Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Daniel Jeremiah Mock Draft 1.0 | Page 4 | Saints Talk
Started By
Message

re: Daniel Jeremiah Mock Draft 1.0

Posted on 1/26/26 at 11:59 pm to
Posted by death valley driver
CHOPPA CITY
Member since Jul 2004
11685 posts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 11:59 pm to
Talking about spending FA money on Allegeir when you have a chance to draft Bijan Robinson lmaoooooookk. Who do you think keeps coordinators UP at night?


Good receivers have become a dime a dozen. Run game and good defense are a QBs best friend. Better shore that UP before you think about overdrafting your fav receiver, especially at 8 in this draft



DRIVEMAN OUT
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1196 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 5:33 am to
In the last 10 drafts, these are the RBs who were taken in the top 15 picks:

Jeanty (6)
Gibbs (12)
Bijan (8)
Saquon (2)
Fournette (4)
McCaffrey (8)
Elliott (4)

That is an extremely high hit rate with only Fournette and Jeanty not being All Pro level players and Jeanty will likely significantly improve if in a better situation. This generation of running backs are also weapons in the passing game, which increases their value to an offense above the conventional role of the RB. The big knock on RB is durability, but this should not be a concern on the rookie deal
Posted by Cgal
Member since Feb 2025
211 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 6:57 am to
quote:

8. New Orleans Saints - Jeremiyah Love RB


I actually like this pick, Shough showed he can be competitive without a star RB, imagine Love giving him options.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:28 am to
quote:

That is an extremely high hit rate


3 of those guys had team success away from their drafting team, though.

Jeanty will probably be #4 in time.

Sounds like we have almost as good of a shot trying to follow that path while keeping the draft capital for a more valuable position

And the fact that you go back 10 years and two of them are already done isn't a good sign.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14793 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Talking about spending FA money on Allegeir when you have a chance to draft Bijan Robinson lmaoooooookk. Who do you think keeps coordinators UP at night?


And yet Bijan hasn’t sniffed the playoffs…
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:25 am to
I don't think I'm the only one waiting for physical testing to compare Love to a Bijan/Gibbs athlete.

I'm not saying he's going to be a Jeanty, but Bijan and Gibbs are special and Love's tape doesn't scream that level of athleticism.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74363 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:29 am to
I’m not even a take a RB Stan but it’s such dumb reasoning. Barkely, CMC, Bijan all lead the league in scrimmage yards within their rookie deals. Zeke had two rushing titles. LF was a beast when healthy. Bad organizations are usually just bad. If you think your team is on the up, you have a good offensive minded coach, a QB on a rookie deal, some cap space etc it allows you to take the swing if you so chose

If we only draft positions that had a high hit rate of “team success” we wouldn’t drafting anyone?

Do we like WRs/TEs drafted in the top 10? You can go through all the positions who didn’t have “team success”. The “most valuable” position is the one that doesn’t flop

Darrius Heyward Bey
Michael Crabtree
AJ Green
Julio Jones
Justin Blackmon
Tavon Austin
Eric Ebron
Sammy Watkins
Amari cooper
Kevin white
Corey Davis
Mike Williams
John Ross
TJ Hockenson
Jamar Chase
Jaylen Waddle
Kyle Pitts
Drake London
Garrett Wilson
Marvin Harrison
Malik Nabors
Rome Odunze

This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 8:33 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Bad organizations are usually just bad. If you think your team is on the up,


All organizations think they're on the up, though, including bad ones, which is why they over-draft RBs.

quote:

you have a good QB on a rookie deal, some cap space etc it allows you to take the swing if you so chose

I'd rather take a swing on someone who projects elite value and use the cap space to get a proven RB on a cheaper, short-term deal.

This year has SEVERAL solid options at RB in FA. What would a Rachaad White cost us? JK Dobbins?

Those names are sexy, but they're solid, dependable options who would be cheap
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74363 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

I don't think I'm the only one waiting for physical testing to compare Love to a Bijan/Gibbs athlete.


Love was Missouri 5A 100m state champion, 40” vert at camps. At 6’ 215. He will be a freak, Buckle up.

Gibbs and Jeanty are shrimp compared to Love, not really great comps regardless





Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76107 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:48 am to
Sexy is Breece and Walker.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52267 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Bain, Downs, and Tate to pick Love. He doesn't have Carnell Tate going until 16, which is the lowest I've seen him projected.
i would take all before Love.

Just take Love's teammate Jadarian Price later
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36065 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I'd rather take a swing on someone who projects elite value and use the cap space to get a proven RB on a cheaper, short-term deal.


That’s where the rub is. Is Love a stud RB that brings elite RB value (Bijan, Gibbs, etc.)? Or do you believe no RB has elite value? And who else is available that is a better value at the time and how do you judge them (I think Downs is better. I don’t think Bain or Tyson are all that good.)?

It depends on a lot of factors.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Gibbs and Jeanty are shrimp compared to Love


Jeanty was only referenced b/c he skipped testing b/c he wouldn't test well, and I said Love wasn't in that concern boat.

Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52267 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:55 am to
Just did a mock and i got Bain at 8, Chris Bell WR at 42 and Jadarian Price at 73 gimme dat all day.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Is Love a stud RB that brings elite RB value (Bijan, Gibbs, etc.)? Or do you believe no RB has elite value?


Bijan and Gibbs are somewhat interesting for the value discussion (and I love Bijan). The Falcons haven't done shite with Bijan over 3 years of his rookie deal, and this was Gibbs' year as the focal point of the DET offense and they didn't make the playoffs.

The problem with the value of RBs is that hitting max team value/impact is very dependent on the team around them (Gibbs this year is a great example of this, along with Saquon)

quote:

And who else is available that is a better value at the time and how do you judge them (I think Downs is better.

It would be kind of insane, given where defenses are going, to pick Love over Downs.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74363 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:02 am to
There’s more than one way to skin a cat but the difference of having a JK Dobbins vs a Love in the backfield is immense. And we have to look past next season,

You can pay a premium for one of the FA but they already have the miles
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76107 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:04 am to
Doubt Downs is there but I have no doubt we would grab him.
Also certain Chiefs grab Love at 10. Great fit there. Patrick opens up the field for Love.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:05 am to
quote:

but the difference of having a JK Dobbins vs a Love in the backfield is immense

To team success? With a bad OL? Is it?

quote:

And we have to look past next season,

a. White or Dobbins is going to be around in 2027. If we want to get splugy, so will Hall or Etienne.

b. We can draft other RBs. There are some studs, like Jonah Coleman or guys with elite potential like Demond Claiborne that we can draft later.

quote:

You can pay a premium for one of the FA but they already have the miles

I said short-term deal. The top guys won't likely get more than 3-year deals. Lesser guys liike White/JK/Gainwell 1-2 years.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
474707 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Also certain Chiefs grab Love at 10. Great fit there. Patrick opens up the field for Love.

Yeah THAT makes sense, given where the Chiefs are as a team/roster.

I think the fanbase is projecting the Saints at a better place than where we actually are b/c we finished well with a rookie QB against a weak schedule. We can easily be on the incline, but we're not anywhere close to a really good roster right now.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
23724 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Yeah THAT makes sense, given where the Chiefs are as a team/roster.

It’s not different. Positional value doesn’t change just because a roster is in a different state. They have needs on the dline and secondary too for a top 10 pick
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram