- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal judge deems ICE's warrantless arrests illegal
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:28 am to Lynxrufus2012
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:28 am to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
So if we are invaded we can’t arrest the enemy without a warrant?
Only in that judge’s district. He doesn’t have any power whatsoever outside of his district.
Moreover, ICE and DOJ can obtain contradictory orders from other judges in the same district. Then they don’t have to follow the first order.
2
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:29 am to Jbird
The bench is loaded with seditionists.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:32 am to Jbird
supreme court will slap that down with a quickness, and that'll clear the way for mass deportation in overdrive
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:33 am to SaintsTiger
Lawyers have waaaay too much power in this country and we have far too many.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:37 am to LSUnation78
quote:
Again, if nothing is going to be done about the rot in congress and the judiciary then this second term will never be anything other than a delay for the collapse.
Sadly, that’s exactly what it’s shaping up to be.
Lots of things DJT has done that I’ve liked but nothing that can’t be quickly undone as soon as he’s out of office.
Especially if the batshite Left recaptures a majority next year in the elections, you can forget about it 100%.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:48 am to Jbird
Posted on 11/27/25 at 8:50 am to FriedEggBowL
quote:
supreme court will slap that down with a quickness
I thought they already had deemed these sweeps and deportations as legal. This is starting to get really convoluted.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:02 am to Jbird
To be overturned in 3, 2,1...
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:04 am to FightinTigersDammit
Remember there is no such thing as lawfare.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:06 am to Jbird
SFP promised us
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:07 am to Jbird
Oh that pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way!
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:15 am to retired_tiger
retarded alter.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:17 am to retired_tiger
Oh look. It's retarded tiger again. SFP has lost all control of her many alters.
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:44 am to retired_tiger
quote:I've already demolished SFP on this issue. The 14th amendment absolutely does not grant "due process" to people who are here illegally, no matter how many words SFP tried to insert into the language. It was fascinating watching that imagination pretzel around to make that work. Asperger's in action
Oh that pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way!
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:52 am to Jbird
quote:
Once we break the facade that these justices have any power other than putting out artificial rulings to obstruct the agenda, we can tame a judiciary that has nearly devoured the legislative branch in modern day politics.
And how many divisions did you say this Pope had? - Josef Stalin
Posted on 11/27/25 at 9:57 am to Jbird
Required to “adhere to federal law”
Sounds like common sense…
Sounds like common sense…
Posted on 11/27/25 at 10:13 am to SaintsTiger
quote:
Moreover, ICE and DOJ can obtain contradictory orders from other judges in the same district. Then they don’t have to follow the first order.
Or they can just simply ignore his clearly unconstitutional ruling and tell him to frick off.
I mean, we have been told repeatedly for the last week that everyone should refuse to carry out illegal orders, haven't we?
Posted on 11/27/25 at 10:56 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
I've already demolished SFP on this issue. The 14th amendment absolutely does not grant "due process" to people who are here illegally, no matter how many words SFP tried to insert into the language.
Oh then please school me as well. I graduated law school almost 40 years ago so it has been awhile since I've been schooled.
Let's take a look at the relevant language from Section 1 of the 14th Amendment:
quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
You will note that there is not an exception for "people who here illegally."
It plainly states "any person" for both the equal protection clause and due process clause. And yes, the jurisprudence agrees.
So please, school away.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News