Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Civil War Official Trailer | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Civil War Official Trailer

Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:26 pm to
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23083 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Most movies made about the civil war are historically wrong They portray white folks as bad when they should e portraying democrats as bad


quote:

Go back and watch the trailer. If you did already, go back and watch it again


I admit to not watching the trailer.

Now that I have, Id still make the comment that democrats are bad

Seriously, Texas teaming up with California?

Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27241 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:30 pm to
People are still hiring Kirsten Dunst?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
64333 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:30 pm to
Wow, Kiki is looking pretty old.

Looks gay.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
39369 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Can't tell if there's an agenda there or not


There will be.
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 2:34 pm
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23083 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Love the comment “Texas and California working together…obvious fiction”


as is 3rd term President
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
6763 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:39 pm to
There's definitely an agenda. They're framing it as armies fighting because they want people to believe that's what it would look like. It won't. It will be individuals and small independent groups attacking targets anywhere and everywhere at any time. It's going to look more like what we've got right now, only much more of it and it's going to be going both ways.

The next American Civil War will look more like an actual insurrection / insurgency that's going to look like uncoordinated chaos. It won't be though. Social Media will send out the signals. Those that want to see them will. Those that don't will just wonder why there's so much crime. Any groups that form will be infiltrated or formed as bait so the way this actually plays out is neighbors shooting neighbors simply for who they work for or have said in the past. It's going to be nightmarish. Hell on earth.

We come out the other end fractured and split into smaller countries.

That's by design.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81240 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Very revealing.


Isn't it?

IN 1860 one country divided into two countries and had a conventional war.

Calling that a "civil" war is a misnomer.

We all know that an actual civil war is a neighborhood to neighborhood affair within a single country, like Sarajevo and Lebanon.
Posted by FCarole
Down da bayou
Member since Nov 2021
229 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

obvious fiction”


Well, Ron Swanson is the president, so...
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25377 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

as is 3rd term President


This is what probably led to

quote:

Texas and California working together


Texas and California are the two controlling states of the USA and have a common interest to retain that power. They differ vastly on many things, but both agree they are not to be controlled by outside forces. Where the Fed is too much for Texas, it is not enough for California. Both states want to do it their way.

There could be a scenario where other US states banded together to weaken the stronger states (changing Constitution and Presidential powers), that made enemies become allies. The Southwest corridor could be under direct threat by Northeast actions, thus the alliance.

Southern States would fall in with Texas easily, however Florida very well could have their own motives for control of the Eastern seaboard.
Posted by FCarole
Down da bayou
Member since Nov 2021
229 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:54 pm to
Here's the wild thing... Ron Ulysses Swanson, after running a parks and recreation department, was triggered by the firing of his co-worker, Leslie Knope. He decided his revenge would be to stay in politics and ultimately run for president as a Libertarian.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
29795 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:59 pm to
I have -sincerely- not been interested in any movies in so long I am truly unplugged.

They just dropped another end of the worlder by the Obamas. Now a civil war movie?

I'm 100% disinterested in continuing -any- messaging I may pick up unwittingly along the way. Even in the movies you catch 100% of their intent, you still have to contend with memory being fluid... over time, it adds up to a picture THEY are drawing for me.

There are worse things to have to lose than shitty entertainment.
Posted by NCaddoTigerfan
Member since Aug 2021
710 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:02 pm to
It will be tough to beat the 81 million people that voted for Biden……
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39520 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

the premise an actual civil war (we've never had one) or another conventional war between 2 countries like 1860?





Cope
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Isn't it?

IN 1860 one country divided into two countries and had a conventional war.

Calling that a "civil" war is a misnomer.


No, that's what it was and is understood as such by anyone who knows history and isn't some idiot that refers to it as the "War of Northern Aggression" or bleats about how it was not about slavery.

It's just too rich that you have that Camus quote and misuse words and misrepresent articles on the reg.
Posted by FLTech
Member since Sep 2017
26690 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:07 pm to
Crazy how all of the movies coming out is about crazy shite like this and USA getting nuked, etc.

They are grooming us to be ready when it all happens
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
4639 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

About what specifically?


This uninformed comment,
"Looks incredibly stupid. Especially F-22s flying under 5000 feet"
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17785 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Especially Texas and California working together. The biggest kicker is seeing conventional military forces fighting each other.


The least believable part is President Swanson.

Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
76249 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:15 pm to
The predictive train rolls on, I see. First Leave the World Behind lays out the comms blackout scenario, now this.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
76249 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

100% everyone who buys tickets to that movie will be on a watch list.

What's one more list?
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
39897 posts
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

This uninformed comment, "Looks incredibly stupid. Especially F-22s flying under 5000 feet"



What is uninformed about it?

That’s a very strange flight profile for an aircraft like the F-22. Flying that low in a contested environment would be nightmarish when facing MANPADS against a first-rate supplied military. The F-22’s mission package is designed for high altitude command and control and BVR weapons deployment.

There would be no reason to be flying an F-22 casually that low in any circumstance in a war. Not to mention the F-15s alongside it in that video.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram