- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:02 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
They apparently and inexplicably want the lawsuits. The administration goes out of its way to facilitate them.
She shouldn’t have worn that skirt.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:03 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
She shouldn’t have worn that skirt.
Nonsense.
This administration does things on purpose that they know will get hung up in court, because they want to use the court decisions for political reasons.
It gums up the agenda, but damnit if they can’t fundraise off it.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:07 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Nonsense. This administration does things on purpose that they know will get hung up in court
We get it. You think being provocative is “asking for it.”
What percentage of the 220 suits do you think they were asking for?
What percentage of women wearing short skirts do you think were asking for it?
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
What percentage of the 220 suits do you think they were asking for?
No idea. I know that the most high-profile ones were entirely avoidable, though. There will always be lawsuits over executive actions. Giving liberal judges avenues to grant injunctions that are facially legal is a choice---either a choice to not care, or a choice to do it on purpose.
The El Salvador "Maryland man" case is a prime example. The administration chose to do it that way for reasons passing understanding. It wouldn't have been difficult to just deport him through ordinary channels. But now it gums up the agenda because the administration shoots from the hip all the time. Pragmatism isn't bad.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:12 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No idea. I know that the most high-profile ones were entirely avoidable, though.
Entirely avoidable. She should have worn pants.
quote:
The El Salvador "Maryland man" case is a prime example. The administration chose to do it that way for reasons passing understanding.
Chose to do what? It was an error. Do you know how many of those occur with the insane amount of illegals that are present. Hundreds of mistakes are made yearly.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:12 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You think being provocative is “asking for it.”
It is pretty much the definition of provocative, so yes, I do.
But everything Trump does is half-baked, so I am not surprised.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:13 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Entirely avoidable. She should have worn pants.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:14 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
You think being provocative is “asking for it.” It is pretty much the definition of provocative, so yes, I do.
Your line of thinking is the exact same as a rapist. Scary.
quote:
But everything Trump does is half-baked, so I am not surprised.
About as much hyperbole as me calling you a rapist.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:17 pm to Indefatigable
Beautiful. My work here is done. 
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:29 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Indefatigable
If you were really bored you would not have made so many posts in this thread.
You people are dunces.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:30 pm to Jbird
quote:
John Coughenour
Politics aside, he had some pretty good songs.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:30 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
If you were really bored you would not have made so many posts in this thread.
You people are dunces.
I'm not bored on the topic. I am bored with the other poster's lazy attempts to shoehorn rape into the issue constantly, and his lack of substance or knowledge of anything that is the subject of the thread.
Surface level soundbites are lazy and generally indicative of someone who is either ignorant or unintelligent.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:40 pm to Jbird
quote:
There is a huge amount of what they are currently doing that they probably could have achieved lawfully, but they have crashed through any of the existing legal guardrails in an attempt to do everything, everywhere, all at once.
Everything the Trump admin is doing is being done legally.
The ones filing lawsuits, and the ones issuing injunctions, are the ones operating illegally.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:05 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Everything the Trump admin is doing is being done legally.
As a Trump supporter, I would say MANY things are being done illegally, but---hopefully---all of it will ultimately be pronounced Constitutional by the Supremes.
Many of the employment actions seem DESIGNED to violate the laws as written. I think (and hope) that many of those laws restricting the president's power over employment actions in the Executive Branch are unconstitutionally infringements on the Executive by the Legislative Branch.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:06 pm to TBoy
quote:
Perhaps we can start here and work our way back:
quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
The guy who authored the amendment said it wasn't meant to give citizenship to the babies of illegals. That's cut and dry. Your intentional misinterpretation of the amendment doesn't make Trump's EO illegal.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:09 pm to TBoy
quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
Who filed this particular law suit and, for whom?
quote:
Perhaps we can start here and work our way back:
Go for it low t.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:11 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
The guy who authored the amendment said it wasn't meant to give citizenship to the babies of illegals. That's cut and dry. Your intentional misinterpretation of the amendment doesn't make Trump's EO illegal.
low t knows this, he's a pretzel.
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:17 pm to TBoy
Ok, let’s play that game. Name the laws that have been broken?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News