- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Accused Assassin Captured in Minnesota
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:23 am to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:23 am to IvoryBillMatt
You defending Walz and you hating ppl who support Trump means you’re a leftist wacko like Walz.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:23 am to IvoryBillMatt
Now defending Tampon Tim.
Mask slips again
Mask slips again
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:25 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
You realize how radical Minnesota is? The fact Walz didn’t say anything at the presser and it hasn’t been confirmed that he’s a right wing radical by now is telling he’s likely a leftist.
First and foremost. Walz has to walk back and correct his statements about "bullying" and "fighting" the opposition. I don't know how he corrects it, but he has to retract that nonsense.
Secondly, the Democratic party has to turn away from violence and distance the party from people like Schumer, Walz, Waters, Crockett...
Right now, they're the party of violence and hate.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 7:26 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:25 am to SDVTiger
Nah he voted for Trump 17 times bro but he hates maga supporters. Nutjobs
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:25 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You defending Walz and you hating ppl who support Trump means you’re a leftist wacko like Walz.
quote:
Now defending Tampon Tim.
Mask slips again
This whole saga has been an absolute master class in the dishonest rhetoric behind the echo chamber and partisan brain rot
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Terrible Republican candidates. *ETA: our current governor is still a terrible Republican candidate, but the LA DEMs had nobody beyond JBE.
So why didn’t Mary (or her brother) run? Since Landry was such a terrible Republican candidate, and you love their family so much, they would have easily picked up your vote.
You are going to be awfully thirsty if you have to eat all of the pretzels you are making this morning.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:27 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
So why did this guy live with some fat slob when he was married and his wife was also arrested with firearms?
Some publications say he stayed there while working in the city during the week and commuted home on the weekends. I’m unfamiliar with the mileage from his workplace to home, but it would have to be in the triple digits for me to shack up with that Michael Moore looking Papa John’s worker instead of going home to see my family.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 7:54 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:30 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
So why didn’t Mary (or her brother) run?
They're done. Silly question.
Now, the GOP should be careful of JBE running for Cassidy's Senate seat. He could win that, especially if MAGA is sincere about bloodying Cassidy in the primary. That's the JBE playbook on sliding in at the final election.
quote:
and you love their family so much
wut
quote:
You are going to be awfully thirsty if you have to eat all of the pretzels you are making this morning.
What pretzels? It seems this purported conflict is based in you making shite up (like the above)
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:30 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
couldn't have been a reason for Walz to hire Boelter as a hit man.
I believe most people don't think Walz 'hired' him but rather the guy went after the person who voted against the democrats.
The other names on the supposed hit list could be anything really. He had democrats and abortion clinics in his manifesto (allegedly because I'm not sure if it's been released). He could be making it to look like a 'right wing' guy did this....and took out Hortman out first.
He could also be a 'right wing' nut job that wanted to kill democrats and attack abortion clinics.....
He could also just be a nut job......
Edit to correct her name. My phone autocorrected it to HArtman. I didn't want to seem disrespectful to her.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 7:55 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:30 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Secondly, the Democratic party has to turn away from violence
At the national level?
Sadly, I don’t see that happening.
Remember that ANTIFA and BLM are the foot soldiers of the left.
They can’t decouple from them without their violent extremists turning on them.
They have created a monster.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:No. Sorry.
Your argument counters their claim as to motive.
No. It counters their argument as to his personal politics.
Their argument was this psycho attacked Hortman d/t her recent party "defection" (albeit on one vote).
You've been contorting your arse off to "prove" political motivation of just the opposite ilk.
But given your dodging and denials, here's your chance to clarify, SFP.
Was Boelter's political and/or religious belief foundational to these shootings or not?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Now, the GOP should be careful of JBE running for Cassidy's Senate seat.
According to you, JBE is further right than Cassidy.
Eat your pretzels.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:36 am to NC_Tigah
quote:This unbiased observer has made it abundantly clear in his posts that the motivation of the accused is that he was an Evangelical Christian who opposed abortion and transgenderism. He has provided no proof of this but that has not stopped him from making that assertion.
Was Boelter's political and/or religious belief foundational to these shootings or not?
