- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For Those Here Thinking Trump is Implicated With Epstein
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:18 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:18 pm to djsdawg
quote:
One of them just said they couldn’t release them because they were sealed.
Because they respect the law so much (except when they commit perjury in front of a FISA court).
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:20 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
if there had been anything criminal in there that was proveable it would have already been used a long time ago.
Indeed. The notion that the party that went to the trouble of creating the Russian Collusion hoax would sit on evidence that Trump was involved in trafficking underage girls is preposterous.
I'm not even sure why Dems went down this road. It has already implicated more of their people than their supposed enemies.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:20 pm to AlterEd
This is all a self own by the GOP - these thing should never have been released because it’s all hearsay.
I’m seeing idiot republican women on Twitter mad because “they supported a pedo”
Amazing to me how Trump is having an all century term and yet people still fall for all of this hoax bs - and thought the evil demonic Dems wouldn’t fight. Of course there is Chaos - the Dems know they are losing badly and this it their death throws
I’m seeing idiot republican women on Twitter mad because “they supported a pedo”
Amazing to me how Trump is having an all century term and yet people still fall for all of this hoax bs - and thought the evil demonic Dems wouldn’t fight. Of course there is Chaos - the Dems know they are losing badly and this it their death throws
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:24 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
I'm not even sure why Dems went down this road. It has already implicated more of their people than their supposed enemies.
They're basically out of ammunition. That's the only possible reason. Because it's too frickin absurd and amounts to nothing more than shooting themselves in the dick. As the poster below you says, they're in their death throes.
I'm just glad that Trump got that legal precedent of arresting and charging a former POTUS out of the way for us, because there are a few that need to go down, including Clinton and this Epstein shite.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:24 pm to AlterEd
You should know by now the only thing they have is, orange man bad.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:26 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Now why would this be? Why did they only care once Trump was back in office
Dont forget Thomas Massie
Why is his name always in the middle of Dim actions, and not republican ones?
1) Moving Biden budget forward, voting against Trumps
2) War powers act
3) Epstein files with Ro Khanna
4) Iran bombing
5) Venezuela
and on and on and on
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:36 pm to djsdawg
Well, some follow the laws.Yall wanted them released, until now He has the power to do so.
Also, some were court ordered to be released and a month later, redactions continuing, they are still not releasing all of the files. Wonder why?
It wouldn't matter what Trump did(he is named 3K times) he could still babysit your daughters np.
Also, some were court ordered to be released and a month later, redactions continuing, they are still not releasing all of the files. Wonder why?
It wouldn't matter what Trump did(he is named 3K times) he could still babysit your daughters np.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:39 pm to AlterEd
They sure keep trying to implicate him with Jeff Epstein......but they just keep coming up empty.
This accusation that Donald Trump did bad stuff with young girls just didn't make sense to me. Why would a man like Donald Trump choose to diddle young girls when he could have his choice of any of a number of gorgeous women.
Politics is a dirty business, and it shouldn't be that way.
Hell is the absence of Absolute Truth (God)
President Trump is right about.........everything.
This accusation that Donald Trump did bad stuff with young girls just didn't make sense to me. Why would a man like Donald Trump choose to diddle young girls when he could have his choice of any of a number of gorgeous women.
Politics is a dirty business, and it shouldn't be that way.
Hell is the absence of Absolute Truth (God)
President Trump is right about.........everything.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:39 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Wonder why?
It was very well explained the other day by Blanche for at least 30 minutes
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:43 pm to AlterEd
As widely reported, There was an ongoing DOJ investigation and they were under seal. I’m assuming you don’t care about the facts though.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:46 pm to AlterEd
The 'sealed' files they're talking about were unsealed by a judge in 2024, when Biden was still president. There are some abuse claims that other people have cited, but those are unfounded hotline tips that were made after Trump was elected, and have no plausibility whatsoever.
I don't think Trump is implicated in any criminal wrongdoing, but to say he only casually knew Epstein is false. It kind of seems like he may have known, though.
I don't think Trump is implicated in any criminal wrongdoing, but to say he only casually knew Epstein is false. It kind of seems like he may have known, though.
quote:The Guardian
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:49 pm to blueboy
Yeah, as the lawyers have said, he was an informant.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:52 pm to Mushroom1968
Trumps lawyer Blanche, with nothing to see here?
Hiding the abusers and naming the victims publicly, who is protecting who?
Hiding the abusers and naming the victims publicly, who is protecting who?
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:07 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Yeah just like he’s everyone’s favorite rep but not a constituent of his. None of you all are flocking to Kentucky 04
That works both ways. How many threads have been started by Massie’s detractors who aren’t constituents of his?
Likewise, AOC isn’t a constituent of any (?) posters here yet how many threads have we seen devoted to her? What is your point?
If Chicken is going to add a residency requirement to TOS for starting a thread on Washington politicians, I think it is fair to assume board traffic will be greatly reduced. Yet until that time, reverence for zip-codes seems an extraneous argument.
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:10 pm to Toomer Deplorable
I’ve never had any issues creating threads and I assume if I did something wrong I’d be let known. Why do you give a shite who posts or what requirement there is when it’s not even your site and you’re just another user?
You’re a fig
You’re a fig
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:10 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Trumps lawyer Blanche,
Epstein’s lawyer and one representing many of the girls have stated Trump is innocent
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:16 pm to Mushroom1968
Ok, good
Why the hesitation and redactions?
The victims say different. Either way you don't care if he was implicated, carry on
Mentioned 3k times and best friend for 10 years before he murked him in jail, but nothing to see.
Why the hesitation and redactions?
The victims say different. Either way you don't care if he was implicated, carry on
Mentioned 3k times and best friend for 10 years before he murked him in jail, but nothing to see.
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:20 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
That works both ways. How many threads have been started by Massie’s detractors who aren’t constituents of his?
You just caused…
Tilt
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 3:21 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





