Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us As I get older I start to wonder if Capitalism is really the best approach | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: As I get older I start to wonder if Capitalism is really the best approach

Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
101560 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Look how China is shielded from any blame for anything it is doing? Because US interests and profits.


Peoples fault for not voting for better politicians that aren’t in big corporations pocket

quote:

Look at how many tub of lard Americans are waddling around? Because we have to maximize profits by selling garbage food with corn syrup, etc.


Governments fault for changing the food pyramid and forcing companies to remove natural fats from food, and it got replaced with sugar. Also technology has led to more sedentary lifestyles. But communism will starve you, so there’s that I guess.

quote:

Hey do you like that stand of 200 year old hardwoods? Tough shite we are going to flatten them and build low quality apartments that will turn to trash soon


Govt does this too when they build infrastructure. There are always trade offs, and govt does a decent job protecting important natural habitats and forests without being socialist.

Capitalism isn’t perfect, but it’s the best we have got. The US isn’t really true capitalist anymore anyways. Access to capital is too restricted to the regular startup business and regulations are burdensome to the point it stifles competition and protects big corporations
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69842 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 1:52 pm to
Every philosophy has a different perspective on what society looks like without the rule of law.

Libertarians see anarcho-capitalism, progressives see theocratic despots, evangelicals debaucherous hedonism, statists chaotic anarchy, nationalists see ethnic tribal warfare, etc.

The reality is that no matter what system of economics one follows, with either too much or too little rule of law, the end result is some form of, essentially, organized crime where a small powerful and well-armed elite control resources and fight amongst each other for control. The rules don’t apply to them.

I see the rule of law as somewhat of a spectrum. It’s all about dialing it in and maintaining it in just the right range so that property rights are protected (thus people don’t have to spend nearly all of their excess resources on securing their resources), people feel reasonably safe going about their days and doing business, people have the ability to easily start their own businesses, access capital, develop their property, and manufacture and sell their own goods, ensure inventors have the rights to their inventions, etc.

The reality is that government can become corrupted and function just like the despotic organized criminals that tend to take hold in places with no rule of law. As such, it is up to the people to hold government accountable and constantly maintain leverage over their governments to keep them in that tolerable range.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

weagle99


The longer I live, the more conflicted I have become on this issue

For me there is corrupt capitalism (cult of productivity at all costs) and balanced capitalism (holistic view of a capitalistic system). When favoring the latter, those in the former label you as a socialist or communist...

I have a sense that what is holding back the UAP issues and civilzation changing technologies is corrupt capitalism/power
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 3:52 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

What if I'm not a selfish a-hole and am motivated by a higher ideal (the Nation,
God, morality) rather than can I make a buck



You don't. You just don't understand capitalism.

Selfish assholes choose socialism because they're afraid of people who are more capable than they. Unless you're a world class moron, you'll find socialistic economies aren't more "altruistic" (lolol at people who believe they are altruistic through politics) and pollute, starve people and kill at a higher rate than capitalistic nations.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 2:07 pm
Posted by Arch of Titus
Member since Oct 2022
35 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Selfish assholes choose socialism because they're afraid of people who are more capable than they.


Seems to me the people promoting open borders, LGBT nonsense, fund all elections, etc are the billionaires.
Posted by 1loyalbamafan
alabama
Member since Mar 2015
3946 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:06 pm to
Monoplies are hurting capitalism and crooked lobbiests.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Seems to me the people promoting open borders, LGBT nonsense, fund all elections, etc are the billionaires.


ESG and technocracy is your future.

People terrified of their own personal abilities choose socialism. Technocracy is the modern workaround.

You're worried about the technocrats and technocracy is a form of socialism.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137222 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

As I get older I start to wonder if Capitalism is really the best approach
You understand capitalism and personal freedom go hand-in-hand?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

the more conflicted I have become on this issue


So you prefer more "fairness," and less freedom.

I suspect most "socialists" just really want the government to protect the wealth they have. Stupid frickers.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 2:19 pm
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:27 pm to
It definitely produces bad incentives when it comes to certain things, especially, news media and social media.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

You understand capitalism and personal freedom go hand-in-hand?


I wonder what parts of the economy these new found socialists are willing to hand over to the Federal Govt?\

Start with the legal profession. I guarantee you minds will change immediately.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 2:32 pm
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


As I get older I start to wonder if...
you are not old enough yet if that is your question
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23692 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:35 pm to
Go somewhere without capitalism and then come back and explain how great everything was. I'll wait.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

you are not old enough yet if that is your question


Wealthy people love socialism. It keeps the riff raff away, and protects their wealth (they believe)

What they really love is crony capitalism, the middle class is the enemy.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34959 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

What if I'm not a selfish a-hole and am motivated by a higher ideal (the Nation,
God, morality) rather than can I make a buck


Hopefully you aren't. You can give to charity or just help them yourself. It's not the government's responsibility to support its citizens.

There is a role for a government to provide a temporary safety net, but we have generations of people living on the government dole. People who have never and will never have a job.

True capitalism cannot exist in that environment.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 2:43 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

For capitalism to work, you have to be willing to let people starve in the streets. Unfortunately, our government is not willing to do that.


So what are we left with? Some bastardized system that will be here for the remainder of our lives?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

The Founders knew this from history and tried to hinder the State as much as possible.


And I say they failed given where we are today.

Maybe they should have included a clear cut secession escape hatch. I dunno.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 3:49 pm to
We haven't had capitalism for decades. Its a mixed system.

What system would you prefer? You willing to trade more freedom for more government control?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

the Tailor's justification


I’m not familiar with this, can you explain or link? Thanks.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 3:53 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 10/17/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

What system would you prefer?


I honestly don’t know.

quote:

You willing to trade more freedom for more government control?


I don’t want more government.

At the same time I increasingly find the short sightedness of our profit driven society to be abhorrent, particularly with regards to natural and heritage resources.

I’m conflicted.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram