- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4karens claims not to see or hear anything about hero Obama
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:20 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:20 am to 4cubbies
You admit Obama allowed “Russiagate” to hang over the election results and undermine Trump with the help of the media who jumped on the narrative and didn’t let go, further destroying the American discourse.
The fact this doesn’t bother you is reprehensible
The fact this doesn’t bother you is reprehensible
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 9:22 am
0
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:35 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Watergate reporting started as a low-priority, small notice of a break-in. It took a little while to connect the dots.
Be patient.
Here is an article in National Review by a reporter who wrote a book alleging that the Obama Administration colluded with the Clinton campaign about Russis, Russia, Russia.
quote:
Last Friday, DNI Gabbard breathlessly released a slew of email communications between intelligence officials that showed what we have already known for years — indeed, what was established by a yearslong probe conducted by John Durham, a special counsel appointed by the Justice Department in the first Trump administration precisely to investigate the fabrication of a Trump-Russia collusion narrative. To wit: Despite the absence of evidence that Russian machinations had any substantive impact on the 2016 election, the Obama-era intelligence services, including the FBI, CIA, and ODNI, egged on by the White House, generated an intelligence community assessment (ICA) to highlight Russia’s inconsequential interference in that election. The ICA stressed that Vladimir Putin’s regime was trying to damage Hillary Clinton, and it speculated that Putin “aspired” to help Donald Trump.
quote:
In 2018, as Russiagate was unfolding (and while Gabbard was a progressive Democratic congresswoman planning what turned out to be a failed 2020 bid for the party’s nomination), I wrote a book about it, Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. There have been multiple extensive investigations and government reports since then, but what I argued in the book is that the real collusion was between the Clinton campaign and Obama administration officials to put the government’s law enforcement and intelligence apparatus in the service of Democratic Party objectives. No new light is shed on this episode by Gabbard’s email disclosures last Friday, which, unsurprisingly, were accompanied by an overwrought and misleading press release rather than an analytical report. Perhaps that is because Gabbard’s intelligence community peer, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, did issue an analytical report just a few days earlier that contradicts Gabbard’s implication that there was no evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
quote:
In part three, in particular, I contended that the Trump administration’s decision to revive this episode, while titillating for the MAGA political base, was self-sabotage. That is mainly because, after months of scrutiny, the Trump CIA has reaffirmed the ICA’s conclusions that (1) Russia sought to interfere in the 2016 election and (2) did so in order to denigrate Hillary Clinton — i.e., Kremlin strongman Vladimir Putin anticipated that Clinton would be elected and hoped to make her a less effective president, which would be in Russia’s interest as America’s geopolitical rival. The public position of President Trump and his most ardent supporters — the position that Gabbard reiterates — is that Russiagate was a total hoax, a complete fabrication by Democrats, without a shred of truth to it, concocted to undermine his presidency. This has always been a foolish stance. Russia habitually tries to influence American politics, including electoral politics, just as our government has for decades intruded in the politics of the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia. (In fact, the Obama administration’s support of the revolt that ousted Ukraine’s democratically elected, pro-Russian regime in 2013–14 motivated both Putin’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2016 denigration of Clinton, Obama’s former secretary of state.) Russia’s efforts in this regard, and specifically in 2016, have been laughably ineffective; that doesn’t mean they haven’t happened at all.
National Review (Paywall)
Posted on 7/21/25 at 9:45 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Furthermore the trump admin went on to indict 11 Russian military officers who breached election systems during the election....
Indict....they could indict anyone. I bet they couldnt have proved anything. Because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
You need to check your DOJ Link there Comrade.....it can't be found.
This post was edited on 7/21/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:05 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m under the impression that Obama allowed claims of Russian election interference to be claimed in the two months he was president after the election.
The traitor obama was involved in this months before election day.
It is beginning to look like
traitor obama was involved in the planning.
Nixon was forced to resign over much less involvement in Watergate.
What makes libtards unable to call out criminality in fellow libtards?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:20 am to geoag58
quote:
What makes libtards unable to call out criminality in fellow libtards?
quote:
libtards
quote:
tards
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:22 am to antibarner
Link is fixed.
You clearly don't understand our legal system
quote:
Indict....they could indict anyone. I bet they couldnt have proved anything. Because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
You clearly don't understand our legal system
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:27 am to 4cubbies
"Centuries-long brutalization of black Americans "....there it is.
Deflection, deflection, deflect
Deflection, deflection, deflect
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:28 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Yes. Terrified. Some other poster might devote another thread to me being unconcerned with these emails.
As I said. I don’t think you are smart enough to know what the accusations are, but you are clearly worried about it.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:36 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Truth social- just the facts...lol
As opposed to? What "factual" news sources are you relying on? Pussy.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:37 am to Houag80
But he ain't Black Yeezus!
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:38 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m under the impression that Obama allowed claims of Russian election interference to be claimed in the two months he was president after the election. Because Obama did not tell people to hush about Russia, Trump was sworn in on January 20, 2017. And now, years later, people are saying Obama committed treason and staged a coup.
JFC... You are absolutely fricking retarded.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:39 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Ouch. That cuts deep, y’all.
We know.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:40 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Another person responding with “nuh uh lol you’re dumb” while refusing to state anything relevant.
You are a retard.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:41 am to 4cubbies
quote:
When have I ever posted praise or support for Obama?
Posting here is truly like entering an alternate universe.
Maybe you should GTFO and stay on Reddit and DU, in your blue bubble of emotions-based politics.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:
quote:
Based on your posts over the years, you support everything the wacko, corrupt left does.
I’ve literally never posted anything supporting Obama. L
So, you don't like Obama?
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:44 am to Houag80
quote:
"Centuries-long brutalization of black Americans "..
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:45 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Posting here is truly like entering an alternate universe.
That’s quite the compliment given your fricked and corrupted sense of reality.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 10:53 am to geoag58
quote:I agree, but NOT until there is smoking gun 'testimony' was Nixon finally caught up in it. Until someone, under oath, points a finger directly at Obama and says, "This was all HIS plan and we were doing as we were told", then Obama is smart to just keep his mouth shut. All the 'allegations' in the world mean nothing until they become charges, so right now, all we have are allegations by people vested in retribution. THAT is how Dems see it, and will continue to see it that way until someone actually goes to jail after being convicted and someone afraid of jail spills the beans.
Nixon was forced to resign over much less involvement in Watergate.
Posted on 7/21/25 at 11:00 am to 4cubbies
quote:
But the centuries-long brutalization of black Americans would never cause them to act out.
There’s that racist white savior complex. That didn’t take long
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News