- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What is y’all’s thoughts on trump and NFA?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 7:46 am
Posted on 12/3/24 at 7:46 am
Do yall see him doing anything major in regards to the NFA? Anything on suppressors? Just curious as yall are my go to on stuff like this
8
Posted on 12/3/24 at 8:04 am to PT24-7
at the most, the new director will probably back off on some of the more recent rulings that are currently being litigated:
pistol brace
FRTs
frames and receivers
but that's wishful thinking. Trump is pro-red-flag-laws so don't expect much pro-gun legislation to come through this administration.
pistol brace
FRTs
frames and receivers
but that's wishful thinking. Trump is pro-red-flag-laws so don't expect much pro-gun legislation to come through this administration.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 8:14 am to finchmeister08
Dang, I was hoping for more abolish the ATF type optimism
Posted on 12/3/24 at 8:23 am to PT24-7
It's too much money for them, no matter who is in charge. They will throw us some bones, likely as poster above said, and we will keep paying $200 a pop.....
Posted on 12/3/24 at 8:43 am to Fachie
Supreme Court just heard Vanderstok vs Garland. I’m no lawyer so please correct me…the case involved upper, lowers and parts for making “ghost guns” as they call them. Suppressors are included in the argument. If the ruling goes well the ATF will have to remove “parts” that don’t actually create a gun. That would include suppressors. We should all be bombardig the justices with emails..ruling should come down by July
Posted on 12/3/24 at 11:08 am to PT24-7
quote:no
Do yall see him doing anything major in regards to the NFA?
the ATF as an enforcement tool will be useful to him and the NFA reduces risk to the ATF and keeps it funded and deployed
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:16 pm to PT24-7
quote:
Do yall see him doing anything major in regards to the NFA? Anything on suppressors? Just curious as yall are my go to on stuff like this
His unconstitutional order on bump stocks should have given you some insight.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:20 pm to MoarKilometers
I'd be interested on the Chevron case and how applicable it is to things like the NFA and the making of laws by unauthorized entities like the ATF.
Similar to the EPA overstep.
Seems cut and dry and it is only a matter of time before this too falls.
Until they actually create a law to stop it.
Similar to the EPA overstep.
Seems cut and dry and it is only a matter of time before this too falls.
Until they actually create a law to stop it.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:36 pm to PT24-7
Bump stock ban happened in his first term. Don't expect him to do us many favors in this space.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:16 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
What’s the latest on bump stocks and pistol braces? Are they legal again?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 7:24 pm to PT24-7
There was some optimism at the beginning of first term that legislation would change the law on suppressors. The Las Vegas massacre in 2017 seemed to chill that optimism even though a suppressor was not used.
There are still bills floating around to make silencers sales similar to sales of long-guns, but there are also bills to completely ban the sale, importation, possession, etc. A list of them is at this site. American Suppressor Association
There are still bills floating around to make silencers sales similar to sales of long-guns, but there are also bills to completely ban the sale, importation, possession, etc. A list of them is at this site. American Suppressor Association
Posted on 12/3/24 at 7:31 pm to PT24-7
Trump is not conservative, pro gun or pro freedom... where do you get that he will improve gun laws when his records has him doing the opposite.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 9:50 pm to PT24-7
quote:
What’s the latest on bump stocks
100% legal based on SCOTUS decision earlier this year
quote:
pistol braces?
legal for now due to the 5th Circuit decision. expect an appeal from the Feds if there isn't one already. it, too, will probably come down to a SCOTUS decision
Posted on 12/3/24 at 10:23 pm to armsdealer
I should have clarified that his SC seems to be pro 2nd amendment
Posted on 12/4/24 at 8:15 am to PT24-7
Chevron Decision is going to do more damage to the NFA than Trump.
Trump is realistically apathetic to soft anti-2A. He was president when they banned bump stocks, and he has mentioned red flag laws in a positive light.
Trump is realistically apathetic to soft anti-2A. He was president when they banned bump stocks, and he has mentioned red flag laws in a positive light.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 8:48 am to Jcorye1
^^ agreed, I like Trump but he's not the 2nd Amenment POTUS we need - hoping that an upcoming President Vance will be more in that vein
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 8:54 am
Posted on 12/4/24 at 2:58 pm to Don Quixote
Today's assassination of the health insurance CEO with a suppressed weapon won't help either.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:51 pm to s0tiger
New York has laws against that pistol.
They didn't stop anything.
They didn't stop anything.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 5:50 pm to TrueTiger
I 100% agree, but it will be latched on to by media, politicians and Karens
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News