Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Madison Brooks' Dad Lawsuit | Page 19 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Madison Brooks' Dad Lawsuit

Posted on 12/4/23 at 2:10 am to
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12451 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 2:10 am to
quote:

It will be difficult to assign liability to the men who dropped her off. Their actions may have been despicable after they left the bar and raped her, but once they let her out of the car neither the driver or the other passengers had any responsibility for what she did or what anyone else did. In fact the men who were not driving had no control over her or the drive.


Seriously? …


Yes. There is no basis to assign legal liability to them. They did not throw her out in the middle of the road They will testify they let her out of the car where she requested and left. She is an adult woman who left the safety of the sidewalk and entered the roadway. Their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability.
Posted by patnuh
South LA
Member since Sep 2005
7429 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 6:35 am to
quote:

She is an adult woman who left the safety of the sidewalk and entered the roadway


You getting sued or something?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 6:39 am to
quote:

If you are going to file a suit, you sue anyone who could reasonably have some percentage of responsibility. Its up to the courts to decide if they don't.




This is why everyone hates lawyers.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63186 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 6:48 am to
quote:

Her death is tragic, but this screams trying to make a profit off it


How many millions did Alton Sterling's family get from the city when he got killed trying to pull a gun (while committing a crime) on a police officer? The Madison Brooks case at least has some merit, but suing the Lyft driver doesn't seem necessary.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14579 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 6:58 am to
quote:

tigersbb


They let her out on a divided 4 lane hwy while extremely intoxicated blocks away from her home. Dont be stupid

Not mention he mental state after allegedly being raped
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
43825 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

They will testify they let her out of the car where she requested and left


She wanted out because they raped her. Are you giving them props for not adding kidnapping to their charges?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
94798 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:17 am to
quote:

She is an adult woman who left the safety of the sidewalk and entered the roadway. Their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability.


As unpopular of an opinion that is, I agree with it and it's how it will play out.

However, the bar for civil liability is quite low
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:27 am to
quote:

It will be difficult to assign liability to the men who dropped her off. Their actions may have been despicable after they left the bar and raped her, but once they let her out of the car neither the driver or the other passengers had any responsibility for what she did or what anyone else did. In fact the men who were not driving had no control over her or the drive.



So if I knew you couldn’t swim and I pushed you in a pool and you drowned, I wouldn’t be at fault bc I had no control over whether you could swim or not or not responsible for anyone trying to save you or jumping in and saving you myself
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4214 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:28 am to
Did you just ponder whether or not the boys who raped a girl in a vehicle might have had the decency to drop her off somewhere safely?
Posted by Rick9Plus
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2020
2457 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Did you just ponder whether or not the boys who raped a girl in a vehicle might have had the decency to drop her off somewhere safely?


Lol right?
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
10559 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:34 am to
quote:

If you are going to file a suit, you sue anyone who could reasonably have some percentage of responsibility. Its up to the courts to decide if they don't.

The one thing I remember from Business Law 101 was taught on the first day of class:
When in doubt, sue everyone in sight and let the courts sort it out.
This post was edited on 12/4/23 at 8:35 am
Posted by White Bear
Deer-Thirty
Member since Jul 2014
17410 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:39 am to
quote:

The one thing I remember from Business Law 101 was taught on the first day of class: When in doubt, sue everyone in sight and let the courts sort it out.
A lawyer teaches the class, moron.
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
2203 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Yes. There is no basis to assign legal liability to them. They did not throw her out in the middle of the road They will testify they let her out of the car where she requested and left. She is an adult woman who left the safety of the sidewalk and entered the roadway. Their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability.



Of course they are being truthful. The victim requested to be let out in that exact spot.
So when a defendant says "I didn't do it" that's evidence enough for an acquittal.

Also like the guys in the car had no control of her or the drive. If they were raping her, as you stated, that act alone implies control of a victim/situation without consent.







Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability.

Bro, yes they can.

You can sue people you accuse of raping you.

quote:

They did not throw her out in the middle of the road They will testify they let her out of the car where she requested and left. She is an adult woman who left the safety of the sidewalk and entered the roadway.

THIS liability is unlikely, correct.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:07 am to
quote:

If they were raping her, as you stated, that act alone implies control of a victim/situation without consent.

This is a stretch. The "lack of consent" is a legal theory to create a new crime and only applies to that specific instance.

You're trying to impute that very narrow legal definition to another, unrelated area. I doubt that dog will hunt.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
45648 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Maybe if parents would actually adult up and parent instead of trying to be their kids' bff to get one over on their ex, this kind of preventable thing wouldn't happen. So many people are stuck up their own asses and try to justify to themselves that pursuing a Jody or a side chick is "good" because it makes them "happy". They forget (or don't care?) that their highest duty is to properly raise the young lives they bring into the world.

This case is disturbing on so many levels. Of course the young males should not have acted like rabid hyenas around unguarded fresh meat. Their parents failed to teach them right from wrong, and there is only one thing that can be done with rabid hyenas. But her parents failed her, too.



How do you know any of this applies to Maddie’s parents? This rant will score points on this board but what does it have to do with this particular case?
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12451 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability.

Bro, yes they can.

You can sue people you accuse of raping you.


OK, I wasn't clear, counselor. What I meant was their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability for the subsequent accident which took her life.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I wasn't clear, counselor. What I meant was their criminal actions in raping her do not equate to civil liability for the subsequent accident which took her life.


Fair enough.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:27 am to
quote:

and the Lyft driver who fatally struck her.


This is how you lose sympathy.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12451 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:

It will be difficult to assign liability to the men who dropped her off. Their actions may have been despicable after they left the bar and raped her, but once they let her out of the car neither the driver or the other passengers had any responsibility for what she did or what anyone else did. In fact the men who were not driving had no control over her or the drive.



So if I knew you couldn’t swim and I pushed you in a pool and you drowned, I wouldn’t be at fault bc I had no control over whether you could swim or not or not responsible for anyone trying to save you or jumping in and saving you myself


You would be culpable in this instance because you shoved the person into the water.

If the men let Ms. Brooks out in the middle of the road and she was immediately struck that would probably impute liability to them. However, they apparently told the authorities they let her out at the entrance to the subdivision as requested.
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19 20 21 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram