- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:45 pm to Rebel
quote:
At first I thought she was probably killed.
I've never not thought that.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:48 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Because they aren't naming names of powerful people by simply saying they're survivors?
So the powerful people are just waiting around for them to say it and THEN kill them? That's dumb. Think about how dumb that is.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:50 pm to Stonehog
I mean, it's worked so far.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:51 pm to Rebel
And according to the Mann act when they are trafficked across state lines or brought in from other countries that’s a crime.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:52 pm to dickkellog
quote:
Probably because most of them were of age and were paid for the sexual services.
But now because they stopped getting paid or didn't get what they wanted or thought they would out of it, they're "rape victims."
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:52 pm to Rebel
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:52 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I mean, it's worked so far.
So if your friend was murdered for naming names of powerful people, you'd go on camera and say "that happened to me too!" But you don't name names because you're afraid of being murdered? That doesn't make any sense. If you were afraid of being murdered you wouldn't say anything about it on camera.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:52 pm to VOR
quote:
Why has the interview transcript that mentions Trump disappeared?
JFC...
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:53 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Almost everything you think you know has been ginned up bullshite that has snowballed in the public mind - fed by a frenzied media.
I'm shocked!
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:54 pm to junkfunky
quote:
quote:
Why has the interview transcript that mentions Trump disappeared?
It's being held in the same vault as the golden shower video.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 3:56 pm to Stonehog
Well, I mean, I'm sure there is some sort of NDA in play here as well. These women came forward to get paid (and good for them, I say. Every penny of that dudes money should be split up between the girls he abused). Along with that I wouldn't be surprised if they were asked to sign NDAs. And I can only imagine that if they break those NDAs, having the money stop coming in would be the least of their concerns.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:02 pm to AlterEd
quote:
And I can only imagine that if they break those NDAs, having the money stop coming in would be the least of their concerns.
I can't imagine that a powerful person that's willing to kill if their name gets out is going to bank their entire life on a person honoring an NDA. It's called tying up loose ends. You don't wait around for them to squeal and then kill them after they've squealed. You would just kill them now before your name gets out.
This post was edited on 2/25/26 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:04 pm to Stonehog
quote:
So if your friend was murdered for naming names of powerful people, you'd go on camera and say "that happened to me too!" But you don't name names because you're afraid of being murdered? That doesn't make any sense. If you were afraid of being murdered you wouldn't say anything about it on camera.
Who was murdered?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:13 pm to Stonehog
quote:These "victims" are grown adults with children and families of their own. They risk their lives if they finger some of Epstein's constituents.
So the powerful people are just waiting around for them to say it and THEN kill them? That's dumb. Think about how dumb that is.
This post was edited on 2/25/26 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:32 pm to Auburn80
quote:
What’s keeping them from naming names in the files? I’m sure a good lawyer could protect them as they do it.
Proving it. If they name someone and cant substantiate the accusation in court then they will be sued into oblivion. If some of these cases progress and witnesses start bargaining then this might gain critical mass.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:39 pm to Auburn80
quote:
What’s keeping them from naming names in the files? I’m sure a good lawyer could protect them as they do it. We know Andrew got named, but why not just name them? The only ones not for this are the guilty people. I really don’t care who gets taken out from either party or abroad
Good question.... maybe....
-The "victims " were over the age of 18 when they cla8m to be victims.
-The actual underage victims have already settled lawsuits and signed NDA's.
-Insert whatever other reason you believe.
The bottom line is, all the folks thirsting for the steamy and sorrid details will NEVER get what they want!!
I can't understand why folks can't grasp this truth. Think of all the fricked off things the federal government has hidden from us..... there's your reason.
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:42 pm to Auburn80
quote:
I understand that thought but I think there have to be ways to protect them.
Epstein was the highest profile prisoner on the planet and he didn't survive official, state-run custody. What the hell does some 23 year old Ukrainian nobody do with that object lesson?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 4:51 pm to Rebel
quote:
I know this won’t be a popular take, but I can’t find any evidence pre-pubescent girls were victims.
you cant find any evidence in the 3 million pages of redacted files you read?
Posted on 2/25/26 at 5:01 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
you cant find any evidence in the 3 million pages of redacted files you read?
Nice try. I never claimed to have read all 3 million. But so far I haven’t seen any and nobody else has either.
Do you have something?
Popular
Back to top


1








