- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NBA Playoff First Round Predictions
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:26 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:26 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Ah so that's why scheduling was funky this weekend. SA usually gets the shite time slot for the first game 
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 1:27 pm
1
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:40 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I just scrolled through like 5 pages of Harden/Rockets arguments and no first round predictions.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:42 pm to Smoke7024
Well tell us how you feel about JH13...
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:46 pm to Smoke7024
MSB gonna MSB
Posted on 4/15/16 at 1:48 pm to Smoke7024
I'll give my predictions:
Cle over Detroit in 5
Raptors over Pacers in 5
Heat over Hornets in 7
Celtics over Hawks in 7
Warriors over Rockets in 4.
Spurs over griz in 4.
Thunder over Mavs in 6.
Blazers over clips in 7.
Cle over Detroit in 5
Raptors over Pacers in 5
Heat over Hornets in 7
Celtics over Hawks in 7
Warriors over Rockets in 4.
Spurs over griz in 4.
Thunder over Mavs in 6.
Blazers over clips in 7.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:08 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
I feel like there's 2 mildy interesting 1st round series, i'll check in in round 2.
TOR in 6
GSW in 4
BOS in 6
OKC in 5
CLE in 4
MIA in 7
SAS in 4
LAC in 6
TOR in 6
GSW in 4
BOS in 6
OKC in 5
CLE in 4
MIA in 7
SAS in 4
LAC in 6
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:13 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
My thoughts
Cle > Det in 6
Tor > Ind in 6
Cha > Mia in 7
Bos > Atl in 5
GSW > Hou in 5
SAS > Mem in 4
OKC > Dal in 5
LAC > Por in 6
Cle > Det in 6
Tor > Ind in 6
Cha > Mia in 7
Bos > Atl in 5
GSW > Hou in 5
SAS > Mem in 4
OKC > Dal in 5
LAC > Por in 6
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:14 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
quote:
Blazers over clips in 7.
That's gonna be a fun series.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:24 pm to htran90
JJ's beat the Griz in 5
OKC beats the Mavs in 6
Portland in 7
Warriors sweep
Spurs in 6 over OKC
Warriors in 5 over LAC
WCF I have no idea and do not want to think about it.
OKC beats the Mavs in 6
Portland in 7
Warriors sweep
Spurs in 6 over OKC
Warriors in 5 over LAC
WCF I have no idea and do not want to think about it.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:25 pm to sms151t
quote:They were 13-4 when Jordan came back. That's the pace of a 63 win season. There weren't chemistry issues like you are alluding to. That's revisionist history. And Jordan had better numbers in the playoffs in '95 than he did in '96.
But the Bulls were not the same Bulls as they did not have Jordan the whole year and he came back after ASB, so new rotation and new chemistry had to be done. Not saying the Bulls win but they may have not played the Magic in the Finals.
People seem to forget that they didn't have Dennis Rodman in 1995. He was to the Bulls what Draymond Green is to the Warriors.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:27 pm to PrimeTime Money
That is why I said that they were not the Bulls.
The key to all the Bulls was the ability to rebound. They had Grant, King, Levingston in the first run.
In the second run they had Rodman, Longley, and Harper (6'6" PG)
Actually the revisionist is you trying to insinuate that Jordan was full go.
The key to all the Bulls was the ability to rebound. They had Grant, King, Levingston in the first run.
In the second run they had Rodman, Longley, and Harper (6'6" PG)
Actually the revisionist is you trying to insinuate that Jordan was full go.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:30 pm to sms151t
quote:I know and I'm saying people assume that they were the same Bulls and they would have gotten to the Finals in 1994 and 1995. I'm saying no, they were not the same Bulls and Jordan did play in 1995 and they did very well when he came back. The reason they didn't beat the Magic wasn't because Jordan wasn't playing well due to coming back later in the season and chemistry issues. They weren't as good in 1995 because it was before they got Dennis Rodman and the Magic were really good.
That is why I said that they were not the Bulls. The key to all the Bulls was the ability to rebound. They had Grant, King, Levingston in the first run. In the second run they had Rodman, Longley, and Harper (6'6" PG)
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:32 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Blazers over clips in 7.
quote:That most of us won't stay up to watch
That's gonna be a fun series.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:33 pm to Boomshockalocka
Good basketball player, but looks like a homeless guy with a faux hawk.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:50 pm to Smoke7024
Congrats to the homeless guy, just named Western Conference player of the Month..Here's his averages:
35pts
7assists
3reb
2stls
51.7 from 3
Pretty clear James has been saving a lil something all year in his back pocket and is now playing his best ball heading into the post season. But don't you dare mention it here because there's just no way he could've been half, 3 quarter assing it earlier in the season and pacing himself so that he can be at his best heading into the playoffs, no of course he wouldn't do that.
35pts
7assists
3reb
2stls
51.7 from 3
Pretty clear James has been saving a lil something all year in his back pocket and is now playing his best ball heading into the post season. But don't you dare mention it here because there's just no way he could've been half, 3 quarter assing it earlier in the season and pacing himself so that he can be at his best heading into the playoffs, no of course he wouldn't do that.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 4/15/16 at 2:59 pm to Boomshockalocka
So what does it tell you about him if he only tries some of the time? Doesn't sound like a player I would want.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 3:00 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Yea you'd like someone that brings it every time but I'll take James best over just about anybody elses. And when the games really matter you'll see him at his best. Sorry, I don't give a shite about a game v Brooklyn on a Tuesday night in November, so I can't be mad it James DGAF either. I want him playing his best in the postseason.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 3:05 pm to Boomshockalocka
So you acknowledge that the rockets are actually much better than how they have played. You're not mad that the star and supposed leader of the team didn't play hard while making millions and in turn, they barely snuck into the playoffs and have to play one of the best teams in history?
Posted on 4/15/16 at 3:13 pm to Boomshockalocka
Those are good numbers, but I really don't care to be honest.
Posted on 4/15/16 at 3:15 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
but I'll take James best over just about anybody elses.
Anyone huh?
Page 18 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News