- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:50 am to c on z
quote:
Pure tyranny
Yes, Lemon's harassment of private religious practice indeed was pure tyranny.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 8:51 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:51 am to slidingstop
quote:
possibly. But I also think its odd how sensitive they are to political topics when almost every aspect of our lives is influenced and affected by it. I get tired of it too. But you aren't getting away from it.
"You may not be interested in politics, but politics are most certainly interested in you."
To quote a few different people.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:52 am to cardswinagain
He will love it in jail!! Lots of cock to choose from
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:52 am to c on z
quote:
Pure tyranny
With as much sincerity as possible, eat shite you fricking scum bag.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:55 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
The liberals are gonna be saying that this is a violation of the first amendment
And they are gonna be wrong. You cant "protest" on private property while simultaneously interrupting a religious service.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 8:57 am to c on z
quote:
Pure tyranny
If people stormed a mosque during worship and were arrested for violating the civil rights of the worshippers would you call that tyranny?
FACE Act was put into place to prevent this from happening, and from happening at abortion clinics.
You can't go into a place of worship and intimidate or interfere.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:00 am to Centinel
quote:
Lemon's harassment of private religious practice indeed was pure tyranny.
Except he did not do that. He was only displaying what was taking place.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:02 am to c on z
quote:
Except he did not do that. He was only displaying what was taking place.
He was interfering.
And clearly supportive of the disrupters.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:02 am to c on z
quote:
Except he did not do that. He was only displaying what was taking place.
So you think you could escape facing charges if you went with a group of people to rob a bank just by holding the IPhone and asking the bank manager a couple questions?
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:03 am to c on z
quote:
Except he did not do that. He was only displaying what was taking place.
Do you have to try to be as ignorant on these topics as you are?
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:04 am to cardswinagain
Good
Even if you think it should be legal to storm a church service - I don’t - it’s morally repugnant
Another example of people who can’t stop stepping on their own dicks when trying to make a stand (or in this case, get attention).
Public opinion was shifting, this just gives their opponents ammo because most normal folks are not on team “make kids cry in church”
Stupid.
Even if you think it should be legal to storm a church service - I don’t - it’s morally repugnant
Another example of people who can’t stop stepping on their own dicks when trying to make a stand (or in this case, get attention).
Public opinion was shifting, this just gives their opponents ammo because most normal folks are not on team “make kids cry in church”
Stupid.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:06 am to c on z
No it's not, the pastor asked him to leave multiple times and he sat and argued with him, don't be obtuse and act like he wasn't part of the bullshite.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:06 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Public opinion was shifting
Sure, Jan.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:07 am to c on z
quote:
c on z
Accountability is something you’ve never heard of.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:07 am to GeauxOn
quote:
Sadly because this board is getting older, as are the topics of interest
this and it also feels like there was an exodus of younger posters. now when i open the OT every thread is either bitching about some aspect of society or "this female celeb from the 70s has aged poorly"
new accounts are less likely to be students than some 80 y/o that wants to yell about liberals
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:11 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
The liberals are gonna be saying that this is a violation of the first amendment and that he’s a reporter. I’m not sure he was a reporter because he got up in the face of the preacher. He also said to one of the rioters “thank you for your service“.
Yeah he clearly crossed the line from "neutral observer" to "active participant." Can't use "journalist" as a get out of jail free card.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 9:11 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Why has the OT become the 2nd poli board?
Not an unfair question, but this event goes beyond politics. Invading a church is a scummy thing to do, and he clearly expected his fame to shield him from consequences which made it a big news event.
Popular
Back to top



0








