Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Man charged with murder after he shot and killed an armed home intruder | Page 5 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Man charged with murder after he shot and killed an armed home intruder

Posted on 1/14/26 at 7:09 am to
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16249 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 7:09 am to
He could easily be charged if there was evidence that the shooting did not occur under the castle doctrine.

- The deceased was originally just wounded, then executed?
- The deceased was shot outside and dragged inside?
- The deceased gave up immediately, pled for his life, then killed?

There are obviously more possibilities. I’ll wait for more details if OP follows up later.
Posted by Chingon Ag
Member since Nov 2018
4050 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 7:18 am to
Most perplexing part of the story to me is that a guy in Big Spring spells Florez with a Z and not a S. Maybe that flies in big city Dallas but sure as hell not in pinche “Big Springs”.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 7:22 am
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31448 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I am going to ask this and im not being a dick so what?

Not a dick question at all, as long as he was inside the home. Now outside in the front yard? Different discussion.

But hoss, you break into my house, armed, at night, and come face to face with 5000 candles of light off the end of an AR and realize you chose poorly and turn and run? Hollow points work just as good from the rear, and you lost your right for fair when you chose to put my family in danger.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6930 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

(4)(a) When committed by a person lawfully inside a dwelling, a place of business, or a motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1(40) when the conflict began, against a person who is attempting to make an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, or who has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, and the person committing the homicide reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the entry or to compel the intruder to leave the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle.


Wow... That doesn't even mention fear for your life.. It's just to prevent entry.. That's awesome!!
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32256 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Wow... That doesn't even mention fear for your life.. It's just to prevent entry.. That's awesome!!

Yep. It's why I find some of the ignorance based histrionics over the issue frustrating, as people spread bad information. On the one hand, you frequently have people thinking they can shoot through the door if someone is shouting or knocking too hard; on the other hand, you have people who act like you have the giant hurdles to clear in order to defend yourself in your own home. Neither is accurate, and as much as I bitch about huge swaths Louisiana law, our laws on the books regarding self defense are, while not perfect, pretty damned reasonable.
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3980 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 10:04 am to
"I feared for my life and my family's life officer". And stop talking.

IF, the homeowner had USCCA would they drop this case now since he was charged? If it's a marginal situation.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram