- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE agent rammed by lunatic in MN suffered internal bleeding
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:36 pm to jlovel7
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:36 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Is the officer overzealous, maybe
I’ll never understand this caveat
We are talking about deadly force from an officer of the state. If it isn’t the absolute clear cut no doubt about it last frickin resort, then it’s wrong.
1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:37 pm to TX Tiger
quote:Link to it being propaganda?
You post obvious propaganda, and accuse others of "spin."
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:38 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Its very clear cut and absolutely wrong to speed off and ram someone with your car
If it isn’t the absolute clear cut no doubt about it last frickin resort, then it’s wrong.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:41 pm to lsupride87
He’s probably talking about the sped up video you keep posting from the very obvious propaganda account 
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:44 pm to lsupride87
Not related to justification or all that...
Hindsight of the officer walking away from this post getting hit and minimal to no impact elsewhere you think her getting killed was a sufficient tradeoff?
Not what could have happened if she backs up and yada yada.
Hindsight of the officer walking away from this post getting hit and minimal to no impact elsewhere you think her getting killed was a sufficient tradeoff?
Not what could have happened if she backs up and yada yada.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:It's also physically impossible to stand unfazed after being "rammed" by a car and shoot somebody three times at point blank range.
Its very clear cut and absolutely wrong to speed off and ram someone with your car
That's cartoonish at best.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:54 pm to AwesomeSauce
quote:
Allegedly. Unless you have seen photos which her and her mother, and the bystanders claiming her innocence have yet to do.
LINK Yahoo news link
You have to wait until the end of the video but it shows the front end of her white honda civic. It does not appear damaged.
quote:
Not defending the DHS/ICE agents, but that's three items you prefaced as fact that are either false or at the very least being framed as fact without evidence due to prejudice.
As to your other points....I'll concede. I' should've waited a bit to clarify teacher aide vs teacher, and the shared parking lot property. Even the lack of apparent car damage may not be the whole truth. Im, also not a government spokes person much less the head of DHS..or the president.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:57 pm to TX Tiger
I’m sure tons of people who get “viciously run over” by “domestic terrorists” and are “lucky to be alive” and spend time “recovering in the hospital” manage to squeeze 2 shots through the driver’s side window of their attacker without dropping their phone or falling over
Totally normal stuff
He had no other recourse! Despite the fact that, if she had been trying to ram him, he’d be dead after shooting her since the vehicle only lost control once her corpse was laying on the gas. Thankfully she was cranking her steering wheel away from him when he shot her in the face.
Totally normal stuff
He had no other recourse! Despite the fact that, if she had been trying to ram him, he’d be dead after shooting her since the vehicle only lost control once her corpse was laying on the gas. Thankfully she was cranking her steering wheel away from him when he shot her in the face.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:08 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:And then proceed to walk down the block to the vehicle, and back again, get in a van and leave.
I’m sure tons of people who get “viciously run over” by “domestic terrorists” and are “lucky to be alive” and spend time “recovering in the hospital” manage to squeeze 2 shots through the driver’s side window of their attacker without dropping their phone or falling over
Totally normal stuff
Putting out the propaganda that he suffered internal bleeding makes me think of the defensive football player who suddenly drops to the ground to stop the opponents' hurry-up offense and force the referee to call time-out.
It's beyond comical.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:14 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:This better?
He’s probably talking about the sped up video you keep posting from the very obvious propaganda account
Gives you normal speed, 1/2 speed, 1/3 speed
Anyone who says the agent was not hit is on drugs. Good drugs too
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:17 pm to lsupride87
quote:
This better?
Literally anything is better. It hasn’t even loaded yet and I’m proud of you.
quote:
Anyone who says the agent was not hit is on drugs.
Agreed. There was contact. That’s not the debate.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:22 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Agreed. There was contact. That’s not the debate.
Are we really debating at what speed you’re allowed to hit an officer of the law with your car with? The answer is zero.
There’s no way to know you won’t immediately speed up and try and hit more people. You just don’t know.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:24 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Are we really debating at what speed you’re allowed to hit an officer of the law with your car with?
Nope
quote:
There’s no way to know you won’t immediately speed up and try and hit more people. You just don’t know.
As mentioned, she did immediately speed up - or at least her dead body did after the gunshot
So how did those 3 shots - 2 through the driver’s side window - protect everyone’s safety?
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:30 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I’m sure tons of people who get “viciously run over” by “domestic terrorists” and are “lucky to be alive” and spend time “recovering in the hospital” manage to squeeze 2 shots through the driver’s side window of their attacker without dropping their phone or falling over
You forgot "fricking bitch".
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:32 pm to lsupride87
So did the chick behind the wheel, along with external bleeding.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:33 pm to lsupride87
If you believe that, I've got some waterfront property to sell you in Arizona.
Fox News LMAO.....credible source there buttercup.
Fox News LMAO.....credible source there buttercup.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:37 pm to moon
quote:
If you believe that, I've got some waterfront property to sell you in Arizona.
Fox News LMAO.....credible source there buttercup.
Maybe you should have read more before commenting…
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:39 pm to greygoose
quote:
So did the chick behind the wheel, along with external bleeding.
Both ultimately caused by her arrogance thinking she was above the law.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 4:41 pm to jlovel7
quote:
but it doesn’t take much for a car to go from zero to lethal and this woman attempted to speed off with multiple officers in front of and around the car.
Ah yeah it was very lethal as she turned her wheel away from the officers and he stepped to the side of the car and fired two bullets in to her skull and then called her a fricking bitch.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:10 pm to ThuperThumpin
My argument isn't that certain elements you presented weren't true. My argument is that my BS meter starts going off on a story when truth is bent from the get go on articles that would appear to have no bearing on the incident in question. Her occupation other than as a school employee has no bearing on the situation, so why is it given falsely by all (or at least the majority of the articles). The location of the school being in a shared parking lot with several foreign owned businesses would give credence as to why DHS may be present. Why do the articles and witness testimony make it sound like it's not, or present it as being a standalone parking lot just for the school? That is intentional to make the story even more sensational, because rightfully so a SPED school parking is somewhere DHS shouldn't be ethically, but that's not the whole story, and it's given in part with very clear intent.
I cannot accept the parts that may be true on face value when several components are being intentionally skewed. If you lie about the occupation, have an entire section on why DHS shouldn't be there leaving out crucial details as to why they very well could be in the area...either the reporting is half assed, or sensationalized. Either way it doesn't pass the smell test. Dig deeper into more of these stories and this isn't the only one. People are being radicalized on both sides with half truths and maybes.
I cannot accept the parts that may be true on face value when several components are being intentionally skewed. If you lie about the occupation, have an entire section on why DHS shouldn't be there leaving out crucial details as to why they very well could be in the area...either the reporting is half assed, or sensationalized. Either way it doesn't pass the smell test. Dig deeper into more of these stories and this isn't the only one. People are being radicalized on both sides with half truths and maybes.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News