Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Umanmielen Second Update | “All Options On Table” | Page 3 | LSU Recruiting
Started By
Message

re: Umanmielen Second Update | “All Options On Table”

Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by Robcrzy
Mandeville
Member since Nov 2007
1265 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:27 pm to
Did we venmo the 300K yet?
Posted by BigD45
The Boot!
Member since Feb 2007
2203 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:03 am to
quote:

still doesnt explain where the loss of 300k in this situation would be deducted?


We don't know what Ole Miss was paying him, but it's obvious they're low-balling some of the current players. If his fair market value is high enough, our deal could exceed theirs and pay off the buyout at the same time if he agrees to that. If he wants more money that exceeds his fair market value, it would have to be paid out of Rev Share.

It could go either way.

One other thing is schools can agree to pay a buyout via installment payments which could spread out the obligation over, let's say, the next 2 years. Knowing Ole Miss, they will want it all up front.

Posted by GaryHobson
Member since Jan 2026
30 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:09 am to
quote:

This new era of college football is so much better than how it used to be



and 2020-2024 was the best era in our lifetimes.
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6733 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:13 am to
I don't agree. This is free agency, but the players become free agents every off season, and have to be re-signed. That's a horrible model.

I'm pulling for us to get all the best players in this wacky market, because everyone is in the same boat, and it's what you have to do to compete. But this isn't sustainable. At the VERY least, it needs to go back to the one free transfer rule. If you want to be a TJ Finley and play for seven different schools, you'll be in your 30's, and still in college. But with this unlimited free transfer era, and the NIL driving up the market every year, it's killing the sport.
Posted by GaryHobson
Member since Jan 2026
30 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:14 am to
quote:

Metaloctopus



don't argue with him. That was just rage bait
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6733 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:16 am to
quote:

don't argue with him. That was just rage bait


Well I'm not enraged, I just don't agree. And if he's only looking for a reaction, I have no way of knowing if that's what he's doing. There are plenty of fans that think every new thing is great for college football.
Posted by GaryHobson
Member since Jan 2026
30 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:20 am to
quote:

Well I'm not enraged, I just don't agree. And if he's only looking for a reaction, I have no way of knowing if that's what he's doing. There are plenty of fans that think every new thing is great for college football.



the only people who think this version of college football is better was born after 2005. It's like saying Covid was the best time in our lifetime. Makes zero sense

This has nothing to do with the sport we grew up watching.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 2:22 am
Posted by Metaloctopus
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2018
6733 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:24 am to
quote:

the only people who think this version of college football is better was born after 2005. It's like saying Covid was the best time in our lifetime. Makes zero sense


Yeah, it clearly makes no sense. And yet, like I said, there are plenty who think it's great. We're in a world where lots of things people say or believe don't make sense. So when someone says something outrageous, I can no longer assume it's satirical or sarcastic, unless it's written in a way that makes it obvious.
Posted by GaryHobson
Member since Jan 2026
30 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:42 am to
quote:

Yeah, it clearly makes no sense. And yet, like I said, there are plenty who think it's great. We're in a world where lots of things people say or believe don't make sense. So when someone says something outrageous, I can no longer assume it's satirical or sarcastic, unless it's written in a way that makes it obvious.



touche
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
24111 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:14 am to
quote:

I don't agree. This is free agency, but the players become free agents every off season, and have to be re-signed. That's a horrible model. I'm pulling for us to get all the best players in this wacky market, because everyone is in the same boat, and it's what you have to do to compete. But this isn't sustainable. At the VERY least, it needs to go back to the one free transfer rule. If you want to be a TJ Finley and play for seven different schools, you'll be in your 30's, and still in college. But with this unlimited free transfer era, and the NIL driving up the market every year, it's killing the sport.


One contract every year means players play hard every year because they have to keep their stock up if they want to renew or get a raise in the portal. Opposed to NFL where they get a 5+ year contract and sit on their arse until the last year when they start playing hard. Or opposed to before when we didn’t have any contracts and good players like Chase would just sit out ride bench all year.

Saying it isn’t sustainable just makes you sound like a retard.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40472 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Saying it isn’t sustainable just makes you sound like a retard.


I think there’s some sort of competition to see who can say “this is unsustainable” the most.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram