- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/31/22 at 10:23 pm to omegaman66
quote:
They had fake ballots ready to go when needed.
The claim here i believe is they're tracking phones to ballot boxes over the course of a month.
In order to get the exact ratio needed and it has to be exact as that's the biggest part of Frank's claim they would need to know as they placed the ballots what the count was they were adjusting to get it into the exact algorithm predicted values.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 12:35 am to oklahogjr
That didn’t make any sense.
They obtained geo location data from cell phone providers for the timeframe that the ballot boxes were out. Then applied very simple programming to analyze the data and cross reference any numbers that were in proximity to more than one ballot box yielding the phone numbers of the culprits. Then cross reference the time these ballot traffickers were there with surveillance video time stamps. Pretty straight forward - getting the data is the key - looks like they had that all set up ahead of time.
I seem to recall some quotes in reference to this:
They obtained geo location data from cell phone providers for the timeframe that the ballot boxes were out. Then applied very simple programming to analyze the data and cross reference any numbers that were in proximity to more than one ballot box yielding the phone numbers of the culprits. Then cross reference the time these ballot traffickers were there with surveillance video time stamps. Pretty straight forward - getting the data is the key - looks like they had that all set up ahead of time.
I seem to recall some quotes in reference to this:
quote:
We have it all
quote:
We caught them all
Posted on 2/1/22 at 6:41 am to cajunangelle
Truth.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 6:49 am to GumboPot
quote:
Right. Big nothing burger.
So lets watch it. Nothing to worry about, right?
Isn't it hilarious how the usual suspects rush to any thread started regarding the cheating?
Posted on 2/1/22 at 7:23 am to oklahogjr
quote:"they cant prove it PRECISELY."
The claim here i believe is..
"there is no evidence"
"cell phones meh"
"we can cheat like hell anyway"
"it is the only way our crooked failed side could ever 'win'"
"I do not care if we violate the civil rights of TENS of MILLIONS of Americans"
"dindu nuffin"
Posted on 2/1/22 at 7:43 am to cajunangelle
What would be the primary purpose of inflating C19 numbers?
Who benefits the most?
Pro-America v Anti-America.
Infiltration.
All assets deployed.
Election not virus.
Q
Who benefits the most?
Pro-America v Anti-America.
Infiltration.
All assets deployed.
Election not virus.
Q
Posted on 2/1/22 at 7:50 am to cajunangelle
Holy shite
Posted on 2/1/22 at 8:11 am to burke985
This needs to be spread like wildfire. Post on all social media constantly.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 8:33 am to Kjnstkmn
It has to be done this way because the DOJ and these local DA's are corrupted and will protect these people for the crimes they committed.
The entire problem is we have a law enforcement and judicial system that is okay with election fraud this one time, because it was Trump. So in this one election there is no where for the victims of election fraud to turn.
At this point there is nothing to do except, show the crime on video and show the evidence to the public and force law enforcement to either ignore it, obfuscate, or defended it.
The goal at this point is to expose the corruption so that next time they know we are watching and election fraud is more difficult.
The entire problem is we have a law enforcement and judicial system that is okay with election fraud this one time, because it was Trump. So in this one election there is no where for the victims of election fraud to turn.
At this point there is nothing to do except, show the crime on video and show the evidence to the public and force law enforcement to either ignore it, obfuscate, or defended it.
The goal at this point is to expose the corruption so that next time they know we are watching and election fraud is more difficult.
This post was edited on 2/1/22 at 8:36 am
Posted on 2/1/22 at 8:49 am to oklahogjr
quote:
So how did they know the exact counts to stuff with at the point where they stuffed
You sure do ask a lot of questions for a guy who pretends be an expert on the subject. There are many theories but access to online voter rolls is one main way.
quote:
Was this stuffing done post or mid counting?
All of the above.
quote:
How did they get that many ready in time between when they knew the totals they were targeting and the count they had to change?
Mail in ballots. They had them in had for weeks if not months.
But, none of your questions directly address Dr. Frank's theory. How the ballots were stuffed is not important.
You've wandered off on a tangent hiding from your original statement.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 8:54 am to oklahogjr
quote:
The claim here i believe is they're tracking phones to ballot boxes over the course of a month.
In order to get the exact ratio needed and it has to be exact as that's the biggest part of Frank's claim they would need to know as they placed the ballots what the count was they were adjusting to get it into the exact algorithm predicted values.
