- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baton Rouge has lost a glamorous judge
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:51 am to cgrand
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:51 am to cgrand
quote:
read the dissenting opinions before you grab your pitchfork. Her term is almost up, they favored suspension for the remainder of her term until the election wherein the voters would decide her fate. Like many I believe that district voting for judges is absurd, but the 3 justices that dissented simply came down on the side of voter agency and not an opinion on the severity of her behavior
That’s a very stupid position. That lame dissent just means they are completely fine with her being on the bench. Because she would have been reelected.
1
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:52 am to RED DAWN REDUX
quote:
Sadder than the travesty of this lying, incompetent Stolen Valor clown is the fact it was only a 4-3 vote to remove her….3 LA Supreme Court “justices”’voted to not remove her.
You can bet every dollar you have that them 3 justices were democrats.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:52 am to Bullfrog
quote:
Judges must all be replaced by AI.
AI is presently horrible with the law outside of spitting out statutes—which is still makes up out of thin air a lot of the time. 
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:54 am to Indefatigable
quote:no, they wanted her suspended
That lame dissent just means they are completely fine with her being on the bench.
quote:well, that’s what elections do, reflect the will of the electorate. Are you opposed to elections in general or just for judges?
Because she would have been reelected
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:55 am to real turf fan
So "glamorous" is an attribute that we expect in a judge?
We are in bad shape as a society.
We are in bad shape as a society.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:58 am to cgrand
quote:
they favored suspension for the remainder of her term until the election wherein the voters would decide her fate.
She probably would have been re-elected as long as she could get a couple dozen friends to show up to vote.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:58 am to cgrand
quote:
I think they’ve now determined this is an actual law of physics, I want to say there was a Nobel paper about it
hyphenated last names means they were raised by lesbians.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:59 am to Ponchy Tiger
quote:you know you can look that up right?
You can bet every dollar you have that them 3 justices were democrats.
spoiler alert: you’re now broke
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:01 am to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
You can bet every dollar you have that them 3 justices were democrats.
You would have lost every dollar you have. Justice Hughes is a Republican.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:02 am to cgrand
quote:
you know you can look that up right? spoiler alert: you’re now broke
Reminds me of a post on the last thread which guaranteed she was a Republican because the Advocate was coming down hard on her
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:03 am to tonydtigr
quote:
There have been instances where AI has actually made up fictional cases and case law.
Isn't that exactly what this judge has done?
AI doesn't draw a salary.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:03 am to cgrand
quote:
Are you opposed to elections in general or just for judges?
I’m opposed to elections for judges but that’s irrelevant here. She’s not fit for office and was rightfully removed from it and disqualified from seeking it. Eboni should have gotten the same treatment.
quote:
they wanted her suspended
With the lame cop out that it was because there was an election. They should have just had the stones to say they didn’t think her behavior warranted removal without a weak qualifier.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 10:04 am
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:06 am to Indefatigable
quote:show me in the dissent where they said her behavior didn’t warrant removal. The decision is on the LSC website. I am not defending that piece of shite judge in any way, she’s unqualified, incompetent and dishonest and belongs nowhere near a courtroom. But you are just making shite up
They should have just had the stones to say they didn’t think her behavior warranted removal
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:27 am to Indefatigable
You should go ahead and take some time and look into what’s going on with AI.
It sounds like you might be surprised.
It sounds like you might be surprised.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:31 am to Indefatigable
quote:
horrible with the law outside of spitting out statutes—which is still makes up out of thin air a lot of the time.
Just like Toffeeny Anne Foxworth. Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:31 am to cgrand
Right now, I see no way to get out of this.
Western culture is doomed.
Humans are destroying it.
Western culture is doomed.
Humans are destroying it.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:31 am to cgrand
quote:
I am not defending that piece of shite judge in any way, she’s unqualified, incompetent and dishonest and belongs nowhere near a courtroom. But you are just making shite up
That's good to know.
On the other hand, does removal from the bench prevent her from seeking reelection?
The suspension would have allowed her to run again, and we can predict that her EBR constituents would have reelected her to continue her glamor parade of incompetence from the bench.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:41 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
Isn't that exactly what this judge has done? AI doesn't draw a salary.
No one is defending her. Quite the contrary.
However, AI is not the answer.
If your argument is true, then it’s a wash. Sounds like you would be happy with the status quo.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:50 am to Indefatigable
quote:
AI is presently horrible with the law outside of spitting out statutes—which is still makes up out of thin air a lot of the time.
This has potential. Play AI crime and punishment roulette with the criminals. Judges can just type the offense into Grok and do whatever it says.
And Grok says…
Speeding ticket = death penalty
Murder= community service
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:56 am to Lou Loomis
quote:
And Grok says…
additional input needed:
-are you an Afrikaner illegal alien?
-are you a billionaire?
-how do you vote?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News