- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Forensic Audio Analysis confirms that there were 2 shooters
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:49 pm to Smeg
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:49 pm to Smeg
quote:
but couldn't the shots be: Shooter 1: Crooks Shooter 2: USSS return sniper A Shooter 3: USSS return sniper B
No. The shot sequence and the sound of each make it impossible for it to be the case. From where the video was taken, the sound of the first three shots taken were a different caliber rifle than an .556.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:49 pm to Snipe
quote:
If it was a planned hit, Trump would be dead.
Ohhhh. So the shooter was so incredibly accurate that he intentionally hit his ear? I love your logic here
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:50 pm to riverdiver
quote:
Send John a message on X. He’ll respond.
i have a few times. :crickets:
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:54 pm to Run DMC
hes using audio from diff sources.
He also points out screaming, which would affect all the other audio you hear vs no one screaming.
He also points out screaming, which would affect all the other audio you hear vs no one screaming.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:55 pm to SirWinston
quote:
there were likely 3 "bad guy" shooters
Damn, now there were three incompetent shooters?
DEI is even taking a toll on our CIA assassins.
Next time they should just recruit some baws from the nearest hunting club. And if they run dogs, them baws will even be able to hit a target on the run.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:55 pm to Smeg
quote:Yup
Shooter 1: Crooks
Shooter 2: USSS return sniper A
Shooter 3: USSS return sniper B
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:01 pm to Smeg
quote:
I haven't watched the 30 minute video, but couldn't the shots be:
Shooter 1: Crooks
Shooter 2: USSS return sniper A
Shooter 3: USSS return sniper B
Pretty much my perspective.
And this certainly doesn't preclude my conclusion that it was Democrat planned assassination attempt.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:08 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Yep.
The fact that the little SS bitch wouldn't just say the number of shell casing recovered on the roof was all that anyone should need to know.
Who the hell was in that window in the building behind Crooks, and the people or person who took and release the picture of Crooks at the concrete retaining wall (photo from window) between the two buildings?
It smells like rotten fish.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:13 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:only naive fools believe this.
because many here believe it was a lone gunman with a grudge
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:14 pm to AlxTgr
quote:wrong.
Shooter 1: Crooks
Shooter 2: USSS return sniper A
Shooter 3: USSS return sniper B
Yup
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:17 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
How?
audio analysis says in first 5 shots that occured, two different distinct rifles.
SS snipers or any good guys were not a part of the first 5 shots. the 3 paced shots, pause and the first 2 of the rapid fire.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:19 pm to Snipe
quote:
. If it was a planned hit, Trump would be dead.
Except the target (Trump's head) moved at the least millisecond.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:25 pm to AlxTgr
First three shots came from inside building. Next rapid fire grouping csme from crooks AR 15. You can clearly hear the sound difference in the audio. Also, eye witnesses say shots came from water tower. Over 10 say they heard it.
But sure, if you want to believe the government approved narrative, go right ahead.
But sure, if you want to believe the government approved narrative, go right ahead.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:28 pm to Chad504boy
quote:I agree with this part. Three from bad guy.
audio analysis says in first 5 shots that occured, two different distinct rifles.
quote:I disagree with this part.
SS snipers or any good guys were not a part of the first 5 shots
Posted on 7/22/24 at 2:45 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I disagree with this part.
those first 2 shots of 2nd volley were not suppressed shots.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:02 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
those first 2 shots of 2nd volley were not suppressed shots.
Exactly the point. And EVERY SINGLE RIFLE the SS uses as counter weapons for Snipers is suppressed. How do people not comprehend this? There are so many people on this board that don’t understand firearms.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:04 pm to captdalton
quote:
Then they were both bad shots.
If Trump doesn’t move his head a millimeter at the very last second, the whole world would’ve watched his head explode.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:04 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Any suggestions of an inside job gets met with rebuke.
Any suggestions of an inside job need extraordinary evidence to support that extraordinary claim
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:09 pm to Electricboogaloo2
quote:
Any suggestions of an inside job need extraordinary evidence to support that extraordinary claim
Not that extraordinary these days.. just sayin..
Popular
Back to top


0





