- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If we don’t get Will Wade
Posted on 1/13/26 at 8:54 pm to SEC Doctor
Posted on 1/13/26 at 8:54 pm to SEC Doctor
I can’t hear you I can’t hear you I can’t hear you
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 8:59 pm to SmoothBox
quote:
Prioritize a sport that loses money.
These folks who are eagerly willing to sacrifice basketball for baseball amuse me.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 9:03 pm to Hiphopanonymous
If Will Wade gets mentioned anymore the OP should be Perma Banned
Posted on 1/13/26 at 9:17 pm to Robcrzy
It is entertaining how many people on this thread simply don't get it. The people that fired Wade and refused last year to rehire him are gone, and were run out of town fairly unceremoniously. The people that supported him at McNeese are now in charge. More importantly, the Governor who is very clearly influencing decisions in the athletic department would strongly support the hire. One particular BOS member that has been mentioned in this thread will strongly support an attempt to hire Wade.
None of this means that we are definitively going to hire Wade, but you would be an idiot if you don't think the people that supported him a year ago will not aggressively go after him once McMahon is out (it is no longer if, but when, as the wheels to that decision are already in motion). He may tell us no, but the job will be his should he want it. More importantly, the commitment from the administration, both in his pay and player pay will be significant. The offer to him will definitely be more than he is making at NCST. Of course, that doesn't mean it wouldn't be matched in Raliegh. A lot of moving parts between now and April 2, 2026.
None of this means that we are definitively going to hire Wade, but you would be an idiot if you don't think the people that supported him a year ago will not aggressively go after him once McMahon is out (it is no longer if, but when, as the wheels to that decision are already in motion). He may tell us no, but the job will be his should he want it. More importantly, the commitment from the administration, both in his pay and player pay will be significant. The offer to him will definitely be more than he is making at NCST. Of course, that doesn't mean it wouldn't be matched in Raliegh. A lot of moving parts between now and April 2, 2026.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:23 pm to Hiphopanonymous
So what wouldWade do any better? NC State is 12-5 and LSU is 12-4. If you want a new coach get an upgrade not a virtual lateral.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:40 pm to LSU Bayou Jim
quote:
NC State is 12-5 and LSU is 12-4. If you want a new coach get an upgrade not a virtual lateral.
You really can’t be that stupid, can you?
NCST’s 12-5 has them solidly in the tournament for most projections as an 8 to 10 seed, with a 5-4 record against Q1 and Q2 teams.
LINK
LSU on the other hand has a 12-4 record and by nearly every major projection is not in the tournament. It has 1 win over any team in Q1 and Q2, and in fact has only beaten one team with sub 100 NET.
LINK
Comparing the records of these two teams, without actually looking at who they play shows how ignorant you really are on this subject
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:40 pm to ellessuuuu
They do not watch or follow basketball
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:16 am to ellessuuuu
quote:
It is entertaining how many people on this thread simply don't get it.
Add yourself to that number. Wade will not be returning to LSU!
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:24 am to ellessuuuu
Wade ain't coming back. You can't be so galacticly stupid that you think he will. BTW getting into the tournament and getting knocked out quick is as bad as not getting in. So how many nattys has wade won? You don't have to look it up, it's the same total as McNugget....0
So if you're going to kick the current coach, get an upgrade.
So if you're going to kick the current coach, get an upgrade.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:12 am to ellessuuuu
Yes he can and is
Posted on 1/14/26 at 7:15 am to ellessuuuu
quote:
NCST’s 12-5 has them solidly in the tournament for most projections as an 8 to 10 seed, with a 5-4 record against Q1 and Q2 teams.
Yeah, WW always had that computer nerd helping him schedule smartly and effectively to help with NET. We played what? 2 top 100 NET teams OOC?
Context is important here.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:15 am to LSU Bayou Jim
quote:
BTW getting into the tournament and getting knocked out quick is as bad as not getting in.
You're an absolute moron.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:26 am to LSU Bayou Jim
Is it as bad as going 14 and MOTHERFLUCKING 43 in SEC play??????
Posted on 1/14/26 at 10:52 am to Hiphopanonymous
The infatuation with Wade should be studied.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:07 am to StadiumDormNEZ72
Hell then, I'm cool with doing away with basketball altogether and paying for a new LSU Chess program .
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:35 am to Kool Kaliper
You misspelled winning.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:52 am to MrWalkingMan
Men’s Basketball can be self sustaining. Being good at basketball wouldn’t take away from football or baseball. Now girls basketball is the one that takes money from other sports if you want to prioritize.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News