- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Star Wars Phantom Menace Destroyed
Posted on 12/18/09 at 7:21 pm to Cruiserhog
Posted on 12/18/09 at 7:21 pm to Cruiserhog
"so genius" was the term.
And yes, you can see what they mean by that when you see the solo Lucas product.
And yes, you can see what they mean by that when you see the solo Lucas product.
Posted on 12/18/09 at 9:31 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
this shot was so awesome Im convinced George Lucas had nothing to do with it.....
yeah that was the part I was referring to that made me bust out laughing at work
Posted on 12/19/09 at 12:43 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 12/21/09 at 10:13 am to Bourque2
quote:
wow...not sure who did this..but well done sir...well done
I don' think the same guy that posted the review on the website... who is the creator of that site I believe (Peter Scriatta?)... is the same guy that did the review. I think he states its like "some guy named Mike from Milwaukee" or something like that?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 10:15 am to coloradoBengal
ok i'm gonna have to watch this when i get home today
Posted on 12/21/09 at 11:57 am to OMLandshark
Good God this guys voice is insufferable.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 12:14 pm to someoldhussy
quote:wow
Good God this guys voice is insufferable.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 1:17 pm to someoldhussy
quote:
Good God this guys voice is insufferable.
Keep on going through the review. You begin to appreciate his voice as the review goes on.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 2:09 pm to OMLandshark
*drunken slur*
What's wrong with your faaaacce?
What's wrong with your faaaacce?
Posted on 12/21/09 at 2:43 pm to OMLandshark
Did you see on the multishot during the layout of the typical film when he says the protagonist gets the girl, the last one was Charlie hugging Wonka? 
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:27 pm to Volvagia
Yes and I laughed my arse off.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 6:51 pm to OMLandshark
If you watch his reviews of the Star Trek movies then the pizza rolls and wife stuff make more sense.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 8:41 pm to OMLandshark
Wow,
That was awesome.
Kind of makes up for the time/money wasted seeing those movies
That was awesome.
Kind of makes up for the time/money wasted seeing those movies
Posted on 12/21/09 at 9:32 pm to H-Town Tiger
Wow. Probably the best review I've ever seen of any movie, much less one that really deserved a critical eye.
I actually learned stuff about storytelling and simplicity of character and plot from his review.
What a find!
I actually learned stuff about storytelling and simplicity of character and plot from his review.
What a find!
Posted on 12/21/09 at 9:42 pm to SpqrTiger
You also learn not to listen to talking pizza rolls
Posted on 12/21/09 at 9:54 pm to someoldhussy
quote:
Good God this guys voice is insufferable.
This guys will become a cult icon, book it...I actually find myself doing his voice in quotes from his review...cracks me up everytime.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 11:47 pm to SpqrTiger
quote:
Wow. Probably the best review I've ever seen of any movie, much less one that really deserved a critical eye.
I actually learned stuff about storytelling and simplicity of character and plot from his review.
What a find!
This is why I liked it. He not just the movie sucked he showed why and how it was better in the old movies. From a movie making, actor, and structure perspective. He did some stuff that I never thought of before, like how everything was shot in front of green screens so the actors never were part of their environment so they never acted with it, also how the light saber duels were so choreographed they lacked the soul and emotion of the duels from the first movies. His review was funny and still had a lot of depth.
Posted on 12/22/09 at 12:41 am to ornagestorm
I'd say really the best part of this review is that he didn't choose to focus on the obvious flaws: aka Jar Jar Binks. He could have had another 2 parts if he wanted to dissing Jar Jar, but he mentions him once and not too much again. He didn't have to go for cheap laughs and stuff pretty much everyone knew, which makes this a much better review as a result.
Posted on 12/22/09 at 12:48 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
This guys will become a cult icon, book it
How much?
Popular
Back to top


0





