- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spec Play - HGRAF
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:23 pm to igoringa
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:23 pm to igoringa
quote:
am a little100K ish share count
I am half that, but if it drops to the low 1's again, I will up the count.
You buy some here, sell some there, buy it back, it climbs, Swedebabe says the DOD wants all they can produce, then first thing you know, Jed's a millionaire.
If it hits the aforementioned $600, I will not own it when it hits $1000.
1
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:14 pm to Hangit
Just wait a week or two you’ll be able to get it again at $1.10
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:22 pm to dallastiger55
Hate to be a downer, but is there any chance of a secondary offering in the near future? When was the last one?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:38 pm to TDFreak
quote:
is there any chance of a secondary offering in the near future?
Swedebabe said they don't need to. She said they are sitting on almost a year's burn and turn down offers to lend money 2-3 times per day.
She said aboot 3 -4 times that there will be no dilution.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 10:27 pm to Hangit
If this hits $100 I am out and no one in my family ever has to work again.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 12:47 am to TDFreak
quote:
Hate to be a downer, but is there any chance of a secondary offering in the near future? When was the last one?
No, what is more likely is a reverse split so that the stock price will double but share holders will lose half their shares.
Apparently everyone was not paying attention in the last interview.
In previous interviews she said she was confident we would reach $4 by February.
Now she says “it is possible we reach $4 organically but…..”
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 12:50 am
Posted on 9/24/25 at 5:55 am to Guntoter1
How ready do you have to be for news
Like that?
Do you sell the second they talk about a reverse split Since you have half the shares?
Then wait for the price to drop back down and buy double?
How quick do you have to do that based on the news?
Like that?
Do you sell the second they talk about a reverse split Since you have half the shares?
Then wait for the price to drop back down and buy double?
How quick do you have to do that based on the news?
Posted on 9/24/25 at 6:00 am to dstone12
quote:
Do you sell the second they talk about a reverse split Since you have half the shares?
The share price theoretically doubles so you don't need to do anything.
If a company is worth $10 with 10 shares every share is $1
If a company is worth $10 with 5 shares, every share is $2.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 6:24 am to GenesChin
quote:
The share price theoretically doubles so you don't need to do anything. If a company is worth $10 with 10 shares every share is $1 If a company is worth $10 with 5 shares, every share is $2
But the speculative nature would suggest that a slew of people that see their shares get cut in half while doubling the value will want to sell while they still have half the shares anticipating other speculators to sell off to make a quick profit.
Then if the price goes down with the sell off they buy back.
That was my thought.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 6:27 am to Guntoter1
quote:
No, what is more likely is a reverse split so that the stock price will double but share holders will lose half their shares.
Apparently everyone was not paying attention in the last interview.
In previous interviews she said she was confident we would reach $4 by February.
Now she says “it is possible we reach $4 organically but…..”
Yes was definitely a partial walkback there in terms of something that technically I am not sure she could have fully asserted to begin with (rules are dicey on price predictions of management).
That being said - atleast we have a big pullback from here - if the news purported to occur by Q1 comes out, I do not think it will be much of a challenge to the $4. But that is banking on government news, other revenue contracts (although small to start), houston plant etc...
Posted on 9/24/25 at 6:31 am to dstone12
quote:
But the speculative nature would suggest that a slew of people that see their shares get cut in half while doubling the value will want to sell while they still have half the shares anticipating other speculators to sell off to make a quick profit.
Then if the price goes down with the sell off they buy back.
That was my thought.
Yes traditionally you are correct (as is the OP) in that although there is ZERO economic difference with a reverse stock split, the share action tends to be negative for psychological reasons (and bluntly 95% of Reverse splits are because a company is in trouble and is not meeting existing listing requirements).
In this case, I can see the exception because the split is solely to achieve listing and with that comes a massive amount of new liquidity. Like a ridiculous amount compared to current. I know I am not the speculative guy on the street but if you gave me the option of: (1) 2 shares at $2 trading OTC or (2) 1 share at $4 trading NASDAQ - to me that is an easy decision to go with $4. But your point holds on speculative impact
Posted on 9/24/25 at 6:33 am to igoringa
Do we believe this company will eventually be profitable? We don’t know if they secure contracts but it seems likely? It’s still an OTC stock and wondering when it gets on NASDAQ if they has a big impact.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:41 am to AUtigerNOLA
To reiterate what Ignoring said, being on the NASDAQ should be huge. Even in the past few days we've had people on this board trying figure out how to buy this stock. Being an OTC stock is holding it back. Not a lot, because they still don't have customers or a production facility, but as those things come on line, it should make a huge difference in price and coverage from analysts (which is basically nil, but for Kevin Bambrough).
On paper, this one seems to be an easy one to get to profitability, due to the scale of the combustion chambers. If they need to produce more, they build more devices, so they can spend capital as needed. They don't have to build a massive factory just to get started, so they won't be buried in debt over sunk costs.
I don't remember the numbers, but I seem to remember that they will sell the graphene for $250K per metric ton on the low end, and the cost of building one of the combustion chambers is about the same cost as on metric ton of base graphene. It seems that they could be profitable faster than most companies.
On paper, this one seems to be an easy one to get to profitability, due to the scale of the combustion chambers. If they need to produce more, they build more devices, so they can spend capital as needed. They don't have to build a massive factory just to get started, so they won't be buried in debt over sunk costs.
I don't remember the numbers, but I seem to remember that they will sell the graphene for $250K per metric ton on the low end, and the cost of building one of the combustion chambers is about the same cost as on metric ton of base graphene. It seems that they could be profitable faster than most companies.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:46 am to Jax-Tiger
I should’ve bought more tbh
This feels like sli all over again
This feels like sli all over again
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:50 am to Jax-Tiger
Press release that HydroGraph is entering into an agreement with SeaDar, a company that is a part of the DoD DIU. Initial collaboration is to use their Graphene in anti-corrosion coatings on SeaDar’s sensors and high tensile cables to asses the performance for other DoD applications. This is the purpose of the DIU…to fast track new technologies through military trials!
HydroGraph signs letter of intent with SeaDar
HydroGraph signs letter of intent with SeaDar
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 8:07 am
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:04 am to MekaWarriors
I dont know how you all can still think this is legit. Ive seen many penny stocks PR signing letter of intents (LOI) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) but they never come to fruition. There is no reason to PR these things because they are worthless, unless youre trying to pump the stock.
This is a scam. And SEADAR doesnt appear to be a legitimate company just like Hawkeye Bio. Why do we only see press releases with no name companies that dont actually have customers or products? Because its a scam.
This is a scam. And SEADAR doesnt appear to be a legitimate company just like Hawkeye Bio. Why do we only see press releases with no name companies that dont actually have customers or products? Because its a scam.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:28 am to Good Ole Baw
quote:
they never come to fruition
They never come to fruition?
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:36 am to Good Ole Baw
quote:
I dont know how you all can still think this is legit. Ive seen many penny stocks PR signing letter of intents (LOI) or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) but they never come to fruition. There is no reason to PR these things because they are worthless, unless youre trying to pump the stock.
This is a scam. And SEADAR doesnt appear to be a legitimate company just like Hawkeye Bio. Why do we only see press releases with no name companies that dont actually have customers or products? Because its a scam.
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I'm not treating this as a long hold. Yet.
In the meantime I will continue milking it for very nice profits
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 8:54 am
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:38 am to MekaWarriors
Awesome news. Having the military involved could possibly be the catalyst to speed things up...
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:39 am to Jax-Tiger
Over $2 again.
Page 73 of 120
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News