- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Epstein files have begun to be released
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:26 pm to SDVTiger
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:26 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
They are being released and you are still complaining as predicted
SDV, I'm sure you're a great person in real life. It's useless to respond to you, because you will just make up a position for me.
The law that the President signed 30 days ago requires them to be RELEASED today...not to be in the process of RELEASING them today.
The files are a nothing burger. Comply with the law. Move on.
3
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:27 pm to VOLhalla
Also, I've gone through every PDF listed on the DOJs site about this and I don't see any 100 page files that are completely redacted. The closest thing is the masseuse list. It's fully redacted, but it's just seven pages of single line numbered text. Which clearly means it's just the 254 girls he "employed" to frick grown men.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:29 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Are you going to cling to the fricking release data stupidity?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
As is the file marked masseuse's. Know why? Because they're all victims, having been underage.
This is your first response. The only justification for all information to be redacted is if the only information on that document is just victim names and personally identifiable information, which you’ve already conceded is a ridiculous assumption to make in a document that large.
The information in that document that isn’t names/birthdates/hometowns, etc for the victims shouldn’t be redacted
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:30 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The files are a nothing burger
No shite. Its why the Masshole crusade was just stupid
quote:
Comply with the law. Move on.
Again they are being released and you cry like a Karen
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:31 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
Also, I've gone through every PDF listed on the DOJs site about this and I don't see any 100 page files that are completely redacted. The closest thing is the masseuse list. It's fully redacted, but it's just seven pages of single line numbered text. Which clearly means it's just the 254 girls he "employed" to frick grown men.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:32 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Which clearly means it's just the 254 girls he "employed" to frick grown men.
Ed, do you think Epstein DID employ girls to frick other men?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:32 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The files are a nothing burger. Comply with the law. Move on.
If Trump was in these photos you wouldn’t be saying this.
But instead, your Pedo Heroes are there and you could care less.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:33 pm to SDVTiger
Karen is upset the same shite that has happened for decades is sooooo upsetting.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Ed, do you think Epstein DID employ girls to frick other men?
We frickin know he did because it's been sworn to in court and a goddamn prince has already lost his titles over this shite - hopefully with more to come for that bastard too.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:34 pm to Jbird
quote:
Are you going to cling to the fricking release data stupidity?
Release DATE? Yes. This isn't moral. It's political. I think it looks bad to not comply with your own law.
Probably won't change any minds re midterms. Not THAT big a deal.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:35 pm to AlterEd
I provided a link to the 100 page document that’s fully redacted 
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:36 pm to AlterEd
quote:
We frickin know he did because it's been sworn to in court and a goddamn prince has already lost his titles over this shite - hopefully with more to come for that bastard too.
Sorry, should have been more clear. Anybody other than Bill Richardson and Andrew?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:37 pm to VOLhalla
Yes, but with no clue where it actually came from. Which of these PDFs is it? Because these are all that are listed on the DoJ's site pertaining to today's release and not a single one of them is a 100 page fully redacted file.
You wouldn't be lying would you? Or perhaps mistaken. Maybe refresh the DoJs site on your end and see if you can still find it.
Oh shite. I just realized I may be looking at the wrong batch. If so, I apologize.
You wouldn't be lying would you? Or perhaps mistaken. Maybe refresh the DoJs site on your end and see if you can still find it.
Oh shite. I just realized I may be looking at the wrong batch. If so, I apologize.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Sorry, should have been more clear. Anybody other than Bill Richardson and Andrew?
That's literally all you need to know to know that it was happening.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Ffs again decades of this shite has happened.
You think voting is going to be impacted by exceeded release date?
Never affected the past.
You think voting is going to be impacted by exceeded release date?
Never affected the past.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:41 pm to AlterEd
quote:
That's literally all you need to know to know that it was happening.
Agreed. The whole point of the files release is whether or not it shows new perps. I believed the July DOJ Memorandum that said "no evidence to justify additional charges."
Do you think new charges COULD be filed against anybody?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:43 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
I provided a link to the 100 page document that’s fully redacted
I apologize. I was looking at an older batch.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:44 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You wouldn't be lying would you? Or perhaps mistaken. Maybe refresh the DoJs site on your end and see if you can still find it. Oh shite. I just realized I may be looking at the wrong batch. If so, I apologize.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00006209.pdf
Pretty sure my link is legit
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:44 pm to Jbird
Ivory wants Trump to be in a pic with minors sooooo bad
Hes a flaming liberla karen
Hes a flaming liberla karen
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News