- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Thread: Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:07 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:07 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
News: two passengers listed on manifest were not on plane. Probably indicates stolen passports for these two.
0
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:09 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Don't planes have tracking devices on them or something? [Genuine question.] How does a plane simply disappear? Even if it blew up or crashed, wouldn't they know the last known location before explosion/crash/terrorist/whatever?
I'm sure there's a lot of information that isn't being released to the general public right now.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:10 pm to Da Sheik
The plane flew to space. They're probably near the moon right now.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The limited release of information speaks volumes.
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Perhaps if the fall was rapid enough maybe they would blackout or at least get so disoriented that they would it be "all there" on the way down.
Worst of all there were 3 babies on there.
Worst of all there were 3 babies on there.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:29 pm to OldHickory
quote:
The limited release of information speaks volumes.
What does it say?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:42 pm to Tempratt
quote:Wouldn't?
would it
Couldn't help it.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 3:54 pm to Patrick_Bateman
lose NOT loose. How can people confuse these two?
BTW, all those people saying malfunctions don't bring down planes from cruising altitude. Review that disaster a few years back off South America where they went in from 30,000 plus feet. That was some weird combo of malfunction followed by massive pilot error.
BTW, all those people saying malfunctions don't bring down planes from cruising altitude. Review that disaster a few years back off South America where they went in from 30,000 plus feet. That was some weird combo of malfunction followed by massive pilot error.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:08 pm to jbgleason
quote:
BTW, all those people saying malfunctions don't bring down planes from cruising altitude. Review that disaster a few years back off South America where they went in from 30,000 plus feet. That was some weird combo of malfunction followed by massive pilot error.
I thought the pilots turned off the de-icer in a heavy storm at high altitude? Wings iced up and they didn't recognize a stall.
Most modern crashes are human error.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:16 pm to Traffic Circle
It says they don't have a clue what happened or where this plane is. Disappeared into thin air.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:17 pm to redstick13
That's mostly correct except the warning probe for the wing icing failed because it froze. They then went into a stall and did all the wrong things to recover. Can't imagine having to ride it in from that high. Breaking up would be so much better.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:19 pm to BeerCity
quote:
It says they don't have a clue what happened or where this plane is. Disappeared into thin air.
Or does it say that they are hiding something, or trying to come up with a story?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:27 pm to Traffic Circle
quote:
Or does it say that they are hiding something, or trying to come up with a story?
If this was the case, don't you think they would have a story ready to go?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:31 pm to fbb
quote:
If this was the case, don't you think they would have a story ready to go?
Remember this response for when the conspiracy folks start with their shite.
Go start a rumor on the PT board that there were two "international" bankers or someone involved with bitcoin on board.
As of now, I would think if it were terror related, someone would have claimed responsibility.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:35 pm to fbb
Someone obviously used an unapproved wireless device, or was standing up when the fasten seat belt sign was on.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:45 pm to dustoff
Would there just be an oil slick or would you see any debris? I guess a plane going down from that altitude and the potential currents in the ocean could just suck all debris under. It's going to take a deepwater submersible to find that thing.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:56 pm to BeerCity
Is it almost daylight over there by now?
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:57 pm to BeerCity
quote:.
Would there just be an oil slick or would you see any debris? I guess a plane going down from that altitude and the potential currents in the ocean could just suck all debris under. It's going to take a deepwater submersible to find that thing.
You'd have a debris field. The size of which would tell you if the aircraft broke apart in the air or on impact.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 5:08 pm to RedFoxx
quote:
As of now, I would think if it were terror related, someone would have claimed responsibility.
You would think some jack-leg terrorist group would claim responsibility just to get their name out there.
Posted on 3/8/14 at 5:28 pm to BeerCity
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/8/14 at 5:58 pm
Page 9 of 375
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News