- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marriage: Who benefits more?
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:06 am to Globetrotter747
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:06 am to Globetrotter747
Both initially if divorced the woman and the attorneys.
0
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:55 am to Globetrotter747
1 children
2 society
3 extended family
4 schools/churches
5 the spouses
2 society
3 extended family
4 schools/churches
5 the spouses
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:23 am to Globetrotter747
It's not a competition.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:27 am to Globetrotter747
Consider human nature. Speaking broadly-Marriage serves the nature of women. It provides her security and status improvement . It conflicts with the nature of man. It denies him sexual freedom and turns the fruits of his labor over to his wife. So a man has to make an appeal to his better angels and deny his dominant biological urges in a way that is hard for a woman to understand.
If one has an awesome marriage I would think these questions of nature are beside the point and both benefit. But if one’s wife is a selfish troll, the man can basically become an indentured servant of sorts. His must deny his nature, serve her nature , and to what end?
Bottom line - marry well . I make 25 years this month.
If one has an awesome marriage I would think these questions of nature are beside the point and both benefit. But if one’s wife is a selfish troll, the man can basically become an indentured servant of sorts. His must deny his nature, serve her nature , and to what end?
Bottom line - marry well . I make 25 years this month.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:40 am to Globetrotter747
I will have to ask my wife what I think. Be right back.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:42 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Consider human nature. Speaking broadly-Marriage serves the nature of women. It provides her security and status improvement . It conflicts with the nature of man. It denies him sexual freedom and turns the fruits of his labor over to his wife. So a man has to make an appeal to his better angels and deny his dominant biological urges in a way that is hard for a woman to understand.
Currently reading the book Sapiens. The first people were not in monogamous relationships. Everyone slept with everyone. When a woman had a child, each man in the village was responsible for raising each child as if it was his child. Instead of having one partner to raise a child, a woman had many. Having only one partner would benefit a woman less in raising children. To say it is human nature for only a man to want to sleep around isn’t true, women have benefited from whoring around since the beginning of time too.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:42 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Marriage is a construct of the patriarchy to keep women subjugated.
And now that lesbians can marry, it's double the sujugation!!!!
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:44 am to Globetrotter747
quote:
Marriage: Who benefits more?
1) The caterer
2) The band you hire for the reception
3) The person who sells the bride the overpriced wedding dress
4) The people who charge ridiculous amounts for the reception hall.
5) The photographer who takes 100000 pics using every possible permutation to take a pic (ok..now lets get a shot of the cousins of the brothers of the groom, etc)
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:45 am to Globetrotter747
Its women and it aint even close.
Kids make it a 100% batting avg.
Kids make it a 100% batting avg.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:28 am to Globetrotter747
Women.
They get half your stuff.
They get half your stuff.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:28 am to Globetrotter747
kids.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:46 am to Tygra
quote:
Currently reading the book Sapiens. The first people were not in monogamous relationships. Everyone slept with everyone. When a woman had a child, each man in the village was responsible for raising each child as if it was his child. Instead of having one partner to raise a child, a woman had many. Having only one partner would benefit a woman less in raising children. To say it is human nature for only a man to want to sleep around isn’t true, women have benefited from whoring around since the beginning of time too.
We already have this in 2019, except a lot of the people exhibiting this behavior only care about the making children part and totally ignore the providing and raising part.
That worked when everyone worked together to survive and every waking moment was trying to survive.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:50 am to Tygra
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 9:09 am
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:55 am to Globetrotter747
I get to have a fine arse woman around me all the time...so I’d say I do.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 12:36 pm to BlackCoffeeKid
quote:
There's a passage in that book that's going to really make you think twice about having kids.
Mind sharing?
Posted on 10/9/19 at 12:53 pm to Globetrotter747
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/6/20 at 9:09 am
Posted on 10/9/19 at 12:59 pm to MikeBRLA
Or if he loves his woman.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 1:00 pm to Bazzatcha
quote:
The kids
bingo
As far as between the spouses, it's whichever is more dependent one. I don't know if I could say it swings harder toward females or males.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 1:08 pm to Globetrotter747
Man, some of yall over analyze everything. This question is impossible to answer because there are millions of different situations.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News