- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:40 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Did the FBI come to the conclusion that it was human flesh?
We don't know. The fact that we have to say "we don't know" to this question is pretty disheartening tbh. I'm hoping this is not true but, at this point, it is definitely not unreasonable to believe it is.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 9:45 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:45 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Did the FBI come to the conclusion that it was human flesh?
The DOJ per its own statements isn't actively investigating any of it, has held back 3-6M additional files/records and is refusing to release any of their own internal emails on the subject.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:47 am to imjustafatkid
You don't know because your source hasn't told you or you don't know because the FBI didn't come to that conclusion because they have no evidence to lead them to believe that is a conclusion?
Because the FBI has all the information and this theory is just cherry picking information that supports the theory and disregarding the rest.
Because the FBI has all the information and this theory is just cherry picking information that supports the theory and disregarding the rest.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:48 am to fightin tigers
quote:
You don't know because your source hasn't told you or you don't know because the FBI didn't come to that conclusion because they have no evidence to lead them to believe that is a conclusion?
Because the FBI has all the information and this theory is just cherry picking information that supports the theory and disregarding the rest.
Given what has been released, I'm not sure relying on FBI conclusions and investigations is the best idea. It is very clear that a whole lot more people should have been facing charges of some sort, and haven't yet.
ETA: At this point it seems likely that Trump informing on Epstein is part of the reason the "elite" in our country hate him so much.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 9:50 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 9:52 am to imjustafatkid
Going from Investigating to charging is a pretty big step, is it not?
You have to have concrete proof and right now all you have is innuendo and conjecture.
You have to have concrete proof and right now all you have is innuendo and conjecture.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:08 am to bikerack
One of the rare instances where I guessed correctly 
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:08 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Going from Investigating to charging is a pretty big step, is it not?
You have to have concrete proof and right now all you have is innuendo and conjecture.
I guess so. Doesn't mean these people's own words aren't good enough for us to draw conclusions that aren't solid proof that might not be enough for a court of law.
ETA: But hey, by all means, you feel free to defend these people.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 10:09 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:11 am to Ellis Dee
I saw this movie...
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Doesn't mean these people's own words aren't good enough for us to draw conclusions that aren't solid proof that might not be enough for a court of law.
Now you know why certain people wanted these files out so much. No one can go through 3MM pages. Just flood with information and then cherrypick and infect society with juicy talking points.
Perfect propaganda move if you want to sew societal distrust and take down certain groups.
Look at the reaction to this thread and a NOTAM. We were at war with Mexico and Narcos on the first page.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 10:38 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:12 am to fightin tigers
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:22 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
the FAA ordered a 10 day closure, causing airlines to cancel flights today, and then 8 hours later says oopsie?
WTF is going on at the FAA?
We're Jaded Helm to death, so eventually no one even blinks at this stuff.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:33 am to Ellis Dee
quote:
Deadly force could be used on an aircraft if it is determined that it “poses and imminent security threat,” it said, adding that pilots “may be intercepted, detained and interviewed” by law enforcement and security personnel.
This is the case with any TFR
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:40 am to Ellis Dee
They need to follow the drones back to the cartels in Mexico with a Reaper and eliminate the source of the security threat.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:56 am to bikerack
quote:
SCOOP: The unexpected airspace closure in El Paso stemmed from disagreements over drone-related tests, sources told @CBSNews. Pentagon had undertaken extensive planning on use of military tech near Fort Bliss. Two sources identified the technology as a high-energy laser. Earlier this week, tech was used to shoot down what appeared to be foreign drones. The flying material turned out to be a party balloon, sources said. One balloon was shot down. FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford last night decided to close the airspace — without alerting White House, Pentagon or Homeland Security officials. Bedford told officials the airspace restrictions would be in place to ensure safety until issues with the War Department could be resolved. @camiloreports @olivialarinaldi @ellee_watson and me:
The full text.
So it wasn’t a cartel drone? What the hell is this incompetence. Heads should roll for this from multiple agencies.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:06 pm to lionward2014
Can't blame Bedford for this: you find out that military is shooting lasers at objects it can't even identify, you do what you gotta do.
He will still likely be the sacrificial lamb, though.
He will still likely be the sacrificial lamb, though.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:08 pm to lionward2014
Incredible
quote:
Pentagon had undertaken extensive planning on use of military tech near Fort Bliss. Two sources identified the technology as a high-energy laser. Earlier this week, tech was used to shoot down what appeared to be foreign drones. The flying material turned out to be a party balloon, sources said.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:11 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
Can't blame Bedford for this: you find out that military is shooting lasers at objects it can't even identify, you do what you gotta do. He will still likely be the sacrificial lamb, though.
Announcing it for 10 days in the middle of the night with no coordination with Pentagon is pretty insane.
If Ft Bliss is shooting fricking lasers at party balloons and then going on TV saying they are shooting down Mexican Cartel drones, Hegseth has quit a bit of explaining to do as well.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:36 pm to Ellis Dee
Hopefully our guvment is putting all the screetching liberal white woman on a big trip to have fun.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News