Hopefully that answered your question.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:39 am to dupergreenie
quote:
I believe most people don't think Walz 'hired' him but rather the guy went after the person who voted against the democrats. The other names on the supposed hit list could be anything really. He had democrats and abortion clinics in his manifesto (allegedly because I'm not sure if it's been released). He could be making it to look like a 'right wing' guy did this....and took out Hartman out first. He could also be a 'right wing' nut job that wanted to kill democrats and attack abortion clinics..... He could also just be a nut job......
Any part of this could be true.
Time will tell.
The only thing to add is that SFP suggesting that the murderer being placed in a position by Walz was meaningless. It is a silly deflection by SFP (or he is being intentionally disingenuous).
It wasn’t like he was placed on some obscure committee.
SFP knows this.
Something is odd about this imho.
Nonetheless, I pray for the families of the victims.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 7:41 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:39 am to Wolfhound45
When you’re friends with the site owner you can act like a complete jackass and stir shite without any consequences.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:41 am to Wolfhound45
Not sure if "Tim Walz" associate is accurate; is more reaching or wishful thinking than anything. That working group is a very minor appointment and had no control, enforcement, or policy powers.
This guy is from the right. I'd prefer the basis not be be religious based. But otherwise, if he was more effective, I think if it was more on a political basis it would be in my mind "fighting fire with fire" against the leftists.
I'd like to see his list. Going after middle-of-road democrats and no activist judges is falling short. The left goes after R leadership, presidents, governors, kids, and cabinet level positions. His list, I assume, and his effectiveness falls way short.
This guy is from the right. I'd prefer the basis not be be religious based. But otherwise, if he was more effective, I think if it was more on a political basis it would be in my mind "fighting fire with fire" against the leftists.
I'd like to see his list. Going after middle-of-road democrats and no activist judges is falling short. The left goes after R leadership, presidents, governors, kids, and cabinet level positions. His list, I assume, and his effectiveness falls way short.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:42 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
You realize how radical Minnesota is? The fact Walz didn’t say anything at the presser and it hasn’t been confirmed that he’s a right wing radical by now is telling he’s likely a leftist.
If Minnesota were THAT radical and the guy were a leftist, don't you think they would have killed him rather than captured him to avoid risking exposure of Walz's diabolical plot?
I know you won't respond to that logically. You simply don't have the ability to reason when it comes to Walz or anybody who opposes Trump.
I apologize for being so harsh with you and responding in kind to your mindless insults of me. You seem really uncomfortable with any uncertainty. My guess is you have to break everything down to good guys and bad guys. So. I have to be a bad guy, because I disagree with you on some things.
The admonition in James 3 against the fire of the tongue is really weighing on me. You're free to think everything that Tim Walz does is bad. You appear to need that.
I will stop frightening you with facts or expecting you to respond rationally. Peace.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:42 am to OysterPoBoy
Watch the wacky left celebrate him like the United Health killer....
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:43 am to TinyTim
quote:
This is what fascism looks like.
That was Covid.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:44 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Their argument was this psycho attacked Hortman d/t her recent party "defection" (albeit on one vote).
...because, they argue, he was a Leftist. You left that part out of their argument
There are 2 pieces of data (not even evidence) arguing he was a Leftist. You just provided one, but ignored the context with which the datapoint keeps being forced into the discussion.
The other datapoint is the appointment (which has been dishonestly turned into "working for", intentionally, for clear reasons I hope I don't have to explain).
quote:
You've been contorting your arse off to "prove" political motivation of just the opposite ilk.
Nope.
I've been consistent using actual evidence to show the statistical unlikelihood that he's a "Leftist" as he's being portrayed in the echo chamber narrative.
quote:
Was Boelter's political and/or religious belief foundational to these shootings or not?
We don't know, for sure.
As more evidence links these shootings to the abortion issue, I imagine that picture will be painted more clearly, though. My guess is the abortion issue is his motivation and that his personal politics of extreme social conservatism were motivators.
What you seem to be confusing is the Evangelical Christian status and its place in the discussion. You keep creating a straw man that I'm using it as evidence of motivation for the shooting, when I am not. I've clearly only used it as evidence of what his personal politics are highly unlikely to be (Leftism).
Popular
Back to top


0






