- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 km deep cylindrical shock pillars found below pyramids
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:17 pm to shinerfan
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:17 pm to shinerfan
quote:
The precise orientation would still be difficult, borderline impossible, today.
No it wouldn't. You idiot. We can crash two atoms at near the speed of light and observe the results. You think we couldn't build and orient a fricking stone pyramid?
frick.
2
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:18 pm to Gaston
quote:
There are sites all over the world that suggest very advanced civilizations were here long before we ever imagine. The pyramids could be 50,000 years old just as easy, or easier, than they could be 5,000.
Graham Hancock has proven that traditional archeology has been totally wrong with its dates.
It's an easy Google.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:20 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Graham Hancock has proven that traditional archeology has been totally wrong with its dates.
He has been wrong and exaggerated a shite ton. He's a very smart nutcase who only poses theories with zero evidence.
But conspiracy theorists love him.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Even if it wasn't slaves, they were built by the richest civilization by the pharaoh. They had plenty to pay thousands.
Of course.... Your in the total wrong side again.
It must suck being you!!!!
NO! I'm not doing your homework for you, you would just refuse to consider anyway.
Graham Hancock has repeatedly proved traditional archeology wrong.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:24 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Graham Hancock has repeatedly proved traditional archeology wrong.
No he hasn't. Just because you say he did, doesn't make it truth. Plenty of respected scientists have disputed his theories, with actual data.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:28 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
quote:
Graham Hancock has proven that traditional archeology has been totally wrong with its dates.
He has been wrong and exaggerated a shite ton. He's a very smart nutcase who only poses theories with zero evidence.
But conspiracy theorists love him
I don't consider myself a theorist, but it's kinda odd that nobody will debate him! The same type of bureaucracy that controls politics, exerts the same over ever aspect of human existence.
We can argue about this all day , and neither will be able to prove conclusively either way.
I believe things are much different than what we're told. Especially after going thru the dark ages where the Catholic Church dictated what could and could not be said.
Remember???? It was heresy to say the Earth wasn't flat.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:29 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
He has been wrong and exaggerated a shite ton. He's a very smart nutcase who only poses theories with zero evidence.
Clearly, you don't know his work. Graham and others reject the conventional claims for many archaeological sites because they have shown that there are no testable, provable results which come close to replicating what the "respectable" archaeologists say must be true.
And while Graham does, on occasion, connect some pretty " out there " dots, he does so as mere speculation, not declarative statements of fact.
quote:
But conspiracy theorists love him.
A term which has since lost almost off of its meaning. Anyone who doesn't bend the knee to dogmatic convention is branded a conspiracist.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:31 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Let me get this straight, IF aliens exist and traveled from other universes, they didn't have the tech to built this? You have a loose wire somewhere
Show me the aliens.
You have taco missing on your combo plate, guy.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:31 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
BayouBlitz
You're not qualified to place a port-o-john. Grown-ups are talking. Go eat your crayons.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:35 pm to lake chuck fan
There are plenty of people who would debate him.
So, there's a YouTube who has videos showing Hancock is full of shite. You'll have to search.
The guy found a speech where Hancock claimed waters rose several feet "literally overnight" causing mass migration of man.
The actual science saw sea levels rise less than 3" over thousands of years.
But yeah. Hancock is reputable. Lol.
So, there's a YouTube who has videos showing Hancock is full of shite. You'll have to search.
The guy found a speech where Hancock claimed waters rose several feet "literally overnight" causing mass migration of man.
The actual science saw sea levels rise less than 3" over thousands of years.
But yeah. Hancock is reputable. Lol.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:42 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
The actual science saw sea levels rise less than 3" over thousands of years.
But I ... want ... to ... believe
Dunno why right wingers get so hung up on giants and ancient aliens and all that stuff.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:04 pm to blueboy
quote:
The Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest, Romania is the heaviest building in the world.
I should have said "among the heaviest".
My apologies.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:09 pm to Jake88
quote:
They wouldn't have built something so flawed
Please tell us how it's flawed....you know, even though we don't know what it is yet.
Quit being an idiot look at me poster. Nothing is known
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:19 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Simply put, human beings of that time, did not have the ability to go build infrastructure TWO MILES below the Earth's surface.
So either aliens did it or it’s fake. Judges?
quote:
It’s fake
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:20 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:Iwas talking about the pyramid itself.
Please tell us how it's flawed....you know, even though we don't know what it is yet
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:20 pm to Penrod
quote:
It’s fake
I'mma go out on a limb and say it's fake
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:34 pm to theballguy
quote:
I'mma go out on a limb and say it's fake
No clue. The group that did it seems like legit pros, using accepted technology grouped together to gain results.
I saw where they are doing a 4 hr presentation to all peers.
Career suicide if faking any or all of it. I sure don't see an angle where faking would benefit them in any way.
After 100s of years of trying, there still is no valid proven explanation on how the above surface pyramids were built and with precision achieved.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:35 pm to Jake88
quote:
Iwas talking about the pyramid itself
The pyramid is flawed? In what way? I'm not up to a speed on the structure at all
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:37 pm to ChatGPT of LA
There are articles on it.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:39 pm to Jake88
quote:
There are articles on it.
Usually a good time to link one
Page 11 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News