- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:10 pm to iPad
This is going to get good when one of these players waits till the NCAA deadline passes and files suit against the university for damages.
They’ll win, because schools have to abide by the 48 hour deadline, and the kid may be able to prove damages because of the portal offers to other players at their position.
Couple that with Ole Miss abiding by every other request to jump into the portal and they’re toast. Even with the new agreement, it has a stipulation for the buyout. That means the kid can get out of the agreement and Ole Miss is just violating their own agreement.
Attorney may sue and ask for punitive damages.
They’ll win, because schools have to abide by the 48 hour deadline, and the kid may be able to prove damages because of the portal offers to other players at their position.
Couple that with Ole Miss abiding by every other request to jump into the portal and they’re toast. Even with the new agreement, it has a stipulation for the buyout. That means the kid can get out of the agreement and Ole Miss is just violating their own agreement.
Attorney may sue and ask for punitive damages.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:11 pm to iPad
I feel like lane is going to hang 60 on OM next year
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:51 pm to LafTiger
quote:
Attorney may sue and ask for punitive damages.
And win
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:59 pm to supersaints9
This is a fricking mess.
The NCAA is 75% to blame
It would be 40%, but the NCAA has verified that they dont know how to properly enforce ANYTHING that they set precedents for...and just about any student athlete that knows how to dial a phone number to a lawyer can beat any schmuck the NCAA throws at them
They created a fricking problem. I cant blame anyone for exposing it. Hopefully in the long run, this shite gets fixed, because even though it feels like we're finally winning again, this is not amateur football
And if thats the new NCAA, then frick it. Let's call it that, then move towards a new Era
The NCAA is 75% to blame
It would be 40%, but the NCAA has verified that they dont know how to properly enforce ANYTHING that they set precedents for...and just about any student athlete that knows how to dial a phone number to a lawyer can beat any schmuck the NCAA throws at them
They created a fricking problem. I cant blame anyone for exposing it. Hopefully in the long run, this shite gets fixed, because even though it feels like we're finally winning again, this is not amateur football
And if thats the new NCAA, then frick it. Let's call it that, then move towards a new Era
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:28 pm to doya2
quote:
$600,000 is just the starting point. -$300,000 to Ole Miss -$300,000 from LSU NIL pool next year Then the salary for the player….
You’re double-counting the buyout. If they were to sign him for $1.7M and pay a $300K buyout, that just means they are spending $2M total and all $2M counts toward the revenue sharing cap, even though the player is only getting $1.7M directly. It’s not $2.3M.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:32 pm to LafTiger
quote:
This is going to get good when one of these players waits till the NCAA deadline passes and files suit against the university for damages. They’ll win, because schools have to abide by the 48 hour deadline, and the kid may be able to prove damages because of the portal offers to other players at their position. Couple that with Ole Miss abiding by every other request to jump into the portal and they’re toast. Even with the new agreement, it has a stipulation for the buyout. That means the kid can get out of the agreement and Ole Miss is just violating their own agreement. Attorney may sue and ask for punitive damages.
This new era of college football is so much better than how it used to be
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:40 pm to iPad
quote:
Fluid situation.
Fluid is a good way to describe “the other side”.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:43 pm to MikeTheTiger71
quote:
You’re double-counting the buyout.
According to the house settlement case you pay the buyout and also take a cap hit the next year
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:43 pm to iPad
Pete Nakos is a MORON! I'm pretty sick of the guy giving out FALSE info. His sources have their heads up their asses. Princewell is IN the portal right now. According to 247Sports he was in the portal YESTERDAY. God, I wish this Nakos guy would just STFU!G
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:49 pm to Honkus
quote:
According to the house settlement case you pay the buyout and also take a cap hit the next year
That just means the money paid for the buyout counts toward the cap. It doesn’t get counted twice. If you pay the player $1.7M and $300K for the buyout, you don’t get to only count the $1.7M toward the cap. You have to count the full $2M. Effectively, they are saying you are paying the player $2M and then he is paying the $300K buyout. It’s still only a $2M hit overall. It’s not going to cost LSU $600K.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:54 pm to doya2
People keep saying money comes out the NIL Pool but not one of them explain this.
There is no NIL Pool!!! NIL is unlimited with no Cap!
Do they Mean the Revenue sharing Pool???? if so and 300k comes out of that WHO GIVES A frick MAKE IT UP ON THE NO CAP NIL SIDE!!
There is no NIL Pool!!! NIL is unlimited with no Cap!
Do they Mean the Revenue sharing Pool???? if so and 300k comes out of that WHO GIVES A frick MAKE IT UP ON THE NO CAP NIL SIDE!!
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:16 pm to NotaStarGazer
I just used ai to look into this, and according to its research he is not “officially” entered into the portal.
I do not know. But I also don’t like this Nakos guy.
I do not know. But I also don’t like this Nakos guy.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:26 pm to LafTiger
quote:
I just used ai to look into this
Maybe he is maybe he isn't but AI is hilariously wrong a shocking percentage of the time.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:44 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Fair, I’m hoping he’s in. But it wouldn’t surprise me to see these hypocrites at OM pull this.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:46 pm to LafTiger
quote:AI is terrible at things that have happened recently… It is a terrible source for this type of stuff
just used ai to look into this
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:51 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Maybe he is maybe he isn't but AI is hilariously wrong a shocking percentage of the time.
Yeah I find it to be much better at theoretical future ideas, creating as opposed to digging into current real world hard facts.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:05 pm to Robcrzy
quote:
People keep saying money comes out the NIL Pool but not one of them explain this.
There is no NIL Pool!!! NIL is unlimited with no Cap!
Do they Mean the Revenue sharing Pool???? if so and 300k comes out of that WHO GIVES A frick MAKE IT UP ON THE NO CAP NIL SIDE!!
The NIL side has to pass through the clearinghouse, so there is a Fair Market Value cap on it. The Rev Share funds aren't subject to the clearinghouse.
They know what they're doing though, and the deals have probably been NIL market value plus Rev Share on top of that to make the icing on the cake.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:14 pm to BigD45
still doesnt explain where the loss of 300k in this situation would be deducted?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:16 pm to TigerYac
quote:
Can someone explain how this is different than the Demond situation?
Buyout is 300k not 4 million
That would be pretty different in my opinion
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 11:18 pm
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News