- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Civil War Official Trailer
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:26 pm to PaperTiger
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:26 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
Most movies made about the civil war are historically wrong They portray white folks as bad when they should e portraying democrats as bad
quote:
Go back and watch the trailer. If you did already, go back and watch it again
I admit to not watching the trailer.
Now that I have, Id still make the comment that democrats are bad
Seriously, Texas teaming up with California?
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:30 pm to ThuperThumpin
People are still hiring Kirsten Dunst?
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:30 pm to ThuperThumpin
Wow, Kiki is looking pretty old.
Looks gay.
Looks gay.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:33 pm to Leto II
quote:
Can't tell if there's an agenda there or not
There will be.
This post was edited on 12/13/23 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:35 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Love the comment “Texas and California working together…obvious fiction”
as is 3rd term President
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:39 pm to Leto II
There's definitely an agenda. They're framing it as armies fighting because they want people to believe that's what it would look like. It won't. It will be individuals and small independent groups attacking targets anywhere and everywhere at any time. It's going to look more like what we've got right now, only much more of it and it's going to be going both ways.
The next American Civil War will look more like an actual insurrection / insurgency that's going to look like uncoordinated chaos. It won't be though. Social Media will send out the signals. Those that want to see them will. Those that don't will just wonder why there's so much crime. Any groups that form will be infiltrated or formed as bait so the way this actually plays out is neighbors shooting neighbors simply for who they work for or have said in the past. It's going to be nightmarish. Hell on earth.
We come out the other end fractured and split into smaller countries.
That's by design.
The next American Civil War will look more like an actual insurrection / insurgency that's going to look like uncoordinated chaos. It won't be though. Social Media will send out the signals. Those that want to see them will. Those that don't will just wonder why there's so much crime. Any groups that form will be infiltrated or formed as bait so the way this actually plays out is neighbors shooting neighbors simply for who they work for or have said in the past. It's going to be nightmarish. Hell on earth.
We come out the other end fractured and split into smaller countries.
That's by design.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:44 pm to cwill
quote:
Very revealing.
Isn't it?
IN 1860 one country divided into two countries and had a conventional war.
Calling that a "civil" war is a misnomer.
We all know that an actual civil war is a neighborhood to neighborhood affair within a single country, like Sarajevo and Lebanon.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:48 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
obvious fiction”
Well, Ron Swanson is the president, so...
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:51 pm to Loserman
quote:
as is 3rd term President
This is what probably led to
quote:
Texas and California working together
Texas and California are the two controlling states of the USA and have a common interest to retain that power. They differ vastly on many things, but both agree they are not to be controlled by outside forces. Where the Fed is too much for Texas, it is not enough for California. Both states want to do it their way.
There could be a scenario where other US states banded together to weaken the stronger states (changing Constitution and Presidential powers), that made enemies become allies. The Southwest corridor could be under direct threat by Northeast actions, thus the alliance.
Southern States would fall in with Texas easily, however Florida very well could have their own motives for control of the Eastern seaboard.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:54 pm to Loserman
Here's the wild thing... Ron Ulysses Swanson, after running a parks and recreation department, was triggered by the firing of his co-worker, Leslie Knope. He decided his revenge would be to stay in politics and ultimately run for president as a Libertarian.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 2:59 pm to ThuperThumpin
I have -sincerely- not been interested in any movies in so long I am truly unplugged.
They just dropped another end of the worlder by the Obamas. Now a civil war movie?
I'm 100% disinterested in continuing -any- messaging I may pick up unwittingly along the way. Even in the movies you catch 100% of their intent, you still have to contend with memory being fluid... over time, it adds up to a picture THEY are drawing for me.
There are worse things to have to lose than shitty entertainment.
They just dropped another end of the worlder by the Obamas. Now a civil war movie?
I'm 100% disinterested in continuing -any- messaging I may pick up unwittingly along the way. Even in the movies you catch 100% of their intent, you still have to contend with memory being fluid... over time, it adds up to a picture THEY are drawing for me.
There are worse things to have to lose than shitty entertainment.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:02 pm to Captain Rumbeard
It will be tough to beat the 81 million people that voted for Biden……
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:05 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
the premise an actual civil war (we've never had one) or another conventional war between 2 countries like 1860?
Cope
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:07 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Isn't it?
IN 1860 one country divided into two countries and had a conventional war.
Calling that a "civil" war is a misnomer.
No, that's what it was and is understood as such by anyone who knows history and isn't some idiot that refers to it as the "War of Northern Aggression" or bleats about how it was not about slavery.
It's just too rich that you have that Camus quote and misuse words and misrepresent articles on the reg.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:07 pm to ThuperThumpin
Crazy how all of the movies coming out is about crazy shite like this and USA getting nuked, etc.
They are grooming us to be ready when it all happens
They are grooming us to be ready when it all happens
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:08 pm to rmnldr
quote:
About what specifically?
This uninformed comment,
"Looks incredibly stupid. Especially F-22s flying under 5000 feet"
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:10 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Especially Texas and California working together. The biggest kicker is seeing conventional military forces fighting each other.
The least believable part is President Swanson.

Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:15 pm to ThuperThumpin
The predictive train rolls on, I see. First Leave the World Behind lays out the comms blackout scenario, now this.
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:31 pm to Snipe
quote:
100% everyone who buys tickets to that movie will be on a watch list.
What's one more list?
Posted on 12/13/23 at 3:36 pm to Tandemjay
quote:
This uninformed comment, "Looks incredibly stupid. Especially F-22s flying under 5000 feet"
What is uninformed about it?
That’s a very strange flight profile for an aircraft like the F-22. Flying that low in a contested environment would be nightmarish when facing MANPADS against a first-rate supplied military. The F-22’s mission package is designed for high altitude command and control and BVR weapons deployment.
There would be no reason to be flying an F-22 casually that low in any circumstance in a war. Not to mention the F-15s alongside it in that video.
Popular
Back to top


0













