- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Savannah Guthrie’s mom missing - being held for ransom - suspect photos released
Posted on 2/17/26 at 10:48 am to HouseMom
Posted on 2/17/26 at 10:48 am to HouseMom
quote:
The truth of the matter is that Savannah Guthrie's husband is named in the Epstein files and worked for Bill Clinton. She was also instrumental in ruining Prince Albert by interviewing the victims. These are VERY connected people, not just a random news anchor.
Agreed.
There's more circumstantial evidence supporting an Epstein connection than there is any other theory.
1
Posted on 2/17/26 at 10:52 am to lionward2014
quote:
and not once did I need to show a passport or have my car inspected to go into MX. That would be extremely easy to do if they wanted to.
There are cameras on the US side of any road going into Mexico even dirt tracts. There are also a lot of plate readers on the US side near the border. Mexico has inspection stations 15 miles in on all the highways. US Border Patrol will stop people trying to cross the border heading south to interdict the flow of cash and weapons to the cartels.
For organized kidnappers, moving her would be risky. Most likely she is within 30 miles of where she was kidnapped, probably dumped or buried.
The perpetrator could be anywhere. In the wealthy elder robberies turned murder cases in Baton Rouge area, the perps were all arrested out of the state.
I still think it was someone who did work at the house who intended to rob the lady. When she didn't have a lot of money, he decided to take her for some ransom. She either dropped dead from the stress of the situation or he killed her then dumped/buried her in the desert. He tried the ransom requests using AI.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:06 pm to Shaun176
Your theory makes zero sense
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:11 pm to Tiger Ryno
quote:
Your theory makes zero sense
Why?
I think it's a decent theory... although I'm still leaning towards an accident that the son in law is covering up for, personally.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:19 pm to HouseMom
quote:
She was also instrumental in ruining Prince Albert by interviewing the victims.
Did she get him canned?
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:24 pm to HouseMom
quote:just for the sake of correctness here.
She was also instrumental in ruining Prince Albert by interviewing the victims.
Prince Albert ruined Prince Albert by being a POS human
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:46 pm to SuperSaint
Welp, no match on the DNA in CODIS
Back to square one.
Back to square one.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:54 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Welp, no match on the DNA in CODIS
Safe to say this guy is not a seasoned criminal then yea?
Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:57 pm to Lsut81
quote:
The FBI can’t use the CODIS system for the glove unless the glove is tested in the state where it was found -- Arizona.
The glove has now been sent to Arizona.
As for why the Pima County Sheriff decided to send the glove to Florida, knowing the glove would have to be re-tested in Arizona ... that’s up to the experts to explain.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/17/26 at 12:59 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
The unknown male DNA profile on a glove found two miles from the home of Nancy Guthrie has been run through the FBI’s DNA database – and did not result in any hits, Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos told Fox News chief correspondent Jonathan Hunt in an interview on Tuesday.
DNA recovered from Guthrie's home also did not match records in the FBI database, Nanos said. The sheriff confirmed that the DNA on the glove was different from the DNA found inside the home.
The FBI confirmed the news to Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
“We're hopeful that we're always getting closer, but the news now, I think, is we had heard this morning that, of course, the DNA on the glove that was found two miles away was submitted for CODIS. And I just heard that, CODIS had no hits,” Nanos said.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:00 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Welp, no match on the DNA in CODIS
Also, glove DNA did not match any DNA at the crime scene.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:03 pm to Decatur
quote:
Also, glove DNA did not match any DNA at the crime scene.
Well, reason why is 90% of the gloves found were believed to be searchers disgarded gloves... why would a LEOs DNA pop up in CODIS
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:10 pm to Decatur
quote:
, glove DNA did not match any DNA at the crime scene.
They need to focus on comparing the video to people who have bought the back pack, gun, or who have worked at the house (pool maintenance, gardener, bug guy, roofer). They also need to subpoena the major AI companies for the ransom letters.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:12 pm to Shaun176
Sheriff, who seems to be a frickup from the word go but nontheless, has come out and said he does not think it was a robbery gone bad, he believes this was a kidnapping through and through.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:23 pm to Lsut81
quote:
has come out and said he does not think it was a robbery gone bad, he believes this was a kidnapping through and through.
I don't think it was a random robbery. I think he targeted her because he thought she had gold, money, jewelry, other valuables in the house. I think the plan was to force her to give up the valuables. That is why he was in the house so long. When he realized the stuff she had wasn't a jackpot, he took her for ransom. If the plan was just a kidnapping, he would have been in and out in few minutes. If this were cartel or Epstein cover up pros, they would have they would have gotten in and out in seconds.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:35 pm to Shaun176
This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 2/17/26 at 1:59 pm to Tiger Ryno
This was an inside job … plain and obvious
Posted on 2/17/26 at 2:25 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
just for the sake of correctness here. Prince Albert ruined Prince Albert by being a POS human
Oh, completely. I just meant that Savannah Guthrie was the one who interviewed Virginia Guiffre. She was his main accuser.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 2:58 pm to Shaun176
quote:
When he realized the stuff she had wasn't a jackpot, he took her for ransom
So he left behind everything and took her instead? They have said there is 0 evidence of a break in or burglary, of course they could be lying or incompetent, but the Sheriffs statement around him believing it was a targeted kidnapping has to be based on some of the facts.
Posted on 2/17/26 at 3:00 pm to lionward2014
quote:
I have driven/walked across the US/MX border into MX hundreds of times, more often than not with a car with Louisiana plates, and not once did I need to show a passport or have my car inspected to go into MX. That would be extremely easy to do if they wanted to.
Interesting. I have been hunting about 2 1/2 hours into Mexico since early 2000s and have crossed at Laredo, Eagle Pass, but mostly the Columbia International Bridge about 15 miles West of Laredo and I can tell you that just about every time we go in... 4-5 times a year... we get a red light 98% of the time. They almost always take a cursory look at your passport.
You didn't say how far you travel into Mexico but I can also tell you if you drive more than 15 minutes or so into the country from the border they are going to be looking for U.S. license plates without a car permit. You absolutely cannot get a car permit without your passport and without making copies of your passport.
Page 91 of 96
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News