- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ARBL- Any Republican But Landry
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:24 am to GirthBrooks62
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:24 am to GirthBrooks62
1
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:24 am to boudinman
Having a tough time considering Waguespack after his supporter came on here yesterday promoting the debt limit deal and the endorsement of Graves.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:26 am to BugAC
quote:
I don't think there have been debates yet. I'm sure there were debates when he ran for AG, but as you said, all he wanted to do was talk about crime. Well, ATTORNEY GENERAL's job is almost exclusively about crime
If you define crime as any kind of law that is broken, maybe... but the AG has very, very little to do with the violent and property crime that is causing so many problems. That is almost 100 percent the locals whose job deals with this.
The AG is more about dealing with financial crimes, white collar crimes, election crimes, and some state-level investigative help.
But by far Landry's strongest wins have been in the area of suing federal officials and trying to prevent federal overreach... but only on certain topics.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:26 am to BugAC
quote:He also wasted taxpayer dollars being a jerk to JBE on a variety of issues just to be difficult. Had to be settled in the courts and JBE won repeatedly. That’s spiteful politics. And I’m not a JBE fan.
Meh, his time as AG was impressive. He filed multiple lawsuits against the federal government and won several Supreme Court cases against the Biden administration.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:27 am to blueboy
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:27 am to moneyg
quote:
Having a tough time considering Waguespack after his supporter came on here yesterday promoting the debt limit deal and the endorsement of Graves.
Waguespack is going to get you "effective" government that will serve to improve the business climate.
He's not likely to cut spending or care much about red-meat social issues.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:28 am to spidermans_uncle
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:29 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
If you define crime as any kind of law that is broken
I do.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:29 am to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:31 am to boudinman
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 8:41 am
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:32 am to XanJohn
We need an antiestablishment candidate that’s going to put Louisiana First. We need fresh blood. Demand Xan.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:32 am to ragincajun03
Here is where we are.
On one hand, you have Landry, who cares very much about social issues and red-meat issues, but (so far) has shown little interest in fixing the tax, educational, and governance structural issues that are holding our state back.
On the other hand, you have Waguespack/Nelson/Schroder/Hewitt, who all seem to have ideas on how address the tax, educational, and governance structure issues, but don't really seem all that concerned / worried about social / red-meat issues.
So as our next governor, do we want a technocrat who will attempt to fix a lot of our longstanding issues, or do we want a firebrand who will ensure we are at the forefront of fighting back against federal social liberalism, and making sure the trannies are kept in their place?
Cause it sure doesn't seem like we have any candidates who want to do both.
On one hand, you have Landry, who cares very much about social issues and red-meat issues, but (so far) has shown little interest in fixing the tax, educational, and governance structural issues that are holding our state back.
On the other hand, you have Waguespack/Nelson/Schroder/Hewitt, who all seem to have ideas on how address the tax, educational, and governance structure issues, but don't really seem all that concerned / worried about social / red-meat issues.
So as our next governor, do we want a technocrat who will attempt to fix a lot of our longstanding issues, or do we want a firebrand who will ensure we are at the forefront of fighting back against federal social liberalism, and making sure the trannies are kept in their place?
Cause it sure doesn't seem like we have any candidates who want to do both.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:32 am to LSUAngelHere1
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 8:41 am
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:33 am to BugAC
quote:
I do
That's fair.
But I do think we need to have discussion about what role, if any, the state plays in violent and property crime prevention / punishment.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:34 am to BugAC
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 8:41 am
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:36 am to XanJohn
quote:
Louisiana First!
Cool!
But the three things you say...
quote:
I’m pro-Trump, Pro-Constitution and support Tucker Carlson!
None of them have to do with putting Louisiana First.
Tell me you are pro-reforming our tax system, pro-getting a new state constiutiton, and support diversifying our economy, and let's talk.
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:36 am to Bunta
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 8:42 am
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:36 am to XanJohn
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:39 am to Epaminondas
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/1/23 at 8:43 am
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:40 am to XanJohn
quote:
XanJohn
Give us some policies or positions you hold. Not "pro-Trump". That didn't work out well for Rispone.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News