narrative is a little overblown.
quote:
And I am sure there is a clause in the deal for breach of contract...would love to see what it is...but Washington denying him entry in the portal is a loser for them...
Agreed. I think that’s just their initial tactic because they were blindsided and have to put up some sort of defense. I think think that’s they will actually try to keep him.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:08 pm to LSBoosie
Question for ya’ll after reading ya’ll’s conversation; I know they can’t make him play, but could there be something enforceable in a contract that prevents him from playing for another school? legally…like a non-compete..
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:12 pm to Tiger987
I have no clue, but just gut feeling I think that would be extremely difficult for them to do.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:38 am to docTQ4
quote:
like Demond Williams is an “employee” of the university
They can sue him if they gave him money to play and he leaves. I’m sure there’s a contract. It’s not the same at all.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 4:38 am to Choupique19
quote:The State of Mississippi would explode and melt would forever be remembered in the history books. Defcon -50.
Just wait until Kewan Lacey rips up his contract and jumps to LSU as well
Please let this happen. Got my popcorn ready
Posted on 1/7/26 at 4:56 am to misey94
Pretty sure Ole Miss had to pay Walter Nolen's NIL buyout when he transferred there. That was a binding NIL deal. No clue how revenue sharing works but can't be that much different. Just pay his buyout.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:03 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
It’s time to enforce contracts in this sport.
There is no legally binding contracts, that’s the issue. Until they start giving out 4 year scholarships that can’t be pulled and every player is basically on a year to year basis, this is the chaos you will get.
Teams would have to start giving out 4 year guaranteed scholarships, and narrow the portal window down to being open 2 days in February. Only way this would somewhat temper down without congress getting involved, or a full players union and CBA.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 6:09 am
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:14 am to bwallcubfan
Why would he not have visited LSU or been linked to LSU prior to accepting the deal he signed with Washington? You would think the interest would have been mutual the whole time given he had been previously linked to Kiffin
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:18 am to BigBinBR
quote:
True. But I bet every school secretly wants them to go through with the lawsuit and win.
There are 136 FBS football teams according to Google AI. I bet 135 of them are champing at the bit to be the 2nd school to file these suits, but not a single one wants to be the 1st
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:19 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Who said anything about that? Prevent him from playing CFB ever again. It’s time to enforce contracts in this sport.
The courts have sided with players in every case when it comes to freedom of movement. This won’t be any different.
It’s going to either take congressional action or the P4 splitting off to make players actual employees with contracts and keep something like this from happening again.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:55 am to bwallcubfan
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:12 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Prevent him from playing CFB ever again.
For busting an NIL deal before the season starts?
In what world is that a reasonable, equitable remedy?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:14 am to Soggymoss
Also a long bit of thanking first God then parents then coaches etc
Then the obligatory
“With that being said…”
Then the obligatory
“With that being said…”
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News