No. All votes (whether stuffed via the mules or legitimate votes) would need to be monitored from a results perspective in order to identify how many votes would need to be added to get Biden to victory. If, at 9:00 pm you need a million votes, you start injecting a million votes. You don't do it at one place for obvious reasons. You spread it out everywhere. In order to do that, you have to have eligible voters who aren't likely to vote.
You are confused.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 10:20 am to moneyg
quote:
No. All votes (whether stuffed via the mules or legitimate votes) would need to be monitored from a results perspective in order to identify how many votes would need to be added to get Biden to victory. If, at 9:00 pm you need a million votes, you start injecting a million votes. You don't do it at one place for obvious reasons. You spread it out everywhere. In order to do that, you have to have eligible voters who aren't likely to vote.
You are confused.
Gotcha so they were counting the vote. Then they got exact numbers. Put some more ballots in a drop box. Then went out ran collection after they counted , then counted again, then the numbers came out? Is this your claim?
Or is the claim that during the window listed in the OP prior to counting there were traffickers stuffing ballots into boxes that were then counted normally?
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:12 am to cajunangelle
As of this post there are 7 heads of sheep (the downvotes) who believe that everything we witnessed on election night was on the up & up.
This will prove that we are not ignorant theorists that cannot accept reality. This will prove that Joe Biden was as popular as a case of herpes and that the Democrats will go to any lengths to rig an election.
GO TRUMP, IN 2024!
This will prove that we are not ignorant theorists that cannot accept reality. This will prove that Joe Biden was as popular as a case of herpes and that the Democrats will go to any lengths to rig an election.
GO TRUMP, IN 2024!
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:23 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Gotcha so they were counting the vote. Then they got exact numbers. Put some more ballots in a drop box. Then went out ran collection after they counted , then counted again, then the numbers came out? Is this your claim?
No. Only a retard would come to that conclusion. This shows that you either aren't capable of understanding, or that you are pretending you don't understand. I certainly didn't suggest something so stupid. Dr. Frank didn't suggest that. Only you.
Illegal ballot harvesting and vote injection via other means are not mutually exclusive.
The way to steal the election was the injection of enough votes to do so. The way to hide the steal is to limit the injection as much as possible and spread it out.
Here, you see illegal ballot harvesting. It's clearly illegal. There is physical evidence showing it. And, you choose to ignore it.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:27 am to Lutcher Lad
We're going on a year plus st this point and we don't have more than s bunch of half baked shite thrown at the wall still.
It was Chinese hackers, or was it ballot mules, or was it the German server the seal team recovered? Was it the Italian testimony story maybe?
And what about the 100% smoking gun packets Lindell had in his back pocket. Still wishing Dennis Montgomery a speedy recovery so we can get a look at those totally legit Chinese packets. Anyway now supreme court is gonna meet and overturn this thing at their behest.
How about the cyber ninjas? Who now refuse to disclose anything or turn over anything else to the senate other than a half baked report that was torn apart and totally useless. They basically just didn't know what they were doing and paid themselves quite well, leaving a shell company and attempting to dodge accountability.
It was Chinese hackers, or was it ballot mules, or was it the German server the seal team recovered? Was it the Italian testimony story maybe?
And what about the 100% smoking gun packets Lindell had in his back pocket. Still wishing Dennis Montgomery a speedy recovery so we can get a look at those totally legit Chinese packets. Anyway now supreme court is gonna meet and overturn this thing at their behest.
How about the cyber ninjas? Who now refuse to disclose anything or turn over anything else to the senate other than a half baked report that was torn apart and totally useless. They basically just didn't know what they were doing and paid themselves quite well, leaving a shell company and attempting to dodge accountability.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:31 am to oklahogjr
oklahogjr - I don't follow the voting thing closely. Tell me, is this part true?
"Here, you see illegal ballot harvesting. It's clearly illegal. There is physical evidence showing it."
"Here, you see illegal ballot harvesting. It's clearly illegal. There is physical evidence showing it."
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:32 am to moneyg
quote:
moneyg
So are these totally separate efforts to steal the vote then?
Democrats did all this harvesting and depositing of votes only to then have hackers log in and flip the votes?
I'm very confused on how you think the election was stolen by both teams here differently.
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:35 am to oklahogjr
How is this throwing things at a wall? We have documented ballot box stuffing. In what world is that OK. Why does it matter what other theories have been promulgated to explain a result that is, TO ANYONE PAYING ATTENTION, unexplainable?
Posted on 2/1/22 at 11:35 am to oklahogjr
If your effort in this thread is to look like a willfully ignorant dipshit that doesn't give two fricks about fair and honest elections then congrats.
You hit it out of the park.
You hit it out of the park.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News