Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us CWD Concordia Parish | Page 2 | Outdoor Board
Started By
Message

re: CWD Concordia Parish

Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61077 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

He already had both deer together in one ice chest. Green jeans came to his house to collect the meat, he had to give them both deer because it was mixed up at that point.

Shitty way to lose 2 buck tags!
Seems WLF could bring him the next couple they confiscated from illegal hunters to offset, just as a good will gesture I suppose. Cleaned and ready to process of course
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20686 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:33 pm to
Go read the thread about who killing duck for context on my comment.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
4564 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

It’s sad that people still make this false claim with what we now know about the CWD situation in NW Arkansas.
yeah the deer are dying WITH cwd….. not FROM.
Posted by Ron Cheramie
The Cajun Hedgehog
Member since Aug 2016
5602 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

yeah the deer are dying WITH cwd….. not FROM.


CWD is always fatal

Seems that CWD hasn’t been around in Louisiana very long but after a few years its prevalence rate will go up and you will start seeing deer with clinical signs of CWD. Arkansas and North MS along the TN border are further along than us and there is a very noticed decrease in deer population and a very noticeable increase in deer sightings with CWD symptoms that turn out to be positive

It’s here to stay and it’s going to change our deer hunting I personally want to know where CWD is so I can avoid hunting those areas for as long as possible and to be able to know where it is you have to test for it.

Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
4564 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

CWD is always fatal
“Always?” you have proof to back that up?
quote:

you will start seeing deer with clinical signs of CWD. Arkansas and North MS along the TN border are further along than us and there is a very noticed decrease in deer population
from CWD or from game warden’s shooting every deer that lives under bait with thermal scopes? Easy to say the population has decreased when you slaughter a whole heard in one county because of two positives test.
quote:

I personally want to know where CWD is so I can avoid hunting those areas for as long as possible and to be able to know where it is you have to test for it.
so you personally want to avoid some of the best deer states, and the best parishes/counties for deer hunting? Along with any hunting land period? Because it’s everywhere whether you like or not. Got it.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 3:02 pm
Posted by Sparty3131
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2019
916 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:59 pm to
If they ban feeding would the price of leases go down?
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20686 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 3:23 pm to
We have also seen this happen in SW Wisconsin.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2319 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:01 pm to
Oddly, the severity in Wisconsin, while having been ground zero for longer than NW AR, has not seen as significant impacts that Ark has. 50% of 2.5 year old bucks test positive and it has worsened over the course of a few years. That is not a sign of something that’s always been here! Unless something changes 4.5 year old and older bucks may be practically gone forever.
Posted by Ron Cheramie
The Cajun Hedgehog
Member since Aug 2016
5602 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

“Always?” you have proof to back that up?


Come on man
Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
4564 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Come on man
your words not mine.
Posted by Ol boy
Member since Oct 2018
4096 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

50% of 2.5 year old bucks test positive and it has worsened over the course of a few years. That is not a sign of something that’s always been here! Unless something changes 4.5 year old and older bucks may be practically gone forever.

With those kinds of statistics SE la will never experience an issue with CWD because there is only like 10 deer in the entire region that make it to 4.5yrs old
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26687 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

I will say the impact of high density


This is what it's all about. You have to kill deer and people, especially along the river have no desire to kill the numbers needed.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2319 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:52 pm to
Haha. I’ve thought of that angle. Unfortunately, when over 50% have the disease, I think all deer will be regarded as vermin and antler size won’t really matter.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 5:53 pm
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26687 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

That is not a sign of something that’s always been here!


How long as the testing been taking place?
Posted by Jim Hopper
Ocean Springs Mississippi
Member since Sep 2019
4564 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

How long as the testing been taking place?
1999 in Wisco, 2002 in LA rest of the U.S. later than that. So the comment that says it hasn’t always been here is pretty much nullified when you’re only relying on less than 25 years of data.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9157 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:25 pm to
Is it Illinois that has been shooting a ton of deer to reduce the herd numbers, which has slowed the spread?
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20686 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:38 pm to
Wisconsin did they same thing and it didn't change the rate of spread.


I am going to get a ton of down votes but I don't care. It is only a matter of time time before a case of cjd gets tied back to infected deer meat and then it's game over. As someone who has had a family member die of it and went down the rabbit hole and talked to medical/science professionals that statement is not false. The function of transmission is the same as mad cow, there is no difference. The difference is the exposure rate of susceptible people to infected venison. That being said everything about prions, from start to finish is very understudied and still unknown.

This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 6:50 pm
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1668 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

It’s sad that people still make this false claim with what we now know about the CWD situation in NW Arkansas.


Yeah, I’ve said multiple times that the sampling results in Louisiana obviously disprove the idea that it has always been present throughout the herd.

Doesn’t stop the idiots from spouting and spreading their retardation though.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26687 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Jim Hopper


Thanks
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
26687 posts
Posted on 1/7/26 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Illinois


I don’t believe we’ve killed anymore deer than normal over the last few years, however I do believe it’s why they’ve increased the number of non resident tags.

Illinois is and has been extremely strict with no baiting or supplements. Not sure if that means much but whatever they’re doing, it seems to be working.
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 7:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram