- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Landon Clark update: visit continues to go well
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:30 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:30 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
a 5 star in the hands of Brian kelly is about equal to a 3 star in lanes hands IMO.
maybe... we about to find out though, i suppose
1
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:31 pm to chRxis
When is that last time our coaches called a play that led to broken coverage?
Lane does that on the regular.
Lane does that on the regular.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:39 pm to chRxis
If he's good enough for Mich, he's good enough for me
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:40 pm to R0ugar0u
quote:
Clark is legit. Good size, huge arm, can run, seems super athletic. I agree on rolling with him at the 1.
Can’t be worse than what we lived through last year
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:42 pm to SOL2
quote:
If he's good enough for Mich, he's good enough for me
exactly... strictly as a backup, just like Michigan is apparently proposing....
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:48 pm to chRxis
quote:
do we REALLY needs to still be taking WRs right now? 7 WRs, when you haven't even got a QB to throw to them at the moment, seems like a bit of overkill, IMO...
With the new roster rules, why not? I highly doubt the guys from McNeese and West FL are getting a dime of rev share money. They are basically walk-ons with a little NIL sponsor deal money.
Leavitt is likely not worth what he’s asking due to the health concerns and how that could limit us elsewhere. The big problem is that many of other viable options were taken off the table with their teams paying to retain them, such as Bailey and Sellers.
I wish Lane had gone ahead and made an offer to Simmons as insurance since he knows that offense inside and out. There are just very few mid-market options in this portal.
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 1/10/26 at 4:58 pm to chRxis
quote:
exactly... strictly as a backup, just like Michigan is apparently proposing....
Most top P4 programs have had backup QBs who were 3 or 4 stars in the past. Either they were waiting their turn or just didn’t work out. These programs are basically rating Clark on that level here, even though he obviously didn’t have that rating coming out of HS.
Backup or not, most programs know they will have to play their backup in a conference game at some point, even if just for a few snaps. Clark obviously doesn’t suck based on the P4 programs signing up for that.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 5:07 pm to misey94
quote:
These programs are basically rating Clark on that level here
personally, at least to me, portal rankings hold a little more weight than HS ratings do, b/c we have some sort of track record of the player vs. college competition, unlike HS players... as much as i dislike the free for all that the portal has become, i actually like more players on our roster from the portal vs. marginal HS guys clogging up the roster...
that being said, i don't fully agree with your statement, though it's sorta semantics, as far as your take and mine... if that works for you, cool, but i just value the portal differently, i suppose, thus the incongruence between us...
quote:
most programs know they will have to play their backup in a conference game at some point, even if just for a few snaps
that's COMPLETELY different than what some are supposing, which is to just roll with him at QB1 from the jump, now isn't it?
it was THAT take that i objected to, originally... and yes, i know it wasn't you that said it...
quote:
Clark obviously doesn’t suck
nor is anyone, including me, saying that... i actually want us to get him... just not as QB1
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:12 pm to chRxis
quote:
it's just amazing to me that the emergence of Chambliss has seemingly made everyone think that Kiffin has routinely taken chicken shite and made chicken salad... he is very much the oddity from Kiffin's career... almost every single QB Kiffin has had to work with was very highly recruited guys... he didn't "make" them...
Why so negative brah? He’s been good with identifying suitable guys. Dart, Chambliss were solid finds.
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:28 pm to idlewatcher
Koon said at 3:00 pm today he talked to him and visit is going great and will update again
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:32 pm to burke985
Don’t show shite about Elon but he plays aggressively
Posted on 1/10/26 at 6:42 pm to chRxis
quote:
actually want us to get him... just not as QB1
I want us to get him and HOPE he kills it enough to be QB1
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:27 pm to burke985
LSU vs. Michigan
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:30 pm to brettamedee
quote:
LSU vs. Michigan
Have you heard that LSU wants him enough to outbid Michigan?
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:40 pm to tigermed2
I've heard Michigan was involved by why on earth would he wanna go backup Bryce.in the big 10 for 2Y?
This post was edited on 1/10/26 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:42 pm to tigermed2
No, but Michigan is our challenge right now!
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:45 pm to brettamedee
Yeah I don't get the Michigan thing unless it was like his favorite team growing up or something like that
Posted on 1/10/26 at 7:51 pm to burke985
quote:
Yeah I don't get the Michigan thing unless it was like his favorite team growing up or something like that
Yeah that’s where I am. He’s gonna be underwood’s back up or have a chance to compete for qb1 here pending any moves Kiffin makes tomorrow
